Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

What Military Aircraft Would You Bring Back To Service?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

What Military Aircraft Would You Bring Back To Service?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th October 2020 | 12:35
  #61 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 476
Likes: 18
From: East Sussex
My vote goes to the Gnat.
We have to think of small, cheap and PLENTIFUL aircraft so we can maintain a command of the skies over the UK......
With missile technology being so dominant, all you need is a delivery system loaded with missiles and the agility to out perform any opposition.
Stuff a Pegasus in and you've virtually created a small Harrier - best of both worlds, no runways, fast and nimble and jink out of the way of any incoming...

It IS a dream, innit?
Icare9 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 12:40
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 852
Likes: 3
From: Brum
Originally Posted by NutLoose
And there is a Hornet build in the wings I believe, all be it static.
Just a small point, the Sea Hornet being rebuilt will be a flyer...
Nige321 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 12:47
  #63 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Just an even smaller point....did I mention Sea?

https://en-gb.facebook.com/dehavilland.hornet.F1/


NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 13:17
  #64 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 8
From: The No Transgression Zone
Originally Posted by treadigraph
With a Hornet being resurrected in New Zealand, you might get an opportunity!

I'll go for the B-36 - I've never even seen one but I'd love to see and hear one in the air...
A long way back I was holding short on a taxiway waiting for the runway and there was a B36 right in front of me now that's luck! Although, I certainly couldn't hear the engines because of my engine and because of my noise cancelling headset. I was really hoping to watch her take off but alas she was just taxiing around that morning not taking off.

PS at least I think it was a B36
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 13:35
  #65 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
Veteran: Coast Guard
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 54
From: virginia, USA
Lots of nostalgia here, but if I may nominate a type that might actually be useful today it would be the S-3 Viking.

90+ airframes sent to the desert with plenty of fatigue life, and a much better tanker than the E/F Super Hornet with the buddy store, and a useful MPA. Save the wear and tear on the Super Hornets and sheds loads more gas to give.
sandiego89 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 14:27
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 852
Likes: 3
From: Brum
Originally Posted by NutLoose
Just an even smaller point....did I mention Sea?

https://en-gb.facebook.com/dehavilland.hornet.F1/


Beers are on me then. Will be nice to see a flying Sea Hornet though...
Nige321 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 15:20
  #67 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
Phantom F-4!
Boeing Jet is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 15:31
  #68 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
 
Joined: Oct 2018
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,213
Likes: 1,648
From: Ferrara
Originally Posted by sandiego89
Lots of nostalgia here, but if I may nominate a type that might actually be useful today it would be the S-3 Viking.

90+ airframes sent to the desert with plenty of fatigue life, and a much better tanker than the E/F Super Hornet with the buddy store, and a useful MPA. Save the wear and tear on the Super Hornets and sheds loads more gas to give.

I think its a good choice - it worked, it could still work and it would really extend current capabilities
Asturias56 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 15:42
  #69 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 13
Likes: 1
From: UK
Nimrod, Harrier, Hunter....

But most all all, DH Mosquito FB.VI!!!!!! ('cos Dad was a navigator in them!)
Sneezy24 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 16:01
  #70 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 678
Likes: 56
From: York
Maybe the harrier gr5/7/9. Even with my rose tinted glasses I still recall clocking on at 1600 and working through to 0700 shift change the next morning on many of those Cold War mean machines.
dctyke is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 16:31
  #71 (permalink)  
Community Builder
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 663
Likes: 398
From: London
Originally Posted by Green Flash
Chipmunk. Put a silly grin on my face.
There are still quite a few around; I had a tow from one yesterday.

My vote would be for the Lightning, I'd love to see one in the air again. You couldn't do anything useful with it, mind you...
pasta is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 16:59
  #72 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 395
Likes: 63
From: UK
Originally Posted by Arfur Dent
Harrier GR9 for sure
That and the Sea Harrier.

If a further choice was available of course the mighty Buccaneer.
biscuit74 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 17:08
  #73 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 109
Likes: 59
From: West Sussex
As a twenty year old you couldn’t have more fun (in the air) than a Meteor 8.
Quietplease is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 17:14
  #74 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,446
Likes: 367
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by Quietplease
As a twenty year old you couldn’t have more fun (in the air) than a Meteor 8.
Even more 'fun' when you lose an engine.
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 17:14
  #75 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 804
Likes: 96
From: UK
Originally Posted by Asturias56
I think its a good choice - it worked, it could still work and it would really extend current capabilities
I think the only reason this hasn't happened through a private entity is that the USN are holding on to them 'just in case'.
unmanned_droid is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 17:19
  #76 (permalink)  
Community Builder
Community Influencer
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 12,446
Likes: 367
From: Wildest Surrey
Originally Posted by treadigraph
With a Hornet being resurrected in New Zealand, you might get an opportunity!

I'll go for the B-36 - I've never even seen one but I'd love to see and hear one in the air...
In the '50s, we lived near Bovingdon so were used to different types flying over.
One day when I was about 5, I saw a 'big'' plane' with '6 engines pointing backwards'.
I ran indoors and told my brother, who was almost old enough to join the ATC.
He hit me saying I was lying; there was no such thing.
(I don't think it landed at Bovingdon)
chevvron is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 19:07
  #77 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: uk
L1011-500 before BA sold the family silver to the RAF.
OK - I'll get my coat.
frieghtdog2000 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 20:31
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Dartmouth Devon UK
Perfect combo.

How about the mighty Blanik, towed aloft by the Supermunk. Oh, RAFGSA how I need you now.
Flickhammer is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 21:32
  #79 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 343
Likes: 173
From: Scotland
Vigilante & Hustler. Not that they were in service, but the Mirage 4000 & XB-70 would also be nice

Anything supersonic with 2 or more engines come to think about it!
Thrust Augmentation is offline  
Reply
Old 26th October 2020 | 21:58
  #80 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 508
Likes: 24
From: Oxford
Let's have a proper Canberra again! Maybe a PR 19++? Or a Hunter Mk ?? Or a Lightning Mk10 ? Or just a PP, Mosquito, Vampire or maybe(?) an up to date Swift?
Bill
Bill Macgillivray is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.