Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

More info on Astra

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

More info on Astra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Sep 2020, 16:24
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Countdown begins
If you could correct your poor grammar, people may answer you.
Do not disrespect Bader, that would be cheap and in poor taste.
I will go there.

Not from personal experience but as I understand things, Bader was a horrible man and terrible autocratic leader.
heights good is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2020, 16:45
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Coventry
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Countdown begins
I thought ASTRA was just a vanity project! I didn’t realise that it could bring more with less, how cool is that. In 20 years time the RAF will be where it should have been at least two decades ago.
In the meantime I do hope that nobody is caught with their britches down during the next 20 years. That would embarrassing, and would lead to a text book on failed theories for future management courses; a modern day ‘Big Wing’.
The way the RAF is doing 'more with less' is akin to buying 1 tin of paint to paint 1 room, then your wife telling you to paint the whole house but you can't afford to buy more paint so you mix it with water and then throw it at the walls even though as you are doing it you can see it isn't covering the old colours, then you call it 'the new chic' and hope she is stupid enough to believe it.
thelizardking is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2020, 10:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Corporal Clott
If that is the case then how do you square the loop with 14 different ISR types? I make that Reaper (we don’t own any Protectors yet), Sentry, Shadow, Sentinel, D4K, Islander, RJ and Poseidon. That is 8 - including all marks? If I go tri-Service I can add Crowsnest Merlin. If I really stretch it, then add F35B to make 10. No where near close to 14!
I suppose one could double the number of fleets if they're separated into ones that work and ones that don't, including the slightly amputated E-3 at Waddo.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2020, 19:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,232
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Perhaps they've included the Nimrod R.1 at Cosford museum?
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2020, 18:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,279
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts
Apologies for intruding into a Light Blue internal discussion. However, some things in the article linked by the OP really struck me.

TRAINING AND ESTATE
“This needs an absolute revolution,” states Air Mshl Turner. With over 5,500 people in some form of school, college or academy, we need to move away from rote learning towards more learning at the front line and more skills taught on-the-job. “We need to move from our current 17.4 percent of our people in some type of training institution to around seven percent.”
I don't like this in my gut but hope they get it right. Am I wrong that there has already been a continuing tendancy to compress classroom training time over the last 40+ years?

I assume he isn't referring to aircrew? For the technicaI trades/professions I trust this wouldn't lead to aircraft and weapons systems being worked on by the unqualified without intensive supervision.

I grant its a long time since I had direct experience but I have always been struck by the different approach of Annapolis, Colorado Springs and West Point compared to their UK equivalents which seem to be in a rush to produce new officers by comparison.

He notes that the flexibility and remuneration offered by industry needs to be matched if people are to be attracted to the service and retained over the long term. He adds that there also needs to be “a more flexible relationship with industry to allow personnel to move in and out of the organisation, as they will be civil qualified which will make transitions easier. We have called this developing the ‘zig-zag’ career.”
This doesn't actually seem a bad idea to me but I really can't see the money to match remuneration being forthcoming. Presumably there would be a reserve type commitment?

I am very interested in allowing people to be more flexibly employed and move towards a more Full Time Equivalent approach
Could this be managed with pilots? Would it be possible to keep current on both military and civil types? I can see a possible mutual benefit with certain airlines.
SLXOwft is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2020, 16:37
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 831
Received 98 Likes on 51 Posts
I believe it was this project that coined the slogan “Train less- be better” . Good luck squaring that circle! That whirring sound you can hear is Trenchard spinning in his grave.
Timelord is online now  
Old 20th Sep 2020, 10:16
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: England
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turner and ASTRA

I agree completely with Easy Street's earlier post. Having been forced to sit through Turner pontificating at Shawshank a few years ago, I came away with the distinct impression that his immense ego and ambition are the main driving forces that produce the numerous visions for unachievable vanity projects that he loves to try and impress everyone with, instead of sensible, pragmatic and achievable solutions. Only the Treasury and the current economic situation will determine how the RAF are resourced and what can subsequently be achieved, no matter how many cloud-nine visions he chooses to generate. He has a track record of having introduced poorly thought through visions that subsequently failed to achieve the desired effect and I confidently predict the ASTRA will only add to this list.
Visitation is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2020, 06:58
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wildest Surrey
Age: 75
Posts: 10,814
Received 95 Likes on 68 Posts
Originally Posted by Martin the Martian
Perhaps they've included the Nimrod R.1 at Cosford museum?
Never existed; figment of your imagination.
Would that be the Nimrod type which used to broadcast its route on the Sumburgh Tower frequency when heading north towards the north of Sweden back in 1972?
chevvron is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2020, 08:17
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: EGOS Field 24
Posts: 1,114
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Would that be the Nimrod type which used to broadcast its route on the Sumburgh Tower frequency when heading north towards the north of Sweden back in 1972?
Didn't that non-existent aircraft come into non-existent service in mid-1974?
ACW599 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2020, 09:29
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,232
Received 50 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by chevvron
Never existed; figment of your imagination.
Ah, so the MAD boom fell off after all!
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2020, 10:53
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SLXOwft


Could this be managed with pilots? Would it be possible to keep current on both military and civil types? I can see a possible mutual benefit with certain airlines.
Whether it is still the case I have no idea, but in the past once one was posted away from a particular (military) type one was deemed to be 'non-current' with immediate effect. It would certainly be possible to remain current having left, returning for essential BCRs and the like, but I suspect 'the system' isn't really set up for that sort of thing.

We did experiment with reservists at Lyneham for a short period of time but matching their availability to the tasking was ultimately impossible. I can well remember having a conversation with someone's personal assistant about getting someone to crew a flight, a day trip to and from Europe, only to be asked if we could delay it until the following week when they would have a space in their diary. The only one's who were available tended to be those who'd retired and were at a bit of a loose end - i.e. unemployed or pottering around the garden tending to their petunias whilst waiting for gin-o-clock.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2020, 12:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 192
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Willard Whyte
Whether it is still the case I have no idea, but in the past once one was posted away from a particular (military) type one was deemed to be 'non-current' with immediate effect. It would certainly be possible to remain current having left, returning for essential BCRs and the like, but I suspect 'the system' isn't really set up for that sort of thing.

We did experiment with reservists at Lyneham for a short period of time but matching their availability to the tasking was ultimately impossible. I can well remember having a conversation with someone's personal assistant about getting someone to crew a flight, a day trip to and from Europe, only to be asked if we could delay it until the following week when they would have a space in their diary. The only one's who were available tended to be those who'd retired and were at a bit of a loose end - i.e. unemployed or pottering around the garden tending to their petunias whilst waiting for gin-o-clock.
It is done in other Air Forces. RAAF and the US Air National Guard to name two. It can be made to work but obviously there are some challenges depending on the nature of the unit, as well as the personnel commitments required.

flighthappens is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2020, 20:43
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Ibstock
Posts: 66
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by flighthappens
It is done in other Air Forces. RAAF and the US Air National Guard to name two. It can be made to work but obviously there are some challenges depending on the nature of the unit, as well as the personnel commitments required.
For reservist aircrew, is it much of a cost saving? I’d have thought with abatement etc, but the loss of HDT, it must be exactly the same cost as a regular?
Countdown begins is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 19:16
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,789
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by Countdown begins
For reservist aircrew, is it much of a cost saving? I’d have thought with abatement etc, but the loss of HDT, it must be exactly the same cost as a regular?
It's not about cost saving (well, not directly). Think of it more as a "retention" measure, in that people who've had enough of regular service might be "retained" in cockpits on reservist terms. So more use would be made of that expensive initial training, which today is generally lost to the RAF when someone leaves; a larger force could therefore be sustained. That's the theory, anyway. A possible risk would be regulars stampeding for the exit if they thought they could ditch all the BS and just keep flying...
Easy Street is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 20:38
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: the far south
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 34 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Easy Street
. A possible risk would be regulars stampeding for the exit if they thought they could ditch all the BS and just keep flying...
Might just have to give it time.

And one of these 'leaders' might come up with a radical plan:

Employ a few extra bods for each sqn so aircrew don't drown in BS secondary duties.

Then aircrew are tasked fulltime with flying , study flying and air warfare and preparing themselves mentally and physically for the job.

As a parallel look at professional sport and the understanding of the small differences between winning and losing.

Would a junior pilot on a Typhoon Sqn train the same way as a Manchester United striker?

and if not why not?




typerated is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2020, 20:43
  #36 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
As someone once said, “Isn’t it a shame that those who know better than everyone else only ever get to cut hair or drive taxis?”
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2020, 21:53
  #37 (permalink)  
MG
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 593
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
The company...have poached 3 x blue suits that were desperate for ground tours. Rather than offer respite, the RAF put up barriers and dug pot holes to encourage them to leave
so they didn’t really poach them, did I they? More like welcomed them with open arms.
MG is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.