Bell 360 Invictus
Thread Starter
Bell 360 Invictus
Bell unveils new 360 Invictus for US Army FARA competition
VERSATILE. LETHAL. SUSTAINABLE. BELL ANNOUNCES 360 INVICTUS FOR U.S. ARMY FARA COMPETITION - Bell (news)
Thread Starter
Go ahead to continue in the FARA competition and to build prototype
BELL 360 INVICTUS CHOSEN TO CONTINUE IN U.S. ARMY?S NEW SCOUT ROTORCRAFT COMPETITION - Bell (news)
cheers
BELL 360 INVICTUS CHOSEN TO CONTINUE IN U.S. ARMY?S NEW SCOUT ROTORCRAFT COMPETITION - Bell (news)
cheers
Read a neat little article earlier today about how the Bell V-280 is the most likely to win the lift and Raider the attack since both represent advances in tech ... not sure if that's true, but the "big picture" logic makes sense to me in terms of keeping both OEM's as going concerns ... the Defense Industrial Base must be maintained ...
Read a neat little article earlier today about how the Bell V-280 is the most likely to win the lift and Raider the attack since both represent advances in tech ... not sure if that's true, but the "big picture" logic makes sense to me in terms of keeping both OEM's as going concerns ... the Defense Industrial Base must be maintained ...
Regarding FARA, Bell and Sikorsky are pursuing two very different strategies. Bell is emphasizing a design that is an advanced version of current technology. They're planning to meet Army's requirements while offering low relative risk and (presumably) lower cost. Sikorsky is going for higher performance and capability, but clearly is more risky given that it's new technology and X2's troublesome record so far. They offer the potential for higher speed and range and a small (i.e. not as big as AVX's) troop compartment presumably at a higher cost. Of course, the ability to carry troops has not been a requirement so far and the selection of Bell as one of the two finalists indicates it still isn't. It will all depend on how they weight the final evaluations. Low risk overall or X2 encounters serious delays or problems? Bell wins. Lowest cost transcends everything? Bell wins. X2 does well, isn't dramatically more expensive and the cabin is worth it to Army? Sikorsky wins.
...and of course there is the industrial base consideration in both programs, but note that FARA is nominally to be selected before FLRAA. If Sikorsky gets that, that would argue for Bell for FLRAA in addition to its performance . And we can't forget the power of lobbyists.
The wing is a direct copy of the Sikorsky S67 Blackhawk which was built as a private project and offered to the US Army in the early '70s, the sole prototype being destroyed at Farnborough on 1 Sep 1974.
I dunno. The Blackhawk's wing was larger, had a pronounced dihedral and was mounted at the bottom of the fuselage. The Iinvictus' wing is smaller, has no dihedral, appears to be less swept and is mounted mid fuselage.
Also, the Invictus' wing has no speedbrakes, while that was a key point of the Blackhawk wing design.
Thread Starter
Construction starts
Bell started building the Invictus prototype last week
Thread Starter
The following users liked this post:
That looks like a fantastic idea as an emergency extraction/insertion kit. Wonder what the changeover time and paperwork sign off would be? Litter kit as well. Great to see that this is being thought of straight up.
Does rather feel like if you've got time to change your role fit to replace your weapon loadout with Gucci popout seats, you've probably got time to call a Blackhawk/v-280/Chinook to do the whole seat thing. Generally when people use AH to move people it's a right here, right now or it all goes badly type thing.
The following users liked this post:
Let's be honest, somebody at Bell has finally realised that every 'Scout' the US Army has owned has had the ability to rapidly reconfigure to be a light transport/liaison aircraft and 'Colonel's Taxi'. The Raider X has a clear advantage in this area, so Bell have had to come up with this compromise….
Does rather feel like if you've got time to change your role fit to replace your weapon loadout with Gucci popout seats, you've probably got time to call a Blackhawk/v-280/Chinook to do the whole seat thing. Generally when people use AH to move people it's a right here, right now or it all goes badly type thing.
Thread Starter
Practically, no doubt, you are correct. But knowing how much easier it is for Attack/Scout to operate forward, what a great idea. Without doubt, it will be cancelled/refused by some Shnorker Troop lift pumper. The platforms you mention, without doubt, are far more suited to deliberate lift. That said, inserting/extracting small teams with a non expected platform has stood the test of time.
Maybe the plan is to use it like little birds, Come in drop of the guys and use it to support with its chaingun
Thanks for the pix, chopper!