Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

MoD may destroy Mull of Kintyre Chinook crash records

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

MoD may destroy Mull of Kintyre Chinook crash records

Old 3rd Jun 2019, 19:17
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 77
Posts: 4,071
Originally Posted by ShyTorque View Post
Chugalug, I was one of the very first to sign, having had a message from the "Irritating Sod" himself.
Sorry ShyTorque, my bad. I meant you in the generic sense. Others have yet to though, and I would suggest they should do so ASAP to show the shared strength of feeling on the matter.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 07:18
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 0
If I had done this CFIT, my chums would say I was careless, and they'd be right.
Nomad2 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 08:06
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 56
Posts: 1,961
And so it starts
jayteeto is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 08:25
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 56
Posts: 1,961
If I’d have done this CFIT with an aircraft that had potentially spooled up to uncontrollable full power, with no instrument flying or icing clearance, that even the test pilots refused to fly..... my friends would have been a little bit peeed off.
of course this may not have happened, nobody knows. But it had happened before and the crew were ACTUALLY worried about it happening pre flight
jayteeto is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 08:26
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Liverpool based Geordie, so calm down, calm down kidda!!
Age: 56
Posts: 1,961
Other than that, you are correct
jayteeto is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 08:58
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: North Island
Posts: 3
Originally Posted by Nomad2 View Post
If I had done this CFIT, my chums would say I was careless, and they'd be right.
Dude you must be trolling or have zero SA on the mood of this thread. Either way you're not adding anything of value to the conversation.
Vortexringshark is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 08:59
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1
Long time luker on this group. Petition signed and ill be sharing on FB
flyallan53 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 09:59
  #128 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 12,110
Originally Posted by Nomad2 View Post
If I had done this CFIT, my chums would say I was careless, and they'd be right.
So you are well known for being a careless pilot. These two were definitely not.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 12:51
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 0
Even the best of us make mistakes.


Nomad2 is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 15:13
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 2,814
I do wish the minority would do the vast majority the courtesy of reading the facts before launching into speculation and denigrating the pilots.

There is a reason why Lord Philip recommended the setting aside of the gross negligence findings, and Government and MoD rolled belly up.

On 2 June 1994, the Chinook HC Mk2 had a ground training and familiarisation clearance only, and was ‘not to be relied upon in any way whatsoever’. Lord Philip confirmed this was ‘mandated’ upon the Assistant Chief of the Air Staff. (MoK Review report, para 2.5.8). MoD finally conceded this, in writing, on 28 February 2012.

The question which MoD will not answer is, why did AVM Anthony Bagnall ignore this mandate and release the Mk2 to service? Who else was involved? MoD has named only one other - Controller Aircraft, who issued the mandate to Bagnall. Most would think that unlikely, and it is not the only time he has been fingered by the same people who then spent years defending the decision to blame the pilots, and continue to brief against them to the media. Controller Aircraft has never lowered himself to their level; and nor has his successor who was in post in June 1994.

That is why the historical papers are so important.

Please think about these facts before posting.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2019, 15:27
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Deplorable but happy as a drunken Monkey!
Age: 70
Posts: 16,085
It would appear the immediate priority is to ensure permanent preservation of ALL records, documents, evidence, transcripts....etc.....guaranteed by each and every authority in possession of same.

Then, another and final investigation take place that undertakes to fully document everything related to this tragedy....create a Time Line and Chronological review of Statements, Documents, etc to document the exact chain of events that transpired.

It should address each issue, disputed point, decision, and action taken by the various authorities to determine what actually transpired before, at the time of the accident, and afterwards.

Let the Chips lay where they fall....and if there is blame to be fixed.....do so without partiality and favor.

Just set forth what is known and how it all relates to everything else.

But....the very first step has to be the preservation of the documentary evidence.
SASless is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2019, 17:51
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: RWB, UK
Age: 72
Posts: 66
I have recently finished reading David Hill's "Their Geatest Disgrace".
David, Thank You for your not inconsiderable efforts throughout this sordid saga culminating in your most revealing book. I say this as a retired regular and reserve pilot on C130s, another fleet that suffered under the same and similar hierachy.
Rompers Green the cartoon strip in the Lyneham station mag, in the 70s and 80s, from the much missed Chas Finn-Kelcey, was so correct with the AOC and CinCs,
" Dam Truckies" regular comments.
I was an early signature on this petition.
Perhaps "Their Greatest Disgrace" should be compulsory reading before posting on this forum.

1066
1066 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2019, 08:43
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Sussex
Age: 77
Posts: 4,071
Well said 1066. I'm not sure about reading Their Greatest Disgrace being compulsory but it is surely highly recommended reading, especially in the great value Kindle format :-

Amazon Amazon

Anyone who has followed the far too many Airworthiness Related Fatal Air Accident threads on this forum would be more than aware of the massive link that connects them all; a military air safety system deliberately subverted by RAF VSOs for short term financial saving, and the cover up by other RAF VSOs of that subversion ever since. Those that continue blaming JO and SO scapegoats are what I term the MOD apologists. That others see them in a similar way is a tribute to the dedication of David Hill and his ilk who continue to strive for the urgent reform of UK Military Air Regulation and Air Accident Investigation.
Chugalug2 is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2019, 12:34
  #134 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 856
Couldn't remember whether I'd signed the petition - so did it anyway. Rapidly got a reply telling me I'd done it already. D'oh.... Anyway, shows that bit of the system works OK.

airsound
airsound is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2019, 09:03
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 25
Worth repeating:

Originally Posted by tucumseh View Post
Current issue arises from this, in Hansard...

https://publications.parliament.uk/p...t/00626w01.htm

Lord Chalfont asked Her Majesty's Government:
  • Whether any papers or documents relating to the crash of Chinook Helicopter ZD 576 have been or are being destroyed; and, if so, whether they will ensure that there is no further such destruction.[HL2738]
  • Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: None of the original Board of Inquiry papers, written evidence or papers held by the branch with lead responsibility for matters concerning the crash has been destroyed. When they are eventually archived, they will be assigned a review date of 25 years, with a recommendation for permanent retention. At the 25-year point they will be examined for the suitability for transfer to the Public Record Office in accordance with the provision of the Public Records Act 1958 and 1967.

    26 Jun 2000 : Column WA52

But the lead branch (the Chinook Integrated Project Team) did not hold the most relevant evidence, because the Directorate of the Air Staff and Air Member Logistics had concealed it from them. The reply does not preclude destruction by the Air Staff or Air Member Logistics’ successors of that evidence - and that is what they did.

By the time of the Mull of Kintyre Review, MoD was denying the very existence of key evidence, such as the Release to Service and the policy statement that the FADEC software was safety critical. It had lied to families about both. Both documents had to be supplied to Lord Philip by campaigners.

Worth repeating.
tiarna is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.