Youthful High Spirits
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 1,822
Youthful High Spirits
Dreadful, un-officery behaviour? Or a bit of fun. Hopefully the latter- not seeing the RMP (probably SIB) being 'a fun lot' though.
Waterboarding, Sandhurst style.
CG
Edit: relevance: the (alleged) victim has a Weber
Waterboarding, Sandhurst style.
CG
Edit: relevance: the (alleged) victim has a Weber
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 777
Non-story about 1/2 a tea cup...
OCdt Petal cries foul and the RMP lap it up as a real crime for them to play superheroes.
OCdt Petal, or mother of, doesn’t get their own way so calls the Currant Bun...which, last time I looked is against the Rules. RMAS machine goes into lockdown.
(Allegedly)
OCdt Petal cries foul and the RMP lap it up as a real crime for them to play superheroes.
OCdt Petal, or mother of, doesn’t get their own way so calls the Currant Bun...which, last time I looked is against the Rules. RMAS machine goes into lockdown.
(Allegedly)
Last edited by gijoe; 18th Aug 2018 at 22:31. Reason: Error
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,633
Originally Posted by diginagain
I wonder what techniques Plod will employ in their efforts to get to the bottom of this?
That was my experience of RAF police interrogation methods in the 80's.
Sorry what's that you said?
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 25,503
Re. the Chivenor incident of 29 years ago:
As posted by my old chum Flying Lawyer:
As posted by my old chum Flying Lawyer:
The three defendants and the injured man were all RAF officers attending a party to celebrate the completion of flying training.
Although it was accepted that the defendants had not intended to cause injury, they were court martialled and convicted of inflicting GBH contrary to s. 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
The Court Martial Appeal Court (as the Court of Appeal Criminal Division is called when dealing with Service cases) held that the judge-advocate should have directed the court martial to consider whether the injured man gave his consent as a willing participant to the activities in question, or whether the appellants may have believed that he did.
Their convictions were quashed.
Although it was accepted that the defendants had not intended to cause injury, they were court martialled and convicted of inflicting GBH contrary to s. 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
The Court Martial Appeal Court (as the Court of Appeal Criminal Division is called when dealing with Service cases) held that the judge-advocate should have directed the court martial to consider whether the injured man gave his consent as a willing participant to the activities in question, or whether the appellants may have believed that he did.
Their convictions were quashed.
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 76
Posts: 16,613
o consider whether the injured man gave his consent as a willing participant to the activities in question, or whether the appellants may have believed that he did.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 367
Originally Posted by gijoe
Non-story about 1/2 a tea cup...
OCdt Petal cries foul and the RMP lap it up as a real crime for them to play superheroes.
OCdt Petal, or mother of, doesn’t get their own way so calls the Currant Bun...which, last time I looked is against the Rules. RMAS machine goes into lockdown.
(Allegedly)
OCdt Petal cries foul and the RMP lap it up as a real crime for them to play superheroes.
OCdt Petal, or mother of, doesn’t get their own way so calls the Currant Bun...which, last time I looked is against the Rules. RMAS machine goes into lockdown.
(Allegedly)
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 1,822
Originally Posted by heights good
I just want to check, waterboarding was used as an ‘enhanced interrogation’ technique to try and make terrorists talk, but “OCdt Petal” is over-reacting?
CG
Thought police antagonist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Where I always have been...firmly in the real world
Posts: 930
" I wonder if the accused have their hearing checks up to date.
That was my experience of RAF police interrogation methods in the 80's.
Sorry what's that you said?"
Ah, they had clearly changed their questioning techniques from the "softly softly " approach in the 70's, possibly because asking such inane questions as "do you know what an M.U is ?.....well sort of as I'm based on one...."why are your jeans faded ?"..erm, it's the current fashion perhaps " how often do you shower ?".....depends on how often I get covered in fuel and PRC doing Lightning fuel leaks really....quite frequently actually....and "why do you have bulk soap powder and soap / shampoo supplies "?...living out of a suitcase in a transit block every day may give you a clue here...... didn't really work that well. The immortal words of C/T Ben C of 71 MU infamy ( banned from at least 3 Messes ) come to mind here " don't sign anything......pause....and don't deck them ! "
I got the impression they had finally realised their error when the F/S plod took exception to being called.... sunshine
That was my experience of RAF police interrogation methods in the 80's.
Sorry what's that you said?"
Ah, they had clearly changed their questioning techniques from the "softly softly " approach in the 70's, possibly because asking such inane questions as "do you know what an M.U is ?.....well sort of as I'm based on one...."why are your jeans faded ?"..erm, it's the current fashion perhaps " how often do you shower ?".....depends on how often I get covered in fuel and PRC doing Lightning fuel leaks really....quite frequently actually....and "why do you have bulk soap powder and soap / shampoo supplies "?...living out of a suitcase in a transit block every day may give you a clue here...... didn't really work that well. The immortal words of C/T Ben C of 71 MU infamy ( banned from at least 3 Messes ) come to mind here " don't sign anything......pause....and don't deck them ! "
I got the impression they had finally realised their error when the F/S plod took exception to being called.... sunshine
