Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Nimrod MR4 vs P8

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Nimrod MR4 vs P8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th May 2017, 16:14
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by The Old Fat One
This is pretty much spot except as mentioned above this was completely common knowledge in the 70 late alone later. Many of the airframe issues came up during the ill rated AEW debacle (funny how often that fails to get a mention) and you can even roll back the lack of space issues to the 1960's comet v 707.

Military folk with decades of maritime experience, on the ground and in the air, were venting their frustrations about all of this in 1990's and as I've mentioned before, I, like many others, was ordered to "get with the programme" by the then staish.

I was at BAE on a course in May 1998 when a crew chief uncovered a previously unknown issue with the bomb doors. It was a headslap doh moment. Pretty funny really, except for the 3 billion plus tax payers money down the swanney and 10 years (maybe more?) with no kipper fleet.

Still well-played BAE Marketing Team...that was some stunt you pulled off there.

edit cross posting Haraka...answer yes, and they were all know and out in the open from the get-go.
Indeed, replace MR4A with F35b and we are where we are..
glad rag is offline  
Old 28th May 2017, 18:27
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by betty swallox
Hey Davef68.

Just wondering why you think the P-8A isn't designed to do "hard manoeuvring at low level"?
bad syntax, I said designed when I meant 'intended'
Davef68 is offline  
Old 29th May 2017, 09:55
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is both designed and intended to do so.
It has a new wing and can drop stuff from below the wings and it's bomb bay. It has a thicker skin to do more higher g maneuvering at lower altitudes. Like when hunting submarines.

737-MMA / P8A Poseidon
Kerosene Kraut is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.