UK MoD Exchange Rate Hole
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
UK MoD Exchange Rate Hole
Today's "Times":-
--------------------------------------
The MoD faces a multi-billion pound hole due to post Brexit exchange rates.
The NAO warns that the £ 82 Bn 10 years modernisation plan includes £ 18.6 Bn in dollars and Euro 2.6Bn all set at pre-referendum rates of exchange and "poses a significant risk to the plans affordability" If the pound stays were it is right now there is a £ 3Bn hole.
The MoD also requires a further £ 6 Bn saving after the £ 24.4 Bn of extra commitments announced in 22015 which will absord ALL the £ 10.7 Bn "headroom" built into the original plan.
-----------------------------
Looks like more cuts coming guys.......
--------------------------------------
The MoD faces a multi-billion pound hole due to post Brexit exchange rates.
The NAO warns that the £ 82 Bn 10 years modernisation plan includes £ 18.6 Bn in dollars and Euro 2.6Bn all set at pre-referendum rates of exchange and "poses a significant risk to the plans affordability" If the pound stays were it is right now there is a £ 3Bn hole.
The MoD also requires a further £ 6 Bn saving after the £ 24.4 Bn of extra commitments announced in 22015 which will absord ALL the £ 10.7 Bn "headroom" built into the original plan.
-----------------------------
Looks like more cuts coming guys.......

Joined: Aug 2001
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 165
From: se england
No need to worry about all those extra Bns of $$$$$ we need to pay America; since Mother Theresa's meeting with Trump that will all be waived in the spirit of the special relationship won't it.... er won't it.
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
What is worrying is that we've already run out of the contingency on current plans - that sort of explains why the frigate order keeps moving right
I wouldn't be surprised to see the P-8 suffer the same fate.................
I wouldn't be surprised to see the P-8 suffer the same fate.................


Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
The MoD also requires a further £ 6 Bn saving after the £ 24.4 Bn of extra commitments announced in 22015 which will absord ALL the £ 10.7 Bn "headroom" built into the original plan.
Planning ahead?
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
And so many folk on here are always whittering on about "why don't we just buy American..."
You reap what you sow.
You reap what you sow.

Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 756
Likes: 34
From: London
The problem is simple, mod had contingency funds for procurement and some exchange rate variation. Where it (and many other organisations) have been hit is an in year 20% (ish) collapse in the exchange rate - thats a fairly hefty sum to absorb. But of course far easier to write about bungling officials etc...

Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 484
From: The Roman Empire
Some (most?) of these procurement programs, such as F-35/JSF, run over many years. Presumably we don't pay all the costs up front, but in a series of payments, so do not exchange rate fluctuations effect costs throughout the life of the program, and who is to say that the exchange rate might not be more beneficial in a year or so, saving us money?
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
Problem is that people have to make forecasts - if the rate is bad now any future expenditure looks difficult......
I've never heard of the Treasury saying "don't worry Minister, the Bank's Exchange rate Forecast for 2020 is fine so we can go ahead and spend..." - its CUT!! CUT!!! CUT!!!!
I've never heard of the Treasury saying "don't worry Minister, the Bank's Exchange rate Forecast for 2020 is fine so we can go ahead and spend..." - its CUT!! CUT!!! CUT!!!!
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could

Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 16,699
Likes: 54
From: Lincolnshire
Today the Single Source Regulations Office aims to tighten up control of the arms budget. Foreign military sales are exempt but they want to know if they should examine FMS too.
Now remind me how we got Herc and F4 and and C17 - good and Nimrod 3/4 rather than E3 and P8.
Would F15 been better than GR1/4 or F14 than the F3?
Now remind me how we got Herc and F4 and and C17 - good and Nimrod 3/4 rather than E3 and P8.
Would F15 been better than GR1/4 or F14 than the F3?





