Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

UK MoD Exchange Rate Hole

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

UK MoD Exchange Rate Hole

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th January 2017 | 08:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
UK MoD Exchange Rate Hole

Today's "Times":-
--------------------------------------
The MoD faces a multi-billion pound hole due to post Brexit exchange rates.

The NAO warns that the £ 82 Bn 10 years modernisation plan includes £ 18.6 Bn in dollars and Euro 2.6Bn all set at pre-referendum rates of exchange and "poses a significant risk to the plans affordability" If the pound stays were it is right now there is a £ 3Bn hole.

The MoD also requires a further £ 6 Bn saving after the £ 24.4 Bn of extra commitments announced in 22015 which will absord ALL the £ 10.7 Bn "headroom" built into the original plan.
-----------------------------
Looks like more cuts coming guys.......
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2017 | 09:31
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 632
Likes: 3
From: UK
Any rumours of redundancies............?
Could be the last? is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2017 | 16:53
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,081
Likes: 252
From: London/Oxford/New York
And so many folk on here are always whittering on about "why don't we just buy American..."

You reap what you sow.
pr00ne is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2017 | 17:01
  #4 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Aviation Qualifications: Spotter
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 165
From: se england
No need to worry about all those extra Bns of $$$$$ we need to pay America; since Mother Theresa's meeting with Trump that will all be waived in the spirit of the special relationship won't it.... er won't it.
pax britanica is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2017 | 18:38
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
What is worrying is that we've already run out of the contingency on current plans - that sort of explains why the frigate order keeps moving right

I wouldn't be surprised to see the P-8 suffer the same fate.................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 28th January 2017 | 18:41
  #6 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
The MoD also requires a further £ 6 Bn saving after the £ 24.4 Bn of extra commitments announced in 22015 which will absord ALL the £ 10.7 Bn "headroom" built into the original plan.

Planning ahead?
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 29th January 2017 | 09:05
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
We will be past the point of only having one aircarft (as per Moses Law) by then Nut.........

Bu there will still be a raft of committees in existance............
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 29th January 2017 | 19:20
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
And so many folk on here are always whittering on about "why don't we just buy American..."

You reap what you sow.
That's why, when most competent organisations plan to buy foreign goods and services, they hedge the currency. There is no excuse for failing to manage Forex risk.
Bigbux is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2017 | 14:31
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
except we 'd get headlines such as

"MoD pours millions into pockets of May's Cronies in City"
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2017 | 15:22
  #10 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 756
Likes: 34
From: London
The problem is simple, mod had contingency funds for procurement and some exchange rate variation. Where it (and many other organisations) have been hit is an in year 20% (ish) collapse in the exchange rate - thats a fairly hefty sum to absorb. But of course far easier to write about bungling officials etc...
Jimlad1 is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2017 | 16:22
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
Agreed -

when you think Harold Wilson was mocked for devaluing the currency by only 14% you have to suspect it will catch up with this lot sooner or later
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 30th January 2017 | 17:17
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 2,965
Likes: 484
From: The Roman Empire
Some (most?) of these procurement programs, such as F-35/JSF, run over many years. Presumably we don't pay all the costs up front, but in a series of payments, so do not exchange rate fluctuations effect costs throughout the life of the program, and who is to say that the exchange rate might not be more beneficial in a year or so, saving us money?
Biggus is online now  
Reply
Old 30th January 2017 | 17:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 675
Likes: 0
From: Racedo blows goats
Correct Biggus, we were in a worse position during the banking crisis in 2007.
engineer(retard) is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2017 | 10:36
  #14 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
Problem is that people have to make forecasts - if the rate is bad now any future expenditure looks difficult......

I've never heard of the Treasury saying "don't worry Minister, the Bank's Exchange rate Forecast for 2020 is fine so we can go ahead and spend..." - its CUT!! CUT!!! CUT!!!!
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 31st January 2017 | 12:03
  #15 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 16,699
Likes: 54
From: Lincolnshire
Today the Single Source Regulations Office aims to tighten up control of the arms budget. Foreign military sales are exempt but they want to know if they should examine FMS too.

Now remind me how we got Herc and F4 and and C17 - good and Nimrod 3/4 rather than E3 and P8.

Would F15 been better than GR1/4 or F14 than the F3?
Pontius Navigator is online now  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 05:54
  #16 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 738
Likes: 4
From: london,uk
The banking crisis was an event, leaving the EU is a permanent state. Unless we stay in the Single Market the Pound has found its new level.
peter we is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 08:22
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
if we're lucky........................
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 08:34
  #18 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,579
Likes: 142
From: Under the clouds now
Just divert some of the £350 million a week promised to the NHS by Gove, Bojo and Farridge - problem solved. Better add a bit to compensate for rising oil prices too
brakedwell is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 09:55
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 2
From: London
That seems to have disapeared... funny that.........
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Reply
Old 1st February 2017 | 10:25
  #20 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 2
From: one side of la Manche
350M

HH
But we haven't left the EU yet.

Batco
PS; Re the 350M, I'm not holding my breath on that.
BATCO is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.