Red Arrows to get new aircraft...
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England formerly Great Britain
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The fact that the statement is lacking the whole story gives much cause for concern.
Were it "Red Arrows to get Hawk T2" in 2018 just in time for the RAF Centenary year I could believe it and await the public outcry from some about the plethora of things that would benefit from taxpayers money.
Todays statement is akin to throwing a brick in a pond. Govt now stand back and see how many ripples reach the shore based upon speculation to test the water and see if 'new aircraft' need to be downgraded to recycled aircraft such as Tucano - or the whole thing filed under "J for joke".
For sure MFTS/Ascent could be a stick in the spokes as politics presently play its hand with Grob Tutor deployments away from base and the need for ground support.
The more I think about it, the more I think today is a scoping exercise for public reaction. The Grannies & Spotters will love it; a huge swathe of society will begrudge it. It needs to be done and dusted well outside any potential election campaign for it is destined to be contentious.
Were it "Red Arrows to get Hawk T2" in 2018 just in time for the RAF Centenary year I could believe it and await the public outcry from some about the plethora of things that would benefit from taxpayers money.
Todays statement is akin to throwing a brick in a pond. Govt now stand back and see how many ripples reach the shore based upon speculation to test the water and see if 'new aircraft' need to be downgraded to recycled aircraft such as Tucano - or the whole thing filed under "J for joke".
For sure MFTS/Ascent could be a stick in the spokes as politics presently play its hand with Grob Tutor deployments away from base and the need for ground support.
The more I think about it, the more I think today is a scoping exercise for public reaction. The Grannies & Spotters will love it; a huge swathe of society will begrudge it. It needs to be done and dusted well outside any potential election campaign for it is destined to be contentious.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,813
Received 141 Likes
on
65 Posts
From the first post's link:
Ahhh, that's a different story altogether.
Amendment: This story was changed on November 1 to reflect the defence secretary's comments that the Red Arrows fleet would be reviewed rather than imminently replaced.
Better not done at all than badly surely?
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,813
Received 141 Likes
on
65 Posts
Do we have a dozen spare Typhoons with enough airframe life to cope with the Reds' exuberant flying?
Anyway, it's now another 'Review", just like the LTC has had them as a line item since the 80s.
Anyway, it's now another 'Review", just like the LTC has had them as a line item since the 80s.
The most unradical solution would be Hawk T2s. If we're getting an extra 2 Typhoon Sqns dedicated to air defence, and given the current political climate, we may expect possibly to see more T2s anyway from which perhaps enough to form a 5 or 7 ship for example. Such a move would be reasonable and ensure the team live on for a fair few years yet!
However, if the thinking is to use anything lighter would certainly miss the point of the Red Arrows altogether.
Interesting though how in these more abundant and resourceful times the RAF have no obvious successor to a display team mount that has been on the go for 40 years or so.
FB
However, if the thinking is to use anything lighter would certainly miss the point of the Red Arrows altogether.
Interesting though how in these more abundant and resourceful times the RAF have no obvious successor to a display team mount that has been on the go for 40 years or so.
FB
Cost per flying hour would be a bit of an issue for Typhoon, sadly.
Typhoon - £70-90k/hour a few years back.
Hawk T1 (Red Arrows) - £6k/hour
Hard to see how the answer shouldn't be a Hawk T2. Being UK built is part of the overall media/PR package.
I don't think many in the public really care about the marginal cost of running the RAFAT.
And as for numbers - it has to be nine if for no other reason that the Patrouille de France have eight aircraft
Typhoon - £70-90k/hour a few years back.
Hawk T1 (Red Arrows) - £6k/hour
Hard to see how the answer shouldn't be a Hawk T2. Being UK built is part of the overall media/PR package.
I don't think many in the public really care about the marginal cost of running the RAFAT.
And as for numbers - it has to be nine if for no other reason that the Patrouille de France have eight aircraft
Could the replacement be the Textron AirLand Scorpion?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textron_AirLand_Scorpion
An April Fool this year. Scorpion photo shopped in Reds scheme.
STOP PRESS! Red Arrows Hawk Replacement Announced
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Textron_AirLand_Scorpion
An April Fool this year. Scorpion photo shopped in Reds scheme.
STOP PRESS! Red Arrows Hawk Replacement Announced
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I predicted the purchase of a fleet of Kawasaki P1s, so in the same vein of unflappable self-delusion, I offer you:
Boeing: Boeing T-X Sees the Light
Job's a good un.
Boeing: Boeing T-X Sees the Light
Job's a good un.
Maybe HAL will offer a good deal on some Hawk 132s? The IAF did after all buy 20 for its own aerobatic team recently...
Alternatively, how many Alpha Jets do QQ have...?
Alternatively, how many Alpha Jets do QQ have...?
When do the Red Arrows become one of the largest squadrons in the RAF?
Following on from LBs comment about the Red Arrows being declared a reserve combat squadron....
As a combat squadron (I hesitate to say AD or GA given the mix of crew backgrounds) would the Red Arrows aircrew offer one of the toughest challenges out there to an enemy? or would they be not at their best combat wise due to the aeros practice?
I know this is a rather whimsical question, but they've apparently been chosen as the best of the best (cue volleyball scene...).
Sorry, in a flippant mood tonight.
Following on from LBs comment about the Red Arrows being declared a reserve combat squadron....
As a combat squadron (I hesitate to say AD or GA given the mix of crew backgrounds) would the Red Arrows aircrew offer one of the toughest challenges out there to an enemy? or would they be not at their best combat wise due to the aeros practice?
I know this is a rather whimsical question, but they've apparently been chosen as the best of the best (cue volleyball scene...).
Sorry, in a flippant mood tonight.
I would imagine the T1s will soldier on for a while yet. Potentially, could any replacement be linked with new aircraft for 100 and &
736NAS? Assuming those units have a long term future.
736NAS? Assuming those units have a long term future.