Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

When did "Reheat" become "Afterburner" ?

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

When did "Reheat" become "Afterburner" ?

Old 2nd Jan 2019, 12:11
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Not far from a lot of solar panels.
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re #73
Anybody know if the man with the extinguisher still has a 'ringing' sound in his ears? 'Elf'n'safety, etc.

By the way, undercarriage down and locked is impossible to determine from the cockpit/flight deck! Even though there may be three greens indicated.
Null Orifice is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 12:19
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Confusing one for me Is LIGHT OFF call during engine start. Especially when during the start you are also monitoring warning lights that you also expect to go OFF.
Glad you brought that one up. I spent 10 years reading Bombardier documentation that refers to 'Light Off' during the start sequence. Now I'll reluctantly go along with 'Touch & Go' when doing Rollers, but I ain't ever going to teach an RAF student to use the term 'Light Off' when he starts a jet engine! (or is that now called a gas turbine!?)
H Peacock is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 12:36
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 74
Posts: 17,769
Received 130 Likes on 51 Posts
We are, indeed, two nations divided by a
common language ....
That and a whole lot of salt water thank goodness!
SASless is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 13:36
  #84 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 75
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hoss183 View Post
The term was changed after confusion caused by crew meals being prepared in the Vulcan's microwave oven. Ok i'll get my hat & coat....
Ah! You must mean the "Ration Heaters"? I remember finding a turd in one of them during an After-Flight inspection. That's about all they were fit for I reckon.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 13:43
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 74
Posts: 17,769
Received 130 Likes on 51 Posts
Could one utilize the Microwave Oven when operating "EMCON"....would hate for the Nav to give away the aircraft's position by heating up some Pies?
SASless is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 14:18
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
…..a certain Lightning formation leader called "Reheat, Reheat, Go.....Now", which caused a stir among his formation members...…
That would be 'Spike' Newman then.
dook is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 14:27
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Augusta, Georgia, USA (back from Germany again)
Posts: 216
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why do the Americans call the ground floor the 1st floor.
Uh, because it is?

The Germans say "ground floor" and "first upper floor."
LTCTerry is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 16:03
  #88 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,054
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by LTCTerry View Post
Uh, because it is?

The Germans say "ground floor" and "first upper floor."
They also say "halb sieben" (half seven) - but actually mean 06:30. Don't be late for briefing!
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 17:54
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Dundee
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Saintsman View Post
Man vs Fire.

That man is wearing no safety equipment!

What was he thinking...
I think he's also looking in the wrong direction.

But hey Ho..
weemonkey is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 21:36
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by megan View Post
The following is what Ed Schmued had to say re the radiator design
Thanks for that, Megan - an interesting piece. I would only take issue with one part (which I'm sure was an unintended "mispeaking" at the time because Ed Schmued definitely know what he was talking about!), where he says:

The distribution of power is approximately as follows: 100 percent energy in fuel is put into the engine, but about 30 percent of this has to be radiated into the air to cool the engine. Another 30 percent of the energy is lost in the exhaust heat of the engine. Then 25 percent is usually used on the propeller. This amount of power drives the airplane, overcoming the drag, so 15 percent of the fuel energy is lost in mechanical friction.
The energy dissipated in friction will of course be converted into heat which is included in the "30% radiated into the air" that he mentions - it can't be a separate element in this sum. I don't doubt his figure for the overall thermal efficiency (25%), but I would add the frictional losses and cylinder cooling losses together to get a ballpark number for the radiator sizing. So if it's a 1,000bhp engine I would expect the radiator and oil cooler to have to dissipate a large chunk of the 1,800bhp (~1.3MW) of heat dumped to the engine casing. Somewhere I have a piece in one of Ricardo's books which suggests that for watercooled engines like the Merlin and Sabre over half the thermal energy dissipated through the engine casing comes out as radiated heat (he was suggesting this is the only reason that aircooled engines didn't melt!), so I'd suggest that for a 1,000BHP engine the radiator and oil cooler would need to be able to dissipate at least 800BHP (~600kW) at full power - 80% of the nominal power dyno'd at the propshaft.

PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2019, 23:31
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 67
Posts: 3,793
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Wensleydale View Post
Not when, in reality, you put your trunk into the boot!
Interesting - I usually put my foot in a boot, and my bag in the trunk, but to each his own
tdracer is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2019, 07:37
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 67
Posts: 5,088
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Interesting - I usually put my foot in a boot, and my bag in the trunk, but to each his own
The Trunk is a large wooden chest, used to carry possessions on expeditions and long journeys. It was usually stored in the boot room of large houses which was near the servant's entrance and also where the dirty boots and shoes were kept before they could be cleaned. Therefore, possessions in trunks were often placed into the "boot" before being carried out to the coach: instructions to the house staff being what to put into the boot! I would assume that American coaches did not have a separate boot, but the trunk was strapped onto the top or back of the coach, leading to where possessions were placed. (American houses probably didn't have a boot room either).
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2019, 16:09
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 335
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American houses probably didn't have a boot room either
I know standards in the colonies were lower, but really.
Bing is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2019, 16:12
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 74
Posts: 17,769
Received 130 Likes on 51 Posts
Ah, but we do leave our boots in the Mud Room.
SASless is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2019, 07:07
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 67
Posts: 5,088
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Ah, but we do leave our boots in the Mud Room.
Then why do you have fenders instead of mudguards?
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2019, 09:10
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Mordor
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wensleydale View Post
Then why do you have fenders instead of mudguards?
So do we, but only on boats - and therein lies the clue. The typical american car has always had the agility, fuel-consumption and handling of a fully-laden supertanker so they feel it appropriate to apply maritime terminology to their cars...



PDR
PDR1 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2019, 15:55
  #97 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 13,969
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Could one utilize the Microwave Oven when operating "EMCON"....would hate for the Nav to give away the aircraft's position by heating up some Pies?
Just follow the smoke trail, just like on USAF F4s......
ORAC is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2019, 15:25
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 74
Posts: 17,769
Received 130 Likes on 51 Posts
I suppose if we had wings instead of fenders....we would have no need for mud rooms.

But how do you retain your bonnets while using wings?
SASless is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.