Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Pilatus PC21, as fast or faster than WW2 fighters ?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Pilatus PC21, as fast or faster than WW2 fighters ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Sep 2016, 07:38
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,710
Received 40 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Fortissimo
As others have noted, PC9 was a clear winner apart from the unfortunate part about it not coming from Brazil.
Or more relevant perhaps, not being built in Belfast
Davef68 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 11:24
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Aberdeenshire
Age: 76
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was "normal procedure" for making good a late time at a turning point? My experience on the JP was in 1970
Lingo Dan is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2016, 17:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bury St. Edmunds
Age: 64
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LingoDan


The time tolerances we worked to in say a Final Nav Test ISTR +/- 6 seconds all using Mk1 eyeball, stopwatch, compass and map (1:50,000 for the IP to target).


There were two options to catch up time; the first obviously was to cut the corner at a turning point or more scientifically, say if say 30 seconds late when planning to have a ground speed of 300 kts, i.e. 5 miles a minute, to increase speed. 30 seconds late meant that you had 2.5 miles to catch up.




How much and how long depended on how long you had left to the target but say it was 10 minutes away, then you could increase speed by 30 knots (an extra 1/2 mile per minute) for 5 minutes to get back the lost time and then revert to the planned speed after allowing for the higher headwind. If you were early due to a tailwind then the amount you had to slow down by could be worked out in the same way.


Obviously the JP only had a limited margin to increase speed so this wouldn't allow for major deviations from plan but you still were expected to try!


I hope that this makes sense - it was over 35 years ago and way before GPS!


MB
Madbob is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.