Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The 'dying' Royal Navy; what the US can learn.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The 'dying' Royal Navy; what the US can learn.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th Aug 2016, 05:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 'dying' Royal Navy; what the US can learn.

Reuters has a view..

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-uk-military-navy-commentary-idUSKCN10L1AD
Al R is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 08:02
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 30 Miles from the A1
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Almost enough to make a man in Grenada spill his rum punch!
2Planks is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 09:28
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
Deeply depressing. I used to go past Devonport in the train and look at the warships and joke to Mrs TTN - "that's probably the whole of the fleet in there".
Now it seems I wouldn't be too far off
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 11:12
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's what happens when Governments prioritise tax cuts and handouts (education, social security, pensions) over defence

No-one goes into bat for defence and the Ministers are all second raters with no stroke
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 11:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 587
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let's hope the new carriers don't share the same reliability probs as the Type 45s..
PPRuNeUser0139 is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 11:59
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Budapest
Posts: 324
Received 258 Likes on 154 Posts
"No votes in defence" - allegedly.
Expatrick is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 14:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sidevalve
Let's hope the new carriers don't share the same reliability probs as the Type 45s..
Is there any reason to think they would?

Apart from being grey, do they have anything in common?
Tourist is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 14:38
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: 30 Miles from the A1
Posts: 488
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
BAe Systems in one guise or another
2Planks is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 15:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hampshire
Age: 78
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I undersatand from an Authority close to a Cmdr (E) up at the Clyde ,that the Modules once built at Portsmouth,then transported up to Scotland,sometimes dont marry up to their counterparts.Even watertight doors are not able to actuate in their slots,and then small items like a Plinth onto which a Phalanx mounting is bolted,has its bolt holes not lining up with its flange plate,so someone could not even drill out from a template accurately.I suppose when the Aircraft wont arrive until 2020,someone can redo the job properly!!!!Can hope I suppose,but the sooner eveything is removed fom the Wicked Witch of the North's domain and returned South,then maybe we can have a Navy that will work!!!??
FAStoat is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 15:47
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Torquay, UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A close family member, a project manager on that job would agree. However, the quality issues didn't lie with the Portsmouth teams
mattandmoosdad is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 16:36
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2Planks
BAe Systems in one guise or another

Yes, but that applies to pretty much every piece of equipment in our entire military.....
Tourist is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 17:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
No-one goes into bat for defence and the Ministers are all second raters with no stroke
Yep, its all "Health - Education - Health - Education" = mention defence and you are committing political suicide.

Billions have been chucked away on a university system where thousands of academically mediocre students are pushed through and given joke degrees. Meanwhile if we suddenly decided we were going to seriously invest in defence, would there be a sufficiently large skilled workforce to make the kit?

(btw PPRuNe spell checker, its defence on this side of the pond, not defense )
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 18:03
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,105
Received 2,952 Likes on 1,259 Posts
The bit that rankles is when politicians witter on that we may have less ships but they have greater capability and weaponry.

Great, but it doesn't hold water when you need one ship covering the South Atlantic and one in the Gulf region, and you have replaced the two lesser capable ships with one, that cannot be in two places at once.
NutLoose is online now  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 18:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 532
Received 178 Likes on 94 Posts
I undersatand from an Authority close to a Cmdr (E) up at the Clyde ,that the Modules once built at Portsmouth,then transported up to Scotland,sometimes dont marry up to their counterparts.Even watertight doors are not able to actuate in their slots,and then small items like a Plinth onto which a Phalanx mounting is bolted,has its bolt holes not lining up with its flange plate,so someone could not even drill out from a template accurately.
Given that when last I looked, all the Portsmouth modules (with the exception of one Island) were hangar deck and below, I suspect your contact may be mistaken. The sponson modules where the CIWS live were erected at Rosyth, mainly from steel fabricated in Appledore and shipped up.

Issues with marrying up large blocks will always arise. The difference in doing them between different shipyards is that it gets contractual rather than just the heads of the steel fab and shipbuilding departments in one shipyard having a shouting match and then just fixing the problem. Mountains and molehills one suspects - possibly compounded by RN personnel with limited experiences of working in build yards (as opposed to refit).
Not_a_boffin is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 18:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,105
Received 2,952 Likes on 1,259 Posts
Maybe there reducing section sizes as the budget shrinks
NutLoose is online now  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 18:41
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,847
Received 318 Likes on 115 Posts
Billions have been chucked away on a university system where thousands of academically mediocre students are pushed through and given joke degrees.
Quite true. The reason being that it kept Bliar's unemployment figures looking better than they really were.... A few kids doing 'meeja studies' or somesuch tosh at university, rather than being on the dole.
BEagle is online now  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 19:32
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The initial production run of Eurofighter fuselage sections didn't line up either.
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 19:53
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In a roundabout way, Mr Putin and his foreign ventures just might help these things change. I wander how an electorate that is forced to send £15 billion abroad as aid, is told there isn't enough money to defend them whilst they sleep.
tonker is offline  
Old 11th Aug 2016, 20:45
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Racedo blows goats
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps our technological edge is being eroded:

Are Russia's military advances a problem for Nato? - BBC News
engineer(retard) is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2016, 09:46
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Moscow region
Age: 65
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a quick diversion from the RN to Russian army :-)


Engineer, please, look at the author of that artice - "a diplomatic correspondent" talking about electronic warfare :-) Plus an abracadabra about "Russian military operations in Ukraine". The guy is totally inconsistent: if the Russians are so smart, why did not they overtake Kiev in two days? The answer is obvious: there are no regular Russian troop in Ukraine :-) Advisors, some volunteers - yes, but on the other side there are many NATO advisors and volunteers from West and nobody cries about that.


Coming back to RN, this is probably a reflection of the "threat model" currently used by the politicians. Clearly it is not needed as far as Russia is concerned, but (from a trespasser point of view) regarding issues like Falklands, it should be kept in a good shape....
A_Van is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.