Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

The 'dying' Royal Navy; what the US can learn.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

The 'dying' Royal Navy; what the US can learn.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Aug 2016, 11:42
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: The sunny South
Posts: 819
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by msbbarratt
...the trouble in Malaysia and Borneo were successfully dealt with without the large scale involvement of RN, RAF and Army, back in the days when all three were much larger...
Are you including Konfrontasi (Confrontation)?
Attached Files
FODPlod is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2016, 15:48
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lancing, Sussex
Age: 92
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Naval helicopters

Having spend some years on the bits that attach weapons to naval choppers, always annoyed they are only ever shown fishing things out of the oggin.
Whereas their primary job would be sinking enemy ships.
The choppers torpedo or missile would be a frigate's main armament.
The 4.5" popgun on the fore-deck would not be much use
Exnomad is offline  
Old 15th Aug 2016, 02:44
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Outside the Matz
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And another bites the dust...


UK loses operational maintenance and repair capability as Diligence is retired early | IHS Jane's 360
Bannock is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2016, 01:04
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Outside the Matz
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just realized why.
There's nothing left to fix... Hat , coat, etc
Bannock is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2016, 08:59
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't need a mobile base when they're all parked up at Portsmouth or Plymouth anyway
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2016, 09:59
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Southport
Posts: 1,335
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
My £0.02 worth....

The Navy should "defend the realm" along with the other armed forces as appropriate. Only after that is assured should we debate whether "force projection" is necessary, and if we decide it is, then you have to spend accordingly.
Problem is, the requirements change faster than the snails pace of procurement, so it's never right. Add inter-service bickering and top-heavy management (more admirals than ships?) and the results aren't good. Doing stuff on the cheap rarely works well, and when it does, it's usually down to the skill and bloody-mindedness of the guys at the pointy end somehow dragging it out of the fire.
Thing is none of our PPE graduate politicians ever seem to have bothered to study any history......
andytug is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2016, 10:34
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,502
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts
The Royal Navy will be even smaller when Scotland takes it share.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2016, 10:53
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by andytug
Thing is none of our PPE graduate politicians ever seem to have bothered to study any history......
Neither have you by the sound of it.....


The idea that "defence of the realm" is best done at home is fallacious as any student of history will tell you.

Always fight on the enemies territory, and for that you need expeditionary.
Tourist is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2016, 11:01
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Southport
Posts: 1,335
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Tourist
Neither have you by the sound of it.....


The idea that "defence of the realm" is best done at home is fallacious as any student of history will tell you.

Always fight on the enemies territory, and for that you need expeditionary.
Probably didn't put it very well, was trying to be distinct between defending ourselves and (for example) trying to police the world with the US.
(Bit simplistic, it's a lot more complex than that).
andytug is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2016, 10:03
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 3,225
Received 172 Likes on 65 Posts
the requirements change faster than the snails pace of procurement
Some years ago, after yet another uninformed rant by the Public Accounts Committee, it was suggested that the "customers" (Service users) be invited to comment on the best and worst procurement projects they'd experienced. After all, Post Project Reviews are written by the project manager, not the customer. Few bothered (itself a feature of procurement), but analysis of the successful projects revealed some embarrassing similarities and recommendations, most of which involved stripping out 3 or 4 layers of upper "management" involvement from both sides. By far the most successful RN project was notable for the RN's Aircraft Support Executive withdrawing support for it before the contracts were even let, leaving MoD(PE) to do the job properly in peace.
tucumseh is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2016, 19:45
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Nottingham
Age: 76
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Re retards comment on our technological edge being eroded. I suggest you keep an eye on Rolls Royce who whilst always screaming that they can't recruit enough engineering staff are quietly issuing redundancy notices to those they do have.
Prangster is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.