Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tornado F2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2021, 13:38
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Originally Posted by ATSA1
Reading this thread, it seems that the F2 and F3 were not really fit for purpose as Medium to High level Interceptors...

or am i missing something?
You are. AMRAAM, ASRAAM and JTIDS!!
BEagle is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2021, 15:56
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Eastern Cape, South Africa
Posts: 138
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
All good stuff, but how capable was the airframe to get the missiles into suitable envelopes to fire?

I heard at the time that when the MiG29s first visted Farnborough in 1988, the F3 escorts struggled to keep up with them!
ATSA1 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2021, 16:12
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
No they didn't!

I flew the VC10K with the press party (AP, ITV, BBC, TASS, AvWeek, Flight etc.) on that trip; one problem was that the F3 outfit had an extra jet which they positioned between the VC10K and the MiG 29s, which was an infernal nuisance. After we met them over the North Sea, all went fine until the descent through the Daventry sector, when ATC weren't very helpful. We had to leave the formation and rejoin below cloud, by which time the F3s were doing their own thing contrary to the brief.

But the journos got their shots for rhe magazines and the video went out on the evening news!
BEagle is offline  
Old 28th Sep 2021, 18:44
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 4,334
Received 80 Likes on 32 Posts
ExAscoteer2
Did the F3 have the capability of an unrefuelled transatlntic crossing?
Yes! As per my previous post.

A Tornado F3, ZE155, flew unrefuelled in ferry fit non-stop across the Atlantic from Goose Bay to Warton on 24 Sep 1987. It was the first RAF fighter aircraft to do so without air-to-air refuelling. The flight took 4 hours 45 minutes.
You are of course correct that Blue Spruce isn’t in the NATS, my poorly written post, but it is detailed within NAT Doc 007 which is what I was trying to point out. There is not much chance of an F3 flying at FL285+ in the cruise in Ferry Fit, hence it would have been below the NAT tracks. I suspect it cruised between FL150 and FL200 for most of the transit in that fit. Even clean, ie. with no tanks, the aircraft didn’t like cruising above FL330, but it could get above FL500 (allegedly ) if you were doing M1.2+. But then you would be in min reheat and so you wouldn’t be up there for too long!
Lima Juliet is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.