Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Puma2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jul 2015, 22:03
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ESSEX
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Puma2

Is it better than the merlin?
SARF is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 00:54
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Down Memory Lane
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tiger Tales is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 03:13
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: one side of la Manche
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
SARF
To get the ball rolling,
It depends………….

Assuming you don't mean the ASW Merlin, then a couple of advantages (seen from the back end) of the Merlin are:
- It can carry/deliver a full infantry platoon in one go
- The ramp is far far better for heavily laden troops

Batco

Last edited by BATCO; 20th Jul 2015 at 03:58.
BATCO is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 07:01
  #4 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 431 Likes on 227 Posts
You'd have to join the navy to fly a Merlin. Apart from that, it's not too bad.

A whole platoon? Why is that an advantage? From a piloting perspective, you only fly the cockpit....
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 09:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
According to the blurb the upgrade means the Mk2 can carry twice the payload over 3 times the range of the Mk1 without significant hot and high issues. Whatever the comparison with the Merlin, on the face of it that sounds an unusually worthwhile upgrade. I believe crashworthiness has also been improved, although how that compares to the Merlin I don't know.
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 09:41
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Location: Location!
Posts: 2,303
Received 35 Likes on 27 Posts
Post No 2 suggets Marlin more than Merlin....

Jack
Union Jack is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 10:59
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,340
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
the Mk2 can carry twice the payload
Love to see it with 32 troops inside, al sitting comfortably!

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 11:30
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 327
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by charliegolf
Love to see it with 32 troops inside, al sitting comfortably!

CG
That may be what they mean by hot and high. In fairness, some would probably need to be slung underneath.
Frostchamber is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 11:58
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 119K East of SARDOT
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fitting crashworthy seats into the Mk2 cabin has certainly restricted its troop lifting capability. Clear floor (Belize) F Troop style.
Sand4Gold is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 12:20
  #10 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 431 Likes on 227 Posts
In fairness, some would probably need to be slung underneath.
That's a good idea. The crewman could go in the underslung load net on a long intercom lead and supervise from there. He could also be a talking radalt.....in a fairly high voice, obviously.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 20:22
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Why is the Puma 2 still the only type of Puma of any variant in the world where the pilots are not allowed to use the designer and factory supplied cockpit doors?
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2015, 05:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,457
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Charliegolf,

Have you never heard of an unslung load?????!!!!!

O-D
Old-Duffer is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2015, 08:39
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: E MIDLANDS
Posts: 291
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I wasn't aware that there was a "pinger version" of the Puma 2 ever considered by the UK.

Last edited by andyy; 21st Jul 2015 at 08:55.
andyy is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2015, 08:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Corinium
Age: 71
Posts: 138
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
The Question really should be the one asked back in the late 80's answered for us by one Mr Heseltine. Is the Merlin better than Chinook? And the answer of course is No!!!! Puma 2 has replaced Puma1 and at last we have/are getting more Chinooks to replace an aircraft we were forced into buying to save jobs at Westland.
huge72 is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2015, 11:39
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Richard Burtonville, South Wales.
Posts: 2,340
Received 62 Likes on 45 Posts
Charliegolf,

Have you never heard of an unslung load?????!!!!!

O-D
Yes, and banter too!

CG
charliegolf is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2015, 12:40
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,235
Received 52 Likes on 21 Posts
I wasn't aware that there was a "pinger version" of the Puma 2 ever considered by the UK.
That one passed me by as well. I know that when the HC.1 was under development there was talk of selling the Puma to the Fleet Air Arm as a SAR cab to replace the Whirlwind. Unfortunately for Westland they were already delivering the Sea King, which freed up rather a lot of Wessex 3s to supplant the Whirlwind instead.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 21st Jul 2015, 13:52
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
there was talk of selling the Puma to the Fleet Air Arm as a SAR cab to replace the Whirlwind. Unfortunately for Westland they were already delivering the Sea King, which freed up rather a lot of Wessex 3s to supplant the Whirlwind instead.
Presumably issues like endurance and lack of shipborne capability might have limited the appeal of the Puma as a potential SAR aircraft for the Fleet Air Arm!
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.