88mm Flak Gun and Panther Tank found in villa.
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Can anyone explain the device at the end of the gun barrel on the Panther ? I've seen this on several tanks and have always been puzzled as to it's function and purpose ?
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,571
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes
on
32 Posts
Its a Muzzle Brake.....the gases from the shot pass sideways through the device and help to stop some of the recoil although the side blast that this device produced could give away the gun's position. Therefore, some mobile anti-tank guns dispensed with it.
Suspicion breeds confidence
Wensleydale
He did the test firings for Sabot in Dorset. Unfortunately the planners placed the infantry ahead of the tank and wondered why they fell down when a sabot shell was fired.
Also a Firefly could could not fire on the move. It would strip the gearbox.
especially when used with APDS ammunition
Also a Firefly could could not fire on the move. It would strip the gearbox.
Last edited by Navaleye; 4th Jul 2015 at 09:57.
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Japan
Age: 71
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@ Stilton. That device is a muzzle brake, the purpose is to divert some of the enengy from firing the projectile to reducing the recoil (I think). Happy to be corrected.
Question. When all closed up in a tank, how does the gunner get to aim the gun? How does he do his sighting?
Question. When all closed up in a tank, how does the gunner get to aim the gun? How does he do his sighting?
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
The only reason they won was that the German industry got crippled and the German production lines just couldn't produce enough tanks.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,082
Received 2,942 Likes
on
1,253 Posts
Question. When all closed up in a tank, how does the gunner get to aim the gun? How does he do his sighting?
This is the machine gunners periscope, as you see it can rotate
http://s427.photobucket.com/user/Gar...ml?sort=3&o=19
Internal view
http://s427.photobucket.com/user/Gar...ml?sort=3&o=41
Goudie
The failure of the Panther was mainly due to a very overstressed final drive (post WW2, the French operated the Panther and found it needed a final drive major overhaul after every 150km of use). This in turn was caused by industrial shortages forcing it to be built with lower strength steel in a less effective design. The two major problems were lack of high strength steel and lack of machine tools (the weak final drive had straight-cut gears as there was insufficient tooling to make the preferred helically-cut gears). The lack of machine tools was down to area bombing, which deliberately targeted this capacity. They didn't try to hit the machines, the idea was simply to blow the roofs off and let the weather do the work.
Coupled with this was the German policy of maximising output at the expense of spares. So the Panther would arrive at the front by rail, advance 100 km and break down. With no spares, the technicians would have to rob the spares off another u/s Panther. Except, of course, this was probably u/s because of a broken final drive also.
43% of Panthers at the battle of Kursk went u/s through mechanical failure.
So, arguably the Germans did produce enough tanks, but it was meeting this target at the expense of serviceability and spares which did them in.
The failure of the Panther was mainly due to a very overstressed final drive (post WW2, the French operated the Panther and found it needed a final drive major overhaul after every 150km of use). This in turn was caused by industrial shortages forcing it to be built with lower strength steel in a less effective design. The two major problems were lack of high strength steel and lack of machine tools (the weak final drive had straight-cut gears as there was insufficient tooling to make the preferred helically-cut gears). The lack of machine tools was down to area bombing, which deliberately targeted this capacity. They didn't try to hit the machines, the idea was simply to blow the roofs off and let the weather do the work.
Coupled with this was the German policy of maximising output at the expense of spares. So the Panther would arrive at the front by rail, advance 100 km and break down. With no spares, the technicians would have to rob the spares off another u/s Panther. Except, of course, this was probably u/s because of a broken final drive also.
43% of Panthers at the battle of Kursk went u/s through mechanical failure.
So, arguably the Germans did produce enough tanks, but it was meeting this target at the expense of serviceability and spares which did them in.
Something always sinister about our germainian friends and their basements !
Re muzzle break it can serve three purposes
As already stated it reduces recoil by dirverting gas rearward and as it obeys newton's laws offsets the recoil by applying a forward pressure
Secondarily if diverted appropriatley it reduces elevation due to recoil and puts the gun back on original target ( or more closer) for a second shot if needed
I also understand ( although memory fades )!it can also give be used to reduce losses due to the resistance of air ahead of the round but obviously cannot increase pressure to increase range.. Something to with aperture size and location ( front whole is limiting and side vents have a bigger effect in releasing the pressure ahead of the shell and as they do for energising gases from the charge).. I am sure some one here can elaborated... It's all very complicated and nurse called nap time halfway through the explanation
Re muzzle break it can serve three purposes
As already stated it reduces recoil by dirverting gas rearward and as it obeys newton's laws offsets the recoil by applying a forward pressure
Secondarily if diverted appropriatley it reduces elevation due to recoil and puts the gun back on original target ( or more closer) for a second shot if needed
I also understand ( although memory fades )!it can also give be used to reduce losses due to the resistance of air ahead of the round but obviously cannot increase pressure to increase range.. Something to with aperture size and location ( front whole is limiting and side vents have a bigger effect in releasing the pressure ahead of the shell and as they do for energising gases from the charge).. I am sure some one here can elaborated... It's all very complicated and nurse called nap time halfway through the explanation
I am sure they would say that or was it effective air to ground and the il2 doing it's job... I guess the others would say that too!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Maintenance wasn't their strong point. The lost dozens outside Stalingrad during Operation Uranus when it was discovered that mice had decided that a hull was a nice place to keep warm while they ate the insulation off the electrical wiring. Nom nom nom!
Orac - since you had not specified which end of the gun, I nearly replied "a tank"...............
now I look at it, not that funny either, but it is a very hot afternoon, and I have just been to have a replacement exhaust delivered from UK fitted, and guess what, they sent Ford Focus gaskets.........for a Nissan X-Trail. So I am grumpy anyway!
now I look at it, not that funny either, but it is a very hot afternoon, and I have just been to have a replacement exhaust delivered from UK fitted, and guess what, they sent Ford Focus gaskets.........for a Nissan X-Trail. So I am grumpy anyway!
My vote goes to the 17pdr. My father was a radio operator/gunner in a Sherman Firefly and he killed 2 Panthers and Tiger plus Mk3 and Mk4. The boxheads were good but they were scared of the 17pdr. I believe one got Wittman.
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,082
Received 2,942 Likes
on
1,253 Posts
You should try the free game War-Thunder online, trust me the Russians that developed it, seem to have thrown the book out as to what tanks are better than others, heck they even have T54's fighting Panthers.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Penzance, Cornwall UK
Age: 84
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 17 pr and the 88mm were excellent tank guns but the Soviet JS with its 122mm gun firing a solid full bore shot would reduce any armoured vehicle to scrap metal. It was further developed after the war resulting in the T-10 which forced the western powers to scramble to find the equivalent. Neither the optimistically named Conqueror or the M-107 even came close.