Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

88mm Flak Gun and Panther Tank found in villa.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

88mm Flak Gun and Panther Tank found in villa.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jul 2015, 14:13
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,201
Received 401 Likes on 248 Posts
Originally Posted by tdracer
BTW, back to the original thread topic - I read a book on WWII tanks many years ago (it had lots of neat cutaway illustrations and such - quite an interesting read). IIRC, the reason the Sherman (and other US tanks) had such mediocre guns was that the planners didn't foresee "tank vs. tank" as being the predominate battle tactic.
Not to mention the point that a critical design feature of the Sherman was based on how many would fit on a ship that would transport it across the ocean. That has BFA to do with good tank warfare, except that if you can't get to the fight you can't be in it.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 14:25
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re Firefly. It didn't go into production until early 1944. By D-Day there simply just weren't enough going around.
Hempy is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 14:35
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,413
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
Lonewolf, again going from distant memory, but I think the width of the Sherman was dictated by the standard width of the US rail system - i.e. that it would fit on the standard rail car and fit through the normal rail tunnels and bridges. Hence the relatively tall and narrow profile.

IIRC, the US produced ~50,000 Shermans during WWII, while total German production of Panther, Tiger, and Tiger II tanks was a few thousand.
tdracer is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 14:40
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: london
Posts: 721
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
I think you'll find though that the claim "that the Russian campaign in Manchuria was the reason that the Japanese surrendered" is a little myopic.
Why did Truman order hostilities to be resumed?
Why did the USAAF want a 3rd bomb dropped as a wake up call on Tokyo? Because the Japanese were stalling on negotiations. It would seem a 3rd bomb was being prepared, but not for Tokyo, more likely Sapporo.
Why did the USAAF launch a 'thousand plane raid' on Aug14/15th?
Not me but several historians have pointed out the swift Russian victories impacted more on the Japanese leadership and brought about the surrender.

Last edited by rolling20; 7th Jul 2015 at 14:54.
rolling20 is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 14:55
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if that's the case it's a pity the US wasted all that money on the Manhatten Project then. All they needed to do was wait for the Soviets to invade Manchuria
Hempy is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 16:57
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
One of Rommel's most successful tactics in the Western Desert was to use his own tanks to lure a British counter attack onto his very effective anti-tank guns. Early British Tanks did not have guns capable of firing HE shells (only 2x close support (CS) tanks with "howitzers" were available to each regiment) and therefore the British Armour did not have an effective anti-anti-tank gun capability. The M4 Sherman gave the British armour that HE capability...however the 17 pdr, although it could shoot an HE shell, was not very effective in this role - the shell casing had to be very thick and heavy to withstand the high velocity of the gun, and weight of explosive in the HE shell was much reduced.


However, several methods were tried to fit the 17 pdr into other tanks...the main problem being the diameter of the turret ring and the ability to fit the tank onto railway running stock. In the Firefly, the 17 pdr had to be mounted sideways to get the gun to fit inside the turret and was therefore awkward to load. It was not until the Comet, arrived in spring 1945 that the British armour finally got an effective mount for the 17 pdr.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 18:04
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: england
Age: 61
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the germans were so wary of the 17pdr that some enterprising tankies would slip a long piece of mild steel over the standard Sherman barrel to create the illusion of a firefly.


seems strange that he cannot own a panther or decommed 88....maybe he should save up for a newbuild ME262!!!
mr fish is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 18:13
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Frensham
Posts: 846
Received 90 Likes on 48 Posts
Originally Posted by mr fish
the germans were so wary of the 17pdr that some enterprising tankies would slip a long piece of mild steel over the standard Sherman barrel to create the illusion of a firefly.


seems strange that he cannot own a panther or decommed 88....maybe he should save up for a newbuild ME262!!!
While some Firefly crews would attempt to camoflage the 17pdr as they were the priority target for the Germans in any engagement.

Canadian 5th armoured division Sherman Firefly in Holland, 1945:



Pretoria Regiment in Italy:

Wokkafans is online now  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 20:22
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
Interesting that the photograph above claims to show the Pretoria Regiment which was the senior Armoured Regiment of the SA 6th Armoured Division in Italy. As the senior regiment, the circular squadron marking on the turret should be red (the Circle is for C Sqn). It seems a little light in colour to be red and is more likely Yellow which would make this tank from the junior regiment which for 6th AD would be the SA Special Service Brigade. For those interested, the middle regiment had blue markings and HQ units had a white diamond; A Sqn had a tri-Angle, and B sqn had a square (Box). (Armoured car units which had an extra "D" Sqn had a vertical solid wide bar).


The other way of checking is to look for the standard vehicle formation markings and number, but these are not on these particular vehicles. (The censor might have got to them which was not unusual for wartime photographs).


Oh the sadness of building tank dioramas for many years.

Last edited by Wensleydale; 8th Jul 2015 at 07:37.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2015, 20:46
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,966
Received 2,864 Likes on 1,228 Posts
I'm building. 1/16 Pz p38t ef at the moment Wensleydale, I then want the trumpeter 1/16 Panzer 4
NutLoose is offline  
Old 8th Jul 2015, 07:35
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,563
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
The problem with 1/16th scale is ...where to keep it once it's built. Most of my dioramas (1/35th) have gone by the wayside, and I have not been allowed to build another one for many years. I discovered that enamel paints, carpets, and a 3 year old did not mix well....and it was all my fault of course.
Wensleydale is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.