Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

New RAAF uniform

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

New RAAF uniform

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Jun 2002, 08:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure when the RAAF ended up with metal wings. I believe however the RAF don't wear wings on there blues shirt, but do on their jumper (or "Wooly Pully"). I'm sure some poms will correct me if I'm wrong!

My theory on how the wings thing will go:

Everyone EXCEPT pilots will have wings, and when you graduate pilots course, you pass your wings over to a new recruit
Pass-A-Frozo is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2002, 16:03
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
badges

the yanks have a confusing system with aircrew badges , believe it or not they all were the same flying badge! dont know about anyone else but surely there should be some difference between a pilot and a navigator/wsos badge? i get even more annoyed with the yanks for not allowing their ncos to wear rank badges on flying suits. as regards to metal wings i have seen some aircrew wearing them on shirts, but i dont think dress regs allow it. the army wear flying badges on shirts, but not on jumpers, not sure about navy.
canberra is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2002, 18:38
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not quite correct Canberra. The USAF wings are the same shape but the difference is what is in the middle. The pilots wings have a shield, WSO's have a fist grapping what looks like lightning bolts. Other categories have different symbols again. (It is impossible to tell until you are about 2 feet away).

The RAAF Nav full wing was introduced mainly as a recruiting measure, there was too much feedback that the single wing was seen as a big negative. The only RAAF navigators at the time who rushed to get one were WGCDRS and above in Canberra (desk jobs!). We had a petition running around as well but were basically told it was supported by the chief so dont bother fighting it.

As far as blues and drabs, drabs have always been optional.

The reason I thought the RAF dont wear wings on their blues shirts was so they could comfortably wear a flying suit over their uniform Saved time on a shower when time to go to the bar!
ftrplt is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2002, 13:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: no longer on the Pond
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Canada's the same, with the same wing but the centre symbol being different: maple leaf for pilots, globe and lightning bolt for nav's, 3 bolts for AESOps, and the rest. Unlike the USAF, at least you can see the difference from 10 feet.

I can see the recruiting argument, nobody actually joins to be a Nav...including me ! But the old eyeballs didn't pass muster. Helluva lot better being a Nav, than commanding tanks.

Kinda makes you wonder though, when such a seemingly small matter can cause such an uproar. When our SARTechs were 'upgraded' to a full wing, there was an uproar as well...except from the pilots in SAR work.

By the way, the new RAAF nav wing, is that the one with the southern cross in the centre?
Huron Topp is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2002, 21:03
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yank wings

sorry to tell you that yank wings are the same for all aircrew! i spoke to a usaf loadie a couple of years ago and he confirmed that all yank wings are the same. he said that he preferred the dare i say"imperial" system!
canberra is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2002, 07:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USAF wings

I was told by a USAF guy here that the central part of the badge gives the spec of the wearer- there is one with a vertical rocket, for example, worn by silo officers, navigators have a compass or something like that. For pilots, there is quite a distinctive set of wings with a star above it which designates "command pilot"status
chippy63 is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2002, 12:43
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
survey says..? BOMP BOWWWW!!!!!

Canberra, you're way off mate - as stated by (several) people previously USAF wings ARE different based on qualifications & experience/seniority.
The only problem is you need a websters dictionary, electron microscope & gas chromatograph to decipher the differences (ie anything outside of 2 feet in range renders all the badges the same).
Macchi is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2002, 13:19
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: no longer on the Pond
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
USAF wings

http://www.nametags4u.com/cgi-bin/ww...T&cat=airforce
Huron Topp is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2002, 13:54
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gee Canberra, in the 2 1/2 years I spent flying in a USAF fast jet SQN my eyes must have been lying to me.

Im glad you are able to clear it up for me. Thanks.

Me thinks your USAF loadie mate hasnt got close enough to the front end guys to notice a difference.
ftrplt is offline  
Old 28th Jun 2002, 17:21
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: no longer on the Pond
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps the term Aircrewman would be more appropriate here? All Aircrewman in the USAF have the same wing: loadies, refuellers etc.
Huron Topp is offline  
Old 29th Jun 2002, 08:12
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On the recruiting arguement..

If Joe Bloggs civy doesn't want to join as a NAV because he doesn't want a half wing, is he really motivated for the job?? Surely we are not changing a 15 cm badge for just plain recruiting purposes. I suspect that was the arguement advanced, however it is based not on logic!!
Pass-A-Frozo is offline  
Old 30th Jun 2002, 01:39
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Middle East
Posts: 1,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Left the RAAF in 95, the best 7 years off my life...after which worked in NZ and in the RNZAF Territoral Air Force (when there was an Air Attack Force!!).

Q. What is with Nav's wearing full Breve (wingy thing!!) or a similar word in French, it breaks all tradition and leaves the gates open for......FLGOFF Goopter the transport officer wearing a set of wings because his trucks refuel the odd C130 in Learmonth.......

Grip it up boys....and gals, we are not yanks and don't need to be walking around with so much medal and insignia palava on our uniforms that we need to call TNT worldwide removals every time we need to go on parade!!!!

Viper 10, 8 in the circuit, Report Initial......

Fox3snapshot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.