New RAAF uniform
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New RAAF uniform
I haven't been back to Oz for sometime, saw a few guys in the new RAAF uniform which is the same as it used to be in the good old days before we looked like bus conductors. All I can say is that it looks SH#T HOT. Well done to the person who instigated the change.
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Oz
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Priorities..??!?
The old uniform chestnut... Did you also happen to notice if the RAAFies were wearing the "operational readiness badge"? That is to say, the badge that states you're "ready for operations". (Funnily enough I always thought that's what the uniform meant).
I know that a uniform change is a cosmically small issue (financially) in comparison to wages and capital acquisitions, but every cynical bone in my body find's it amazing that ANY money was spent on this issue.
Yes, it's a far smarter and more distinctive uniform than the old - but will it cause the RAAF to perform its role any more efficiently or successfully? (They should've have gone the whole hog & bought Spitfires to match the uniforms.)
We have far more pressing issues - I for one would like to see chocolate bars back in the inflight rations!!! C'mon RAAFies, who's with me? Rally your CATOs & COs, we can make a difference
I know that a uniform change is a cosmically small issue (financially) in comparison to wages and capital acquisitions, but every cynical bone in my body find's it amazing that ANY money was spent on this issue.
Yes, it's a far smarter and more distinctive uniform than the old - but will it cause the RAAF to perform its role any more efficiently or successfully? (They should've have gone the whole hog & bought Spitfires to match the uniforms.)
We have far more pressing issues - I for one would like to see chocolate bars back in the inflight rations!!! C'mon RAAFies, who's with me? Rally your CATOs & COs, we can make a difference
Anyone got a web link so that those of us in Blighty can see what you're on about. Please don't get me started on the quality of our working dress. Let me throw this handgranade in for the Brits - metal (silver, pewter, whatever) wings for shirt sleeve dress? Yes or no? I vote definitley YES!
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Oz
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The new uniform actually allows the public to stop perceiving us as coppers and gives us some actual credit of being part of the military for once. I think it is S*** HOT also. The ceros are the best bit, apart from the $500 odd that you have to fork out to get them
Why don't we just agree upon 4 uniform standards:
1. Clockwork Soldier 95 for all non-aircrew branches as normal working dress. With tone-down national flag, name and unit badge.
2. New pattern flying suits in DPM (2 types - temperate and desert) with a mandatory pattern of wings/brevet with name, national flag, sqn badge (all in tone-down colours) for aircrew.
3. "No 1s" for parades/weddings/bollockings.
4. "No 5s" for Dining-In Nights with agreed pattern cummerbunds for all sqns/branches. Quite fancy a gold stripe down the side of the strides though!
....and once and for all get rid of the useless woolly pully in all its variants and 'No 2s'. Which just about describes the people who wear it...
1. Clockwork Soldier 95 for all non-aircrew branches as normal working dress. With tone-down national flag, name and unit badge.
2. New pattern flying suits in DPM (2 types - temperate and desert) with a mandatory pattern of wings/brevet with name, national flag, sqn badge (all in tone-down colours) for aircrew.
3. "No 1s" for parades/weddings/bollockings.
4. "No 5s" for Dining-In Nights with agreed pattern cummerbunds for all sqns/branches. Quite fancy a gold stripe down the side of the strides though!
....and once and for all get rid of the useless woolly pully in all its variants and 'No 2s'. Which just about describes the people who wear it...
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
new raaf uniform
ive looked on the raaf website. the only picture i could find was of a female wearing a blokes uniform at a gallipolli ceremony. i say a blokes uniform cos it had breast pockets and a belt. what is the badge worn on the right breast? it looks a lot like the badge the nazis wore on their uniform! i guess its the operational badge that some blokes have been on about. in reply to the previous comments about raf wearing cs95, oc ops at leuchars wanted to do this but was slapped down by co. apparently air force board have said that we are to wear blue, so why are flying suits and ground crew coveralls green?
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even more importantantly.
Why do Nav's get a double wing? I hope Air Defence OFficers get the same wing navs do. That will **** 'em.
Why do we have to wear the RAAF ensign when flying around Australia and get a bollocking if we wear the Aussie flag. We are not allowed to wear a flying suit off base, and everyone on base should know that we are in the RAAF.
PAF
Why do Nav's get a double wing? I hope Air Defence OFficers get the same wing navs do. That will **** 'em.
Why do we have to wear the RAAF ensign when flying around Australia and get a bollocking if we wear the Aussie flag. We are not allowed to wear a flying suit off base, and everyone on base should know that we are in the RAAF.
PAF
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Canberra,
The badge on the right is the "ORB": the "Operational Readiness Badge" signifying the wearer is deployable. That is:
1) They can recognise a service rifle
2) They can run their annual PFT faster than the CAF (not easy, actually. The Boss is pretty fit)
3) Ummmm, a whole bunch of other stuff.
I always thought wearing the uniform meant I was deployable. Apparently, that is not enough these days. It is part of the push to give everyone a badge. Some call it the Order of the Blunt Eagle.
When it was introduced various theories were bandied around in regard to its design ranging from similarity to that worn by a certain European air arm from the last century to comment that it looks like a wedge tailed eagle with impressively large testicles.
Pass-a-Frozo,
I remenber the uproar when the new nav wings were introduced. I was on pilots course at the time. The first we heard of it was when an irate QFI came into our classroom brandishing a piece of paper, a petition against the new wings, saying "Sign this or you're all scrubbed". We pointed out that signing a petition is tantamount to mutiny and we could all be shot at dawn, but signed anyway. Pretty cocky of us really: we hadn't qualified to wear a pilots badge and we were dictating to others.
I understand (could be wrong here...) that the nav badge is actually an "Officer Non-Pilot Aircrew" badge, so is worn by navs, AEO's and soon to worn by AirDefendO's when 2 SQN gets airborne.
For the record, I get chocky bars and bickies in my in-flights. For a good day out we get off base accomodation and a crew van for the use of.
The badge on the right is the "ORB": the "Operational Readiness Badge" signifying the wearer is deployable. That is:
1) They can recognise a service rifle
2) They can run their annual PFT faster than the CAF (not easy, actually. The Boss is pretty fit)
3) Ummmm, a whole bunch of other stuff.
I always thought wearing the uniform meant I was deployable. Apparently, that is not enough these days. It is part of the push to give everyone a badge. Some call it the Order of the Blunt Eagle.
When it was introduced various theories were bandied around in regard to its design ranging from similarity to that worn by a certain European air arm from the last century to comment that it looks like a wedge tailed eagle with impressively large testicles.
Pass-a-Frozo,
I remenber the uproar when the new nav wings were introduced. I was on pilots course at the time. The first we heard of it was when an irate QFI came into our classroom brandishing a piece of paper, a petition against the new wings, saying "Sign this or you're all scrubbed". We pointed out that signing a petition is tantamount to mutiny and we could all be shot at dawn, but signed anyway. Pretty cocky of us really: we hadn't qualified to wear a pilots badge and we were dictating to others.
I understand (could be wrong here...) that the nav badge is actually an "Officer Non-Pilot Aircrew" badge, so is worn by navs, AEO's and soon to worn by AirDefendO's when 2 SQN gets airborne.
For the record, I get chocky bars and bickies in my in-flights. For a good day out we get off base accomodation and a crew van for the use of.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Surditas,
I was on pilots course at the time as well and remember the "encouragement" well.
I think the Nav's will send up a roar when Airdefendo's etc. are walking around with the same badge. Mind you, it's not the new navs' fault. You'll have to look at old WGCDR's in Canberra for that.
"Anywhere, anytime, so long as it's off base"
PAF
I was on pilots course at the time as well and remember the "encouragement" well.
I think the Nav's will send up a roar when Airdefendo's etc. are walking around with the same badge. Mind you, it's not the new navs' fault. You'll have to look at old WGCDR's in Canberra for that.
"Anywhere, anytime, so long as it's off base"
PAF
Join Date: May 2002
Location: preston
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aussie badges
thanks for answer on that badge. raf has talked for years about every trade having a badge but so far nothing. one thing i noticed when at butterworth was the differences in uniform in the raaf ie some in khaki and some in blue , why? in the raf if we're serving in the tropics everyone wears khaki. as a final point on the raaf website they spelt air marshal with two l's!!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can wear Khaki (Drabs) or Blues, as you wish. As for the two L's . Pick who's been using civilian contractors
A bit off the topic. But why do they bother with a Return of Service Obligation if I can just do 29 situps and get out
A bit off the topic. But why do they bother with a Return of Service Obligation if I can just do 29 situps and get out
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pass-a-frozo,
What course were you? I was 180.
Canberra,
"Air Marshall"? God, how embarrassment. Pass-a-frozo is right. Our recruiting is now done by a civvy contractor called "Manpower". Need I say more?
What course were you? I was 180.
Canberra,
"Air Marshall"? God, how embarrassment. Pass-a-frozo is right. Our recruiting is now done by a civvy contractor called "Manpower". Need I say more?
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: no longer on the Pond
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From '68-'87 all Canadian branches had a green, garbage-bag-coloured uniform. Changed back to "elemental" uniforms, but the Air Force one has never seemed to me, to be quite the right colour. Closer to the old RAAF colour, than the RAF. Better than the green, anyway.
As for the "double wing", since about '52, all full-time aircrew have worn a double-wing. In other words, anyone whose trade was an aircrew trade. Others, like Air Weapons Controllers, TacHel Observers, Flight Surgeons, Flight Nurses and Loadmasters are seconded from the primary duties, so they have a different wing. Has 2 wings, but they are upswept and kind of hug the wreath at the centre.
A couple of years ago, Loadies' wings became the normal double-wing. I've been out of blue for awhile, but my understanding is that they can now be full-time aircrew, but are still part of the Logistics trade.
I'm an ex-Nav, so I never quite understood the whole half-wing debate. I don't think everyone should have a wing insignia, but full-time aircrew certainly should. Canada has a half-wing worn on the right breast for basically every trade now, and it seems to me they've gone overboard.
In the U.S., EVERBODY has something, but then again, I guess they figure they need another addition to the fruit salad they have.
As for the "double wing", since about '52, all full-time aircrew have worn a double-wing. In other words, anyone whose trade was an aircrew trade. Others, like Air Weapons Controllers, TacHel Observers, Flight Surgeons, Flight Nurses and Loadmasters are seconded from the primary duties, so they have a different wing. Has 2 wings, but they are upswept and kind of hug the wreath at the centre.
A couple of years ago, Loadies' wings became the normal double-wing. I've been out of blue for awhile, but my understanding is that they can now be full-time aircrew, but are still part of the Logistics trade.
I'm an ex-Nav, so I never quite understood the whole half-wing debate. I don't think everyone should have a wing insignia, but full-time aircrew certainly should. Canada has a half-wing worn on the right breast for basically every trade now, and it seems to me they've gone overboard.
In the U.S., EVERBODY has something, but then again, I guess they figure they need another addition to the fruit salad they have.
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
metal wings
On the topic of wings...anyone know when and why the RAAF ended up with metal wings? Have the Poms ever had them and what is the current reason for not having them? I suspect it is something to do with having a sanitised uniform but that is purely a guess.