Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Royal air force 63 and 19 squadron leaders from 1980 until 1994

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Royal air force 63 and 19 squadron leaders from 1980 until 1994

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Mar 2015, 15:53
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I cannot comment on RAF Chivenor as I did not have the pleasure of serving there.
However, pointing out the importance of grammar and correct spelling does have some value, especially to the young. If nothing else, it demonstrates that such things do matter to some people, potential employers for example.
I say this, having had a number of years teaching technical subjects.
Eg: graduating students completing questionnaire about the 2 year technical program they have finished. One (of the better ones) shouts out to his fellow students " how do you spell 'red'? Me: (not supposed to be present, but trying to expedite said survey so they don't waste valuable class time) " What do you mean Trevor, what are you trying to say?" Student replies " I want to say 'they (College) should get 'red' of the English course".
Sums things up nicely for me.
BTW I always say I was in the 'are ay eff", as opposed to the 'rafff'. I assume that is the preferred pronunciation.
bike2lv is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 16:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Lechlade, Glos.UK
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Very good point Bomber ... possibly

ps , in my time at Chivenor (1980 - 83), the Squadrons were 63 & 151(F) 19 did not exist .
sharpend is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 16:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Nice points about "youngsters" and grammar, but you might check the OP's posted age.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 17:49
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: essex
Age: 76
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the OP is really 48 that was just about when they stopped teaching grammar and spelling because it destroyed the little darlings 'creativity', so now we have a generation of people who have no idea what grammar is let alone what the rules are and as for spelling it's just a free for all, I suppose we should thankful that he is not using 'text speak'
mikip is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 20:51
  #25 (permalink)  
si.
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northumberland
Age: 52
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm a little younger than the OP, yet we were still taught proper grammar and spelling whilst at school. Although that's not to say I'd claim my grammar was perfect, and I do make mistakes. (Before anyone finds one in this post.)

I do however wonder how English is taught in the modern education system, as I frequently feel compelled to correct my Daughters. It could be argued correct English is almost their second language, yet they all achieved good GCSE grades in both language and literature.
si. is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 21:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that English is taught perfectly well in the modern education system. However there are so many external influences at work on today's youngsters that the learning of good English is seriously influenced by what they see on TV and of course parents of the txt spk generation.

My children are in their thirties. Both speak and write with accuracy; so do my grandchildren, albeit within the ability of their age group.
thing is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 22:03
  #27 (permalink)  
si.
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northumberland
Age: 52
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst I can't comment on the standards regarding education, I whole heartedly agree concerning other influences. The volume of American television programmes broadcast on a certain satellite Company's system, often leads to a 'discussion' about mispronunciation of English words...

Apologies for the thread drift.

Last edited by si.; 21st Mar 2015 at 22:04. Reason: Apologies.
si. is offline  
Old 21st Mar 2015, 23:42
  #28 (permalink)  
O-P
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Personally, I can't remember doing any staff work, or for that matter worrying about the next comma, when I chased down Jags at 250' and 600kts.


For that matter, I didn't give a crap about it once I'd landed either. Those that got really upset about it, in my opinion, weren't the best boys in the real game.


English is blessed by its flexible rules and willingness to change. Just look at French if you wish to be pedantic.


chiv hawk got is point across. I don't care for those that snipe from their high horse, I'm sure I could make them look like utter fools in a discipline other than English.


O-P

Last edited by O-P; 22nd Mar 2015 at 00:09.
O-P is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 11:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Not far from a lot of solar panels.
Posts: 174
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Squadron leader J A Hall was OC No 151 Squadron in July 1984.
Null Orifice is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 15:12
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: In the middle
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I was on 63 Sqn in the early 80's we had Rapier not Hawks
4ROCK is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 16:58
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the Fence
Age: 71
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Sharpend,

Correction,

19(F) Sqn did exist in 1980-83 as a Front Line Sqn operating Phantom FGR2's in RAFG!
Dominator2 is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 21:39
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
No closer to helping the OP with his question here, although the stear towards previous threads should help.

One big thread drift I cannot resist.

Originally Posted by 4Rock
When I was on 63 Sqn in the early 80's we had Rapier not Hawks
QCS. Who introduced Continuity Drill to QCS?
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 21:55
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In 1920's.. at Uxbridge (I assume) - RAF apprentices, Guards Division, L of A maybe?

I was once told I was too ugly for QCS, fact. And too short. I would sue now.
Al R is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 22:03
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Too ugly for QCS? Al R, take them to court.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 22:27
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They had a point mind.

At the time, I remember walking in Dodge, at Aki, and my FS walking up behind me and putting his dog lead in my rather trendy 1985 earring before nearly pulling my lobe off. "You want to look like a dog, Rush, he hissed, ".. and I'll treat you like a dog". The years dull the pain and the memory, I think he may have spiced the vernacular a little. It was him who gave me my aesthetic critique too.

Great bloke though, seriously.
Al R is offline  
Old 22nd Mar 2015, 22:58
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Love that story, Al. Still have the earring?

Anyway, I think continuity drill for QCS was around 1960. Anyone help with that?
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 08:57
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,819
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Al R wrote:
I was once told I was too ugly for QCS, fact. And too short. I would sue now.
During his time on 14GE at the Towers, the late Don Turbitt was once told by his rather wet IOT Flt Cdr that he had 'unofficer-like bone structure'...

When we had the entry photo taken at graduation, Don was positioned by the photographer at some point amongst the assembled throng - only for 'someone' to call out "Not him - he's got unofficer-like bone structure!", much to the chagrin of the to$$er who'd made the original accusation - and was sitting with the rest of the Flt Cdrs in the photo....

Re QCS continuity drill, for one moment I thought you meant that rifle-twirling thing the Spams seem to love:


Last edited by BEagle; 23rd Mar 2015 at 09:46.
BEagle is online now  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 09:30
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
When I was on 63 Sqn in the early 80's we had Rapier not Hawks
And in the 60s when I was in they had these:

Similarly when I was on 37 Sqn we had Land Rovers, not Shackletons (as Shack37 already knows).
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 09:40
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Courtney, long lost! I would restart but my kids would probably disown me.

Now there's a plan.

Beagle, I once had a particularly vindictive and useless Flt Cdr who said of me and my deportment (in one of my 6000); "Cpl Rush, when visiting the unit in his time off, can sometimes dress unsuitably, much like a biker might".

My successful redress pointed out that my transport at the time was a Honda VFR750 FT.
Al R is offline  
Old 23rd Mar 2015, 09:56
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
During his time on 14GE at the Towers, the late Don Turbitt was once told by his rather wet IOT Flt Cdr that he had 'unofficer-like bone structure'...
Then there was the 99 Cadet Entry Inter-Squadron Ugly competition, where "A" Squadron's entry was disqualified on the grounds of his being a professional.
Haraka is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.