Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

230 Sqn shenannigans?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

230 Sqn shenannigans?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 11:28
  #81 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Odiham
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agreed. He wasn't guilty, he never was. I hope that those who falsely claimed against him will now be prosecuted with the full might of military law....but I doubt that will happen. He lost his Sqn, he may get another chance but it will still affect his career. Loyalty goes both ways. Good luck Wg Cdr Baron, it would be a pleasure to fly with you again
wokkamate is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 13:11
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Here n there.
Posts: 905
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
So did it never happen and two JO's colluded to cook up a 'cock' and bull story..or was it hi-jinks that got out of hand?
Hueymeister is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 13:56
  #83 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
Any link to the result and/or a report? AB was known to me and to (at least!) one of the Teeterettes.......

They were aware of the CM and will be pleased with the result.

Couldn't find anything on Google.
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 15:40
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,457
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
I doubt he will get his sqn back - the new chap is well settled and a Nav to boot!

There has always been a problem with the British justice system and it is coming to the fore again with the recent shed load of ancient sexual claims. The accused is named, the accuser is not - that can't right. We have seen recently a number of accusers being prosecuted themselves for making false claims.

That said, a complaint must be investigated and the prosecuting authority must have had reasonable grounds to believe that a conviction could be secured based on the evidence offered, otherwise it would not have gone to trial. In the interim, the person being investigated cannot remain in post because, unlike civvy street, the accused and his accusers live and work in the same place.

Old Duffer
Old-Duffer is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 16:01
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
O-D - agree, but in this instance, the Sunday Times published the names of those making the accusations (2nd paragraph in the story the OP linked)
Archimedes is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 16:30
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,047
Received 2,920 Likes on 1,249 Posts
Nothing to stop him now suing them for loss of potential earnings, rank etc?

I would insist any mention to the Court Marshal is expunged from his records etc, because like it or not, even though found not guilty, it will still follow him around like a bad fart..
NutLoose is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 17:46
  #87 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
I would insist any mention to the Court Martial is expunged from his records etc
But sadly Nutty - unlike the Men in Black - you can't expunge it from memories.....

...... and equally sadly, despite the verdict, there will be those who say "no smoke without fire"
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 18:01
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
Isn't it about now that someone mentions the tales I used to hear of Naval Officers who were CM'ed, and as a result lost seniority which put them back into the promotion bracket, and they were then subsequently promoted.....

Or was that a myth?
Biggus is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2015, 18:38
  #89 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
Or was that a myth?
Ask Alan West
In 1986, while working on the Naval Staff at the Ministry of Defence, West left documents detailing large cuts to the Navy on a canal towpath. These documents were recovered and then published by a journalist from the Mail on Sunday. At a subsequent court martial West pleaded guilty to charges of negligence and breaching security.He explained that they had fallen from his coat pocket whilst walking a friend's dog. West was issued with a severe reprimand, the second lightest sentence available. The severe reprimand that he received was time expired before he became eligible for promotion to flag rank.
And he finished up a 4*, 1SL, a lord, GCB and a Privy Councillor!
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2015, 05:40
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 1,457
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Yes, the RN did have people who forfeited seniority and moved back into the promotion zone of Lt Cdr to Cdr and that was when the zone was clearly defined and I understand no longer operates

The Navy also had "The Feast of the Passover". This was a thrash held when one was passed over and hence moved out of the promotion zone.

O-D
Old-Duffer is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2015, 14:19
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just come across this again - good to read.

Recollect attending a predominantly mil Burns Supper where a guest (I suspect not mil) took exception to one of the speakers who, I can assure you, was very moderate in his content and delivery. Fortunately matters did not progress beyond words at the end of the dining room.
Nowt as queer as fowk.
Basil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.