F4C versus MIG21
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Cliques have rules. MA is pretty tolerant; look at the number of private rooms in Prune.
IMHO MA gains from its openness (within limits)
IMHO MA gains from its openness (within limits)
Mel,
I take your point, but I've just been looking back through the thread and apart from post 9, which basically said that MiG pilots acquitted themselves well, and a couple of remarks rubbishing others' posts, he didn't actually contribute anything to the "discussion". It was more about stereo typing Vietnamese and what you're saying is wrong, but you can believe what you want. I think he was starting to behave quite badly (haven't we all occasionally?) and to dominate the thread in such a way that there was no aviation discussion about the subject.
Worth a ban? Not for me to say, but someone obviously thought so and the mods must have agreed. Perhaps too close to trolling from someone already banned.
Pontius Nav,
I see your point too. In the main I don't care much who posts here as long as they are reasonable about it and don't try to pretend to be something they clearly are not. Sometimes the exit door is for people that simply won't listen and try to wind folks up.
But as I said, it's not for me to say.
Courtney
I take your point, but I've just been looking back through the thread and apart from post 9, which basically said that MiG pilots acquitted themselves well, and a couple of remarks rubbishing others' posts, he didn't actually contribute anything to the "discussion". It was more about stereo typing Vietnamese and what you're saying is wrong, but you can believe what you want. I think he was starting to behave quite badly (haven't we all occasionally?) and to dominate the thread in such a way that there was no aviation discussion about the subject.
Worth a ban? Not for me to say, but someone obviously thought so and the mods must have agreed. Perhaps too close to trolling from someone already banned.
Pontius Nav,
I see your point too. In the main I don't care much who posts here as long as they are reasonable about it and don't try to pretend to be something they clearly are not. Sometimes the exit door is for people that simply won't listen and try to wind folks up.
But as I said, it's not for me to say.
Courtney
Stop being so damned reasonable Courtney! ;-)
I understand that Mr Noritake rubbed folks up the wrong way and may not have been viewed as adding to the discussion, but unlike a lot of folks he stated his case with a great deal of humour and brushed off personal jibes with a certain aplomb that I found endearing as well as highly entertaining. He certainly wasn't being offensive, IMHO.
Anyway, merry Christmas.
I understand that Mr Noritake rubbed folks up the wrong way and may not have been viewed as adding to the discussion, but unlike a lot of folks he stated his case with a great deal of humour and brushed off personal jibes with a certain aplomb that I found endearing as well as highly entertaining. He certainly wasn't being offensive, IMHO.
Anyway, merry Christmas.
Sorry to see him go in some ways.
I know nothing much at all about flying F4s, F5s or MiG 21s ( mainly only being involved over some years in specifying, hanging on and/or exploiting recce kit on all three of these aircraft species around the world).
There will always be opposing points of view and I echoed his sentiments regarding too readily "writing off" the other side's aircraft and capabilities.
I remember reading a U.K. assessment of the Me 109 from the late 1930's, in which it was described as " that inferior product". ( I will not engage in the
Me /Bf canard)
Nothing changes.
Happy Christmas and best wishes to all.
I know nothing much at all about flying F4s, F5s or MiG 21s ( mainly only being involved over some years in specifying, hanging on and/or exploiting recce kit on all three of these aircraft species around the world).
There will always be opposing points of view and I echoed his sentiments regarding too readily "writing off" the other side's aircraft and capabilities.
I remember reading a U.K. assessment of the Me 109 from the late 1930's, in which it was described as " that inferior product". ( I will not engage in the
Me /Bf canard)Nothing changes.
Happy Christmas and best wishes to all.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shame he's been banned. The thread had potential.
If you're going to opine then it helps to back up statements. That way we'd all be entertained and perhaps learn something.
This may make you laugh or groan, or both.
MiG-21: People?s fighter or plane dangerous? | Russia & India Report
If you're going to opine then it helps to back up statements. That way we'd all be entertained and perhaps learn something.
This may make you laugh or groan, or both.
MiG-21: People?s fighter or plane dangerous? | Russia & India Report
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
The YouTube video earlier showing various simulations illustrated one drawbacks the Mig 21- the canopy arch blocking forward vision and one post-mission analysis suggested that in a successful interception of 4x4 F105 that the Mig pilot had seen 3 of the formations.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I can't imagine, having never sat in one, that the visibility was fabulous from a F-4, seems to have a significant amount of iron mongery to get in the way. That being said, in the Sea Jet, Harrier and Super a Hornet there was a canopy bow and I never once wished it wasn't there...one would have to be quite clever to sneak up in someone using nothing but a canopy bow for cover!
Originally Posted by melmothw
I understand that Mr Noritake rubbed folks up the wrong way and may not have been viewed as adding to the discussion, but unlike a lot of folks he stated his case with a great deal of humour and brushed off personal jibes with a certain aplomb that I found endearing as well as highly entertaining. He certainly wasn't being offensive, IMHO.
Merry Xmas, peace and goodwill to all.
Vitesse,
Thank you for your link; I really enjoyed reading the article. There was a lot of scuttlebutt after Cope India 04 and, I think, a lot of misunderstanding. It very much suited the press and the IAF to highlight the stats such as 9:1 kill ratio in their favour and a 90% "success" rate. What they didn't tell you was the nature of the set up for the exercise.
It was nothing much to do with the lack of AESA radar in the F-15, it was a lot more to do with the fact that 15s were given no BVR weapons capability and the engagements were largely in the order of 6v18. That's what they signed up to.
Now, I have to say that they also underestimated the IAF capability (it wasn't only MiG21) and the IAF's tactics were both good and adaptive. But the outcomes have to be viewed with the criteria in mind.
Courtney
Thank you for your link; I really enjoyed reading the article. There was a lot of scuttlebutt after Cope India 04 and, I think, a lot of misunderstanding. It very much suited the press and the IAF to highlight the stats such as 9:1 kill ratio in their favour and a 90% "success" rate. What they didn't tell you was the nature of the set up for the exercise.
It was nothing much to do with the lack of AESA radar in the F-15, it was a lot more to do with the fact that 15s were given no BVR weapons capability and the engagements were largely in the order of 6v18. That's what they signed up to.
Now, I have to say that they also underestimated the IAF capability (it wasn't only MiG21) and the IAF's tactics were both good and adaptive. But the outcomes have to be viewed with the criteria in mind.
Courtney
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Orca, IIRC, the Mig retained a very thick bullet proof glass windshield as protection from the B52 tail gun. This didn't help with the visibility.
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Outside the Fence
Age: 71
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
4 Posts
Orca,
The vis from the F4 was much better than from many ac of that generation. The view from the RCP of the F4B was poor but later models were improved, slightly. Remember that if the opponent flew a constant aspect attack they may remain behind the canopy bow until impact. Another good reason for not flying in straight lines!
I see that after a dodgey start you eventually flew a real jet!
The vis from the F4 was much better than from many ac of that generation. The view from the RCP of the F4B was poor but later models were improved, slightly. Remember that if the opponent flew a constant aspect attack they may remain behind the canopy bow until impact. Another good reason for not flying in straight lines!
I see that after a dodgey start you eventually flew a real jet!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't disagree with your point about geometry Dominator, having briefed countless times to keep the intercept on collision to avoid tracking in the canopy - I just think it's a bit much blaming 'No Joy' on the bow. You can move your head or the jet's nose and I personally think that atmospherics and background are far more significant.
The funny thing about all this is that we have very few data points for actual jet vs jet combat and, as done to death by others, it's never a straight answer.
The Sea Harrier for example wasn't miles better than the Mirage, Dagger and A-4...but a combination of jet, aircrew, fuel, fighter control, tactics, 9-Lima and primary role saw the only data point go in the Sea Harrier's favour. Did the world rush out to buy them...errr, no....and rightly so.
The funny thing about all this is that we have very few data points for actual jet vs jet combat and, as done to death by others, it's never a straight answer.
The Sea Harrier for example wasn't miles better than the Mirage, Dagger and A-4...but a combination of jet, aircrew, fuel, fighter control, tactics, 9-Lima and primary role saw the only data point go in the Sea Harrier's favour. Did the world rush out to buy them...errr, no....and rightly so.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There was a lot of scuttlebutt after Cope India 04
I've read some opinions which differ slightly from the article and I think there was a return match? I liked some of the quotes in the piece.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Great Midwest
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At last report, a fair number of Iranian Phantoms are still in service in the attack and antiship role, kept flying by the clandestine acquisition of spares, as well as considerable local ingenuity in the reverse-engineering and manufacture of such spares. It is said to have around 65 flyable F-4E Phantom II aircraft mainly based at 3rd Hamedan, 6th Bushehr and 9th Bandar Abbas tactical fighter bases, with a few aging F-4D aircraft based in Chahbahar 10th AB.
The Hellenic Air Force operates 12 RF-4Es and 34 F-4Es. The Hellenic Air Force participated at the Malta International Airshow with an F-4E PI 2000 Phantom II from Andravida Air Force Base in Greece. This will be the second time Greece participates at the air show, having sent another Phantom II in 2005. The air show took place over the weekend of Sept. 27-28.
Turkey is one of the largest F-4 Phantom operators in the world and has used its aircraft in bombing raids against Kurdish forces along the Iraqi border. All of turkey’s aircraft were heavily upgraded by Israel which has greatly enhanced the aircraft’s capabilities. Turkey continues to use the RF-4 as its main reconnaissance aircraft and it was in this role that one of its planes was shot down by Syria in June 2012, almost bringing the two countries into conflict. As recent as April 2014, a Turkish RF-4 Phantom was involved in an altercation with Greek fighter aircraft when it was conducting operations over the Aegean Sea. Turkey continues to purchase newer and more modern fighter designs but the F-4 phantom will continue to be an important part of its air force for at least the next decade.
http://www.byronhartshorn.com
The Collins Foundation currently has an F-4D available for air shows.
McDonnell F-4D Phantom II - The Collings Foundation
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Japan (RF-4E Kai / RF-4EJ Kai / F-4EJ Kai / F-4EJ), South Korea (F-4E) and the USAF (QF-4E / QRF-4C) can also be added to the F-4 current users list as well, although the USAF only uses them as manned/un-manned drones. So, the MiG-21 clearly HASN'T won the longevity prize yet... Oh, and the civilian F-4D owned and operated by the, Collings Foundation, will hopefully be joined by one of the early pre-production models this year, operated by another civilian outfit.
-RP
-RP
My friend Skip Holm who flew F-105's and F-4's in Vietnam and subsequently flew Mig-21's in the USAF 'quiet' program told me that if we knew how good the Mig-21 really was we would have been a lot more scared...He said it was outstanding to fly and certainly capable of outmanoeuvring the types flown by the USAF/USN there....Skip did the test flying as well on the F-117...
Skip's bio:
Skip James Holm (born February 22, 1944) is a retired pilot who lives on the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevada.
Holm claims to hold the world record for combat flight hours: 1,172. He retired from the U.S. Air Force Reserve in 1992, with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. He logged his combat hours flying F-105s and F-4s in the Vietnam War. After three tours of duty in Vietnam, he joined Lockheed Skunk Works and test piloted the experimental and production F-117s.
Holm participated in the Reno Air Races since 1981. He has won in the Unlimited class of piston-engined aircraft in 1984, 2000, 2002 and 2003. Holm performed as stand-in pilot in The Right Stuff and Hot Shots!.
Skip James Holm (born February 22, 1944) is a retired pilot who lives on the eastern slope of the Sierra Nevada.
Holm claims to hold the world record for combat flight hours: 1,172. He retired from the U.S. Air Force Reserve in 1992, with the rank of Lieutenant Colonel. He logged his combat hours flying F-105s and F-4s in the Vietnam War. After three tours of duty in Vietnam, he joined Lockheed Skunk Works and test piloted the experimental and production F-117s.
Holm participated in the Reno Air Races since 1981. He has won in the Unlimited class of piston-engined aircraft in 1984, 2000, 2002 and 2003. Holm performed as stand-in pilot in The Right Stuff and Hot Shots!.
Last edited by TBM-Legend; 27th Dec 2014 at 01:41.