Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

OP 'TIL WE DROP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Dec 2014, 09:18
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: 4 Civvy Street. Nowhere-near-a-base. The Shires.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ginster

... I didn't mean Al Udeid
camelspyyder is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 09:31
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Just This Once wrote:
Nice cycle of Q, support to NATO, FI then AFG then Q....
Facing a similar cycle for the foreseeable, it doesn't surprise me that those with A330 / A350XWB Type Ratings on their licences will be studying the ba websites pretty closely over the next few months......
BEagle is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 09:43
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Essex
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A mere 16 out of 102 aircraft are fitted with complete suite of operational equipment; the so called Diamond Fleet!
On one hand, well, quite. On the other hand, I was once told on this very forum that in order to deploy one aircraft, a force such as the RAF needed to have five, to account for maintenance, training, R&R for the crews, etc. Now, I'd be the first to admit I've no idea how this applies to the 16-of-102 scenario described here, but it occurs to me that under the most liberal interpretation, the ready-to-go count would should only be about 20.

No?

P
Phil_R is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 09:43
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
From the Sunday Times article:-

BRITAIN is considering sending warplanes back to Afghanistan, six weeks after it officially ended its war in the country, after two direct pleas from the country’s president to David Cameron. A British general told The Sunday Times that he expected more troops and fast jets to be sent next year in what would be seen as an admission that Britain had withdrawn too quickly.

A senior RAF officer also revealed that plans and costings have been drawn up to send back the squadron of Tornados that recently returned from Afghanistan or a squadron of Typhoons to help Afghan troops.

That sort of deployment would require support from about 70 troops. Unmanned Reaper drones are another option to provide air support for Afghan troops, amid reports that the security situation is deteriorating so fast that it is making the levels of casualties unsustainable.

The Afghans have lost more than 4,500 men in the past year — more than Nato forces lost in the whole 13 years of the war. This year is on course to be the deadliest of the conflict so far.

“We always knew that air support was a problem,” said the general, who described the Afghan army as still “three years away from having their own air force”.

“What’s happened in Iraq combined with the spike in attacks in Afghanistan — and a wish to help the new government — has made everyone rethink.”

Abdullah Abdullah, the No 2 in the Afghan government, told The Sunday Times during a visit to London last week that international forces were leaving too early, particularly as a lot of time was lost this year because of hostility between Hamid Karzai, the former president, and western leaders.

“It is too abrupt,” Abdullah said. “Two years ago we had 150,000 international troops and lots of jets and helicopters. Within two months there will be just 12,000. We need air support for the medical evacuation of casualties, intelligence and fast jets.”

Downing Street last night denied that any decision had been made to send equipment and men to Afghanistan, saying the prime minister’s preference is that allies such as the United States, Germany and Turkey should help out instead.
Deep joy - a return to Camp Bastion. That will really raise morale...
Lyneham Lad is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 09:56
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ginster
... I didn't mean Al Udeid
Neither did I

...but if the cap fits

Last edited by Uncle Ginsters; 7th Dec 2014 at 17:16.
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 11:52
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 1,371
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Deep joy - a return to Camp Bastion. That will really raise morale...
A timely reminder for this....
Wrathmonk is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 12:00
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Lancashire
Age: 48
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How come the military leaders never speak out? Whether it's poor equipment, illegal BS wars, lack of goal, poor funding etc

I bet they're worried about the pensions and their next jobs.

W@nker$
Thelma Viaduct is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 12:35
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Southend
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a very old ex resident of Akrotiri, after the Turkish invasion and most squadrons had gone home, Akrotiri was a great posting! Nobody seemed to know how long we were staying, messing was excellent, and It was one of the better postings even then. I'm horrified at the descriptions of the present day Akrotiri I've read here, it sounds very run down! Slipping standards are one thing but this sounds like a waterfall!


When PAYD was first mooted I was all for it as our then shift patterns meant we were paying for meals we weren't having. It seemed a good idea then, but I'm sure if wed known what it would have led to I'm sure we wouldn't have been that eager!


The first PAYD civilian run Airmens Mess that I met was at Northolt and it wasn't all that clever after being used to having a fully staffed catering squadron, I do remember the small portions and slow service! I can well believe that there was no hot food for shift workers at a privatised Akrotiri, they didn't have any either when we were working a night shift at Northolt. Its all contracts and profit margins instead of the service we were used to.


That's it Geriatric grump over.

Last edited by Bill4a; 7th Dec 2014 at 12:37. Reason: too many commas
Bill4a is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 13:43
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: in my combat underpants
Age: 53
Posts: 1,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Admit it chaps, the modern RAF isn't really a part of the MoD. Merely a self licking lollipop that attempts to portray itself as the most important justification as to why it still requires a huge budget to ensure Britain remains free and the other two services should be subsumed to create an uber-Air Force
For someone who claims to have been around Air Power for so long, you have a wonderfully biased and blinkered view of the whole thing. The RAF has been defending it's position as something other than a sub-set of the RN / Army for aeons. It defends that position against those ignorant of Air Power and it's role(s). The RAF has long done itself no favours in this regard, yet it remains where it should be.
I worked very much Tri-Service for most of my career. Whilst the Army has some excellent people, it suffers from self-justification, not invented here syndrome and too many thrusting Colonels (or Cap Badge Mentality) for it's own good. Too many people also thinking that tough conditions breed better results. They don't. They just wear people out far quicker and degrade their performance. Any fool can be uncomfortable.
Mr C Hinecap is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 14:39
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: South of Old Warden
Age: 87
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cheese Sandwiches! It'll be powdered eggs next, do you know what I mean?

goudie is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 16:28
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pastures new
Posts: 354
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Wg13_dummy, at least your colleagues will never have to suffer eating cheese sarnies with all those chips you're carrying around on your shoulders
kintyred is offline  
Old 7th Dec 2014, 18:57
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Yeovil, England
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It used to be Fly Navy - Walk Army - Eat Crab, the first has pretty much gone, the second now go by APC and the third reduced to Cheeese sarnies, whatever next!
goffered again is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 13:11
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,459
Received 34 Likes on 20 Posts
The sarnies saga takes me back to an exercise in Germany in the mid seventies.
After over a week of appalling weather and living on compo the squadron morale wasn't great.
The cook was getting sick and tired of the whining and headed of to complain to the CO or so we thought.

Nothing was said but the following day the CO appears with the cook in tow. All the pax seats were removed from an aircraft and the CO and cook launched off.
On their return we off loaded a stack of hay box's (alloy food containers) full of steaks, pork chops and other goodies.

For one day only but nevertheless a major boost to morale. Maybe we just had a better class of officer in those days and also a fine cook.
ericferret is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 14:16
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
has made everyone rethink.
.. has made everyone think ..fixed that
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 14:31
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,131
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
My terms and conditions that I signed up to have been altered beyond all recognition, I wasn't told that my entire career would be ops in the Middle East...
the_easy_life,

If you joined up before 11/09/2001 then who knew to inform you? If you joined up after, then it wouldn't have taken a rocket scientist to have guessed where you'd be spending most of your time.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 20:46
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Exiled in England
Age: 48
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, Arrse have over forty pages of comical piss takes and abuse.....

Well done lads, the RAF now look even closer to what was it?

Ah, yes.

The militant wing of EasyJet.
Command screw ups aside, how low have we sunk that the NCO's can't organise hot food themselves present a sarcastic invoice to the MoD.....

Improvise gents, ship out a BBQ, do something.......
Any fool can be uncomfortable.
cornish-stormrider is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 20:59
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Age: 91
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RAF Fayid in the Suez Canal Zone, 1950's, such poor catering in the Airmen's Mess that there was a 'Boycott-Meals Strike'. Staff from the Woes 'n Joes Mess transferred, meals at W&J's suffered. Two enterprising mess members organised an evening catering establishment (a hut) which sold freshly-cooked egg sarnies at competitive prices. Problem solved!
ValMORNA is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 21:09
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Well, Arrse have over forty pages of comical piss takes and abuse.....
Over forty pages ? Just shows how much free time they must have in the Army these days, what with all those ops they've got on at the moment.

They need to be very careful when casting aspersions over future relevance - there's only so many times you can 'deploy' to Salisbury Plain or BATUS in the absence of anything else to do
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 21:21
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Stamford
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They should have plenty of time for Arrse since they've all gone home to keep warm for Christmas.
Stuff is offline  
Old 8th Dec 2014, 21:25
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: An Ivory Tower
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, nearly 50 pages of discussion after one letter from one serviceman - and reading between the lines in the BBC article it was possibly a note home shared with the BBC by the recipient. I just hope that anyone piling in to the "bunch of whingers" camp has never dripped themselves in a letter or call home.
London Eye is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.