Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Tom Cruise hangs on an A400M

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Tom Cruise hangs on an A400M

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Nov 2014, 13:39
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Great yarmouth, Norfolk UK
Age: 72
Posts: 640
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Looks as if Airbus are going for the recordfor product placement in Hollywood block busters....

Thinks 1:
The last time I remember so ething like this was when they had Concorde dog fighting F4s (using a very pistol to decoy an AIM 7 Sparrow) in one of the Airport films....

Thinks 2:
If I were hanging on the outside of an airctaft at 500 feet, I think my shoes would go from black to brown....
bobward is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 14:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure that the F14, in common with most US Navy jets of that time, delivered permanent 100% oxygen (and maybe they still do?).

Unfortunately 100% oxygen doesn't stop airsickness.
Since the mid '50s all USN ejection seat equipped aircraft did not use console mounted O2 regulators and instead used mask or torso harness mounted mini-regulators which always deliver 100% oxygen.

The MIL-R-81533 mini-regulator built to the CRU-79/P specification was active from the late 1960s thru early 2000s. So that is what would have been mounted in the Topgun Tomcats, as well as the A-4s. And they deliver 100% oxygen.

And yes, 100% oxygen does not prevent motion sickness, as Tom Cruise experienced, as well as any of the numerous civilian folks who have flown with the Blue Angels in their A-4s and F/A-18s. And BTW, Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo all had 100% O2 environments and the majority of astronauts still got sick, just as they did in the Shuttle and Space Station which have a nitrogen/oxygen environment.
KenV is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 19:06
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Old Hampshire
Age: 68
Posts: 631
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
When we were discussing with Airbus whether or not the A400M was going to have air deflectors I did wonder if, with them open, we'd be able to put a deck chair on the jump step, or the patio as I started to call it.
VX275 is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2014, 22:44
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
...funny, 100 per cent oxygen helped this joyrider when he was taken up for a jolly and felt a little queasy.
"Just flick that switch my son, oh, and would you like a fly?
Holy heck - yes thank you sir."
Pending airsickness promptly sorted.
MB339 - April 1995.
OK, not a true heavy iron jet, but still able to pull G's.
tartare is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 01:36
  #25 (permalink)  

Victor B1a
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Fremantle, Western Australia
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up 100% O2

Good for hangovers at dawn.
dmussen is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 12:22
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,235
Received 52 Likes on 21 Posts
Is that door-like item just forward of him what they are using to break up the airflow prior to paradropping?
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 12:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The back of beyond
Posts: 2,133
Received 173 Likes on 89 Posts
That's right Martin.
melmothtw is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 18:24
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...funny, 100 per cent oxygen helped this joyrider when he was taken up for a jolly and felt a little queasy.
"Just flick that switch my son, oh, and would you like a fly?
Holy heck - yes thank you sir."
Pending airsickness promptly sorted.
MB339 - April 1995.
OK, not a true heavy iron jet, but still able to pull G's.
Aaaah, that explains it. Taking the stick often helps vs being a passenger. Works that way in cars too. The driver is much less likely to get car sick than the passengers. With your hands doing the flying, your brain is much better able to sort out the disconnect between what your eyes see and your inner ears sense. It's that disconnect that drives motion sickness.
KenV is offline  
Old 5th Nov 2014, 18:46
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,228
Received 417 Likes on 260 Posts
Originally Posted by dmussen
Good for hangovers at dawn.
Yep.
KenV
Taking the stick often helps vs being a passenger.
With your hands doing the flying, your brain is much better able to sort out the disconnect between what your eyes see and your inner ears sense.
Funny, back when I was teaching basic aerobatics to nuggets, I hated getting on amusement park rides.
Probably psychological.
At least with the nuggets, I could take control when I wanted to!
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 14:03
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Next to Ross and Demelza
Age: 53
Posts: 1,235
Received 52 Likes on 21 Posts
melmothtw:

Ta.
Martin the Martian is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 20:25
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
True Ken.
We'd just pulled 4.5g at the bottom of a loop.
"I can show you 6g if you want," says young Squadron Leader Callum.
"No thank you," says I.
But then two minutes later, happy as Larry, was flying the same loop again myself, same pullout (not quite as tidy, mind) feeling just fine.
Amazing experience - and have been utterly hooked on fast jets ever since.
tartare is offline  
Old 6th Nov 2014, 21:35
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Deepest darkest London
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably the most exciting thing that's happened in Stamford for a while.....

Its a nice place honest

V1
Valiantone is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2014, 07:12
  #33 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,447
Received 1,603 Likes on 735 Posts
And BTW, Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo all had 100% O2 environments
After the Apollo 1 ground fire in which the crew dies, Apollo was redesigned to use a 34% oxygen mix, use in all later craft, including the Shuttle, since.
ORAC is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2014, 16:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
After the Apolloa 1 groundf fire in which the crew dies, Apollo was redesigned to use a 34% oxygen mix, use in all later craft, including the Shuttle, since.
Apollo only used a two-gas mix on the pad and during launch, and only in the capsule. The astronaut's suits were still pressurized with pure O2, which is what the crew breathed. During the launch the capsule was vented and then repressurized with pure O2. Once in orbit both the Apollo capsule and LM used a pure O2 environment. But the pressure was low (around 4.5 PSI) so the partial pressure of O2 in flight was essentially the same as the partial pressure of O2 in Earth's atmosphere. It's the partial pressure of O2 that determines the flammability. Flammability becomes a problem at partial pressures of around 5 PSI and above.

The two-gas mix was used only on the pad and during the launch (basically only when in the earth's atmosphere) because the capsule's structure could not handle a negative pressure differential, so it always needed to be pressurized at least the same as the outside pressure. With a pure O2 environment, the result was a partial pressure of oxygen on the pad of around 15 PSI. VERY dangerous, as Apollo 1 showed. Once in space, the capsule was pressurized to around 4.5 PSI and they could safely use pure O2.
KenV is offline  
Old 7th Nov 2014, 17:50
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,555
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
ORAC

Apollo was redesigned to use a 34% oxygen mix.
Nope.

After "The Fire" Apollo procedures were changed so that an oxygen/nitrogen mix was used in the cabin, but only prior to launch, in flight it quickly transitioned back to 100% oxygen at I think 5 p.s.i. (In old money).

Edit to add that I see Ken beat me to it.....but I'll add AFAIK I'm not sure anyone really thought oxygen at 5 psi was ever safe but it was a trade off between the fire risk vs. perceived complications of a two gas environmental control system. There was also the need to run suits at low pressures (for mobility purposes) and so given there was supposedly a race on in the 60's and there was no time for a complete redesign it was decided to retain a pure oxygen environment in flight. These days they use a nitrogen/ oxygen mix for cabins and "space walkers" have to pre-breathe pure oxygen in their suits prior to reducing pressures for space walks.

Last edited by wiggy; 7th Nov 2014 at 19:13.
wiggy is offline  
Old 9th Nov 2014, 20:13
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom Cruise films Mission: Impossible 5 over Wittering - Rutland and Stamford Mercury
Al R is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.