Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Eurofighter, deburred holes (insufficiently)

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Eurofighter, deburred holes (insufficiently)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Oct 2014, 14:42
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Jetex Jim: I find it quite offensive to be accused of such bias. I just try to stay objective and away from the Airbus-bashing crowd (which seems to be quite strong among the lower and middle ranks of the military, the German ones for sure). That does not mean that I have any affiliation with the company, nor that I approve of everything they make or do - I most certainly do not.

However, as I've read, the problem seems, in essence, to be one of temporary restrictions. Eurofighter have implemented some sort of a gradual guaranteed service life, if I'm getting it right. That means that, although the airframe itself is allegedly designed to last up to 12.000hrs+, they gradually extend this "warranty" first to 1500, then to 3000, then to 6000hrs. The current decision just temporarily delays the extension of this "warranty".

I guess this has to do with modern fighter aircraft having some sort of dynamic fatigue management, concentrating on the actual wear and tear of the aircraft rather than fixed flight hour limitations. I'm not an engineer, so I have some trouble understanding all the details in German, let alone explaining them in English.

While we're at it: does anyone have some information about the average airframe hours of the RAF Typhoon force? The reason for this question being that some people involved with German Eurofighters speculated that you guys might be more affected by this current restriction than we are.

At the end of the day, our most heavily used airframe just recently reached 1000hrs, making the current crisis a rather theoretical one. But since the RAF has used their Typhoons operationally, some of us thought that they may have a bigger issue with that.
exhorder is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.