Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Russiia new Helicopter Carrier the Vladivostok

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Russiia new Helicopter Carrier the Vladivostok

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Mar 2014, 09:46
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In 2001 we had a comparatively good developing Amphibious capability. Ocean, Bulwark and Albion inbound plus the excellent 4 X Bay Class all inbound (eventually).
Mind you it did cross my mind what a little Britain still wants toys like these for. Small wars against Pygmies armed with straw.
Anyway, 13 years later militarily we are in a fine state and that group mentioned has done its bit and effectively been downsized quite a lot.
Now its Russia's turn.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 11:37
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well amphib multi-capacity is far more likely to be used in the next 40 year than WW Bang class carriers TBH
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 8th Mar 2014, 14:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Here
Posts: 1,709
Received 38 Likes on 23 Posts
Originally Posted by ORAC
Just conjecture, but reading up on the original design from which the Mistral was developed there was a problem with turbulence over the deck around the superstructure which would affect helicopter operations. They had a lot of wind tunnel tests and altered the design.

Is it a possibility that the flat prow acts the same way the blunt nose is used on air vehicles to lift the airflow above and away from the deck?

Sister's view was that was a possibility whilst underway or facing a headwind (helos not needing the 'wind over the deck' that fixed wing aircraft do), although wouldn't be much use in a crosswind. She also postulated that it was to allow a free field of fire from the forward armament.
Davef68 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.