Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

What's the future of the Red Arrows?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

What's the future of the Red Arrows?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Feb 2014, 09:13
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only threat to the Arrows is financial, given the ageing T1 airframes. I am not qualified to assess how serious that threat is.
IMHO the current cost, about £9 million per annum, is worth every penny - and more.

In the meantime:
The Red Arrows will put the tragedies behind them and carry on with the job they do so well.
They will continue to be one of the world’s premier aerobatic teams.
They will continue to enthral crowds all over the world with their magnificent displays.
They will continue to be excellent ambassadors for this country.

Arrows bashers, axe-grinders and tall poppy syndrome sufferers will continue to revel in the criticisms of the team and make tabloid-style comments on PPRuNe, dismissing contrary opinions as a failure to understand.

I read literally hundreds of accident reports during my career as an aviation specialist and still read many out of interest. Having read this report very carefully, I sincerely hope the SI process itself will be reviewed.
Those parts of the report which deal with the seat issue are significantly more impressive than the sections which deal with 'other factors' which did not cause the accident and are not alleged to have contributed to it.
In particular, but not exhaustively, the suggested falsification of records needs to be looked at very carefully to determine if that suggestion is actually justified by the evidence.


FL
Flying Lawyer is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 09:41
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
dervish


Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 325
If Scotland gets its independence this problem wont worry you anymore and you can then ban them from Scottish skies.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 09:51
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Ban who? The MoD? The Red Arrows? The people who caused all this carry on in the first place (which was the subject of my post)? The first two, no. The last, yes.

Good to know you're more interested in the independence debate than aircraft safety.
dervish is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 12:53
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: avro country
Age: 72
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely the future of the Reds will be unmanned, and controlled from a portaloo at Scampton.
Linedog is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 14:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9 million is a bargain if it be true.

Price of a couple of ordinary Premiership football players, in Britain in the 21st Century.
I don't believe that figure - Scampton alone must cost an awful lot of money to maintain as a base.


This morning - with hundreds of acres of farmland flooded, urgent rebuilding work on railway lines, fire and police stations closing nationally.... put your hand on your heart and look in the mirror - do we need to spend hard earned UK resident taxpayers money on a flying display team?


Needs to be put to the public.
Or get get it privatised. Everything else is.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:06
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Far North of Watford
Age: 82
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't believe that figure - Scampton alone must cost an awful lot of money to maintain as a base.
The Station acts as parent organisation to 3 resident units, namely the Royal Air Force Aerobatic Team (RAFAT), No 1 Air Control Centre (1ACC) and the Mobile Meteorological Unit (MMU). As independent units each have a specific mission to fulfill, which when taken together result in the delivery of a significant defence diplomacy and operational output for this station.
Genstabler is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:12
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I am intrigued to know what the Reds will fly next. I'm guessing we don't have the spare T2 airframes?
There must be some serious proposals out there. Any ideas?


Posted from Pprune.org App for Android
Tashengurt is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:23
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lincs, UK
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...There must be some serious proposals out there...

That's a bit optimistic. Do you really think that anyone in the MoD with both cash and influence is seriously looking at this problem?
ProSentia is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:28
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dundee,Scotland
Age: 39
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why can't they go down the RAF falcons route and be used as part of fast jet training requirements?

Last edited by Eul0gy; 9th Feb 2014 at 15:41.
Eul0gy is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Put the Blades back in uniform as reservists and contract them to do the flying? They're all ex RAFAT anyway and put up a pretty damn good display, doesn't have to be FJ although I can see the point that they fly Walter's which aren't British.

I thought Big Dave has already said that the RAFAT were staying anyway? Mind you, probably more worrying than him saying nothing at all.
thing is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:48
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: North Pole
Posts: 970
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I just love this thread! In the last few years we have given up so much capability ie Nimrod, Jaguar and Harrier! Now we are arguing about keeping the Reds! Fast jet pilots must be at a premium these days and should only be deployed on the frontline.

In my book there is no argument that can justify a nine man team in this day and age! Tough I know,but fact!
newt is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:54
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dundee,Scotland
Age: 39
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly newt so paint some hawks mrk 2 red and have it as final trainung before ocu or go down the reservist route as stated above
Eul0gy is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 15:54
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the BofB flight, would you disband that as well?
thing is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 16:12
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: England
Posts: 1,930
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
In my book there is no argument that can justify a nine man team in this day and age! Tough I know,but fact!
Really? That's "fact" is it?? With counties like Switzerland, Indonesia; Saudi; Italy France able to maintain a display team, you think the UK should be relegated to a 3rd rate Air Force??
Roland Pulfrew is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 16:16
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With counties like Switzerland, Indonesia; Saudi; Italy France
and Yorkshire.

Joking aside, I was having the same thought but you beat me to it.
thing is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 16:26
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
RP

I thought here on pprune we had already collectively decided that the UK now has a "3rd rate Air Force".


http://www.pprune.org/military-aircr...orce-when.html
Biggus is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 18:33
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,738
Received 77 Likes on 39 Posts
Originally Posted by Hangarshuffle
Or get get it privatised. Everything else is.






GeeRam is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 18:42
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Are there 22 airworthy Hunters - well I only asked......................
Wander00 is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 18:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the Hunters privatised?

Who owns them? Seriously, I don't know.
Look, I know people hate us refusniks on this issue, but could not the money saved from the RA be better used purely for defence......by the RAF?
The RN had to give up the Field Gun (this was using up too many skilled people to justify), Royal Tournament (same), the bloody Display Team (same), the whining Sharks (Gazelles).
The country is totally bankrupt, people are simply in denial about it.
If we are going to take peoples hard, hard earned then spend it really wisely.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2014, 19:36
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 23, Railway Cuttings, East Cheam
Age: 68
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are there 22 airworthy Hunters - well I only asked......................
Well there are about 10 in a hangar a Scampton, there's at least one at North Weald and I think the rest are at Exeter. So could be done I reckon. Assuming you mean The Loop.
thing is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.