Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

FJ use of Transponder Mode C

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

FJ use of Transponder Mode C

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Jan 2014, 08:27
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,565
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 30 Posts
My memory is vague on this one, but bear with me... in the Sentry about 10 years or so ago we had a spate of F3s reporting their Mode C at minus 1,400 feet. (similar to the Dublin story above?). This figure relates to receiving a Mode C response with just the bracket pulses but no height information contained within. The problem to the E-3 was that priority for height display on console was for the Mode C height and therefore we could not get a radar height response on these targets. Requests for information about these responses from the F3 PT was not forthcoming, but we believed that they resulted from Mode C being selected to standby rather than off in the cockpit(??).


Needless to say, the Sentry software was modified to disregard such low MC responses as it would be unlikely for the aircraft to be operating at such a low level (and wanting to be seen on Mode C) so we got radar reported height back onto the displays.
Wensleydale is online now  
Old 1st Jan 2014, 08:33
  #22 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not presuming anything, jto but fwiw it happened a lot so I don't believe it was finger trouble. And why would I rephrase the post to ask about primary radar when the issue is transponder use?
ShotOne is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2014, 10:06
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Somewhere in England!
Age: 67
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not sure of the position of the radar heads in the airspace you are talking about but I know in some areas primary and secondary radar heads were not co-located so the issue might have been to do with radar cover. Additionally, most of the ATC SSR radar heads were gated, can't remember the figure but I think it was about 7000ft/min (up or down), and if the value was exceeded the mode C was not shown on the screen.

PM
Pie Man is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2014, 19:37
  #24 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That might be part of it, pm. The radar heads, not the 7000 fpm that is, unless they were having a particularly exciting day out! I was intrigued by OAP's comment which perhaps hints the transponder was considered to be helping an opponent??
ShotOne is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2014, 20:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well, it would be a shame to miss the chance of a few Fox2's/3's. We were bombers for Gawds sake !

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.