Aircrew Sustainability
and doubtless would seriously hack-off those poor souls waiting years to start flying training.
If we are having to try and get rid of 400 aircrew annotated ground posts (probably many with some form of SQEP requirement) then one might argue that we are already below critical mass and its no longer that the bracnh is on the verge of implosion but has already started imploding - it may now just be a matter of how quickly the implosion accelerates.
Quite so. On my first tour, I averaged 297 hours per annum (24.7 per month).
A couple of days ago I learned that a Luftwaffe Tornado wing is giving its pilots 41 hours......per year....
Is it any better in the RAF?
A couple of days ago I learned that a Luftwaffe Tornado wing is giving its pilots 41 hours......per year....
Is it any better in the RAF?
The biggest problem in retaining aircrew is that following the draconian cuts in the military there is no realistic prospects of a career in the military as clearly it is a shrinking industry.
shortly Tristar and Merlin
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: East Midlands
Age: 84
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have been retired for ever, it seems! I got 440 hours in 50 minute sorties at 4FTS in 1965 and I got at least 35 hours a month working a 3 day week on a UAS in the 90s but not every month.