Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Terrorist and enemy military threat from microdrones and UAV.

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Terrorist and enemy military threat from microdrones and UAV.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Oct 2013, 11:13
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Terrorist and enemy military threat from microdrones and UAV.

Good afternoon. I'm not sure if this thread has been done before, please feel free Mods to delete or move.
A while ago I was in the grounds of a private stately home. Catching my eye a smart car emerged, a table set up and I believe one of these was launched and flown. microdrones UAV - platform for aerial inspections, aerial video, aerial photography,

A very small,discrete remote controlled aircraft is how I would describe it. All in all it was up and about flying for perhaps 1 hour, landed then packed away and gone. I am guessing taking pictures of the big house and grounds. Or maybe just a jolly. I have to admit that although I have seen UAVs abroad, I had never seen one of this particular type before, and how actually good it was at what it did.

My guess is that these craft will become more and more available, and probably cheaper and mass produced.

I think it inevitable, seeing as we use them now for military use, that some people will eventually use them actually in Great Britain against ourselves, in a variety of ways.
My questions.
1. Is the threat from these craft acknowledged?
2. Is the threat taken seriously?
3. Could we counter the threat?
4. Is the RAF responsible for policing the skies against them? Or the local police?
5. is it practical for the RAF, now to form into defence units against them?
6. Am I over-reacting?

Fancy a debate?

I personally think that one day somebody will try and use these craft against us and ours. You are all intelligent people, put my mind at ease.Can we stop them?
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 11:47
  #2 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I can imagine that people in the Herefordshire area have and are looking into the use of micro-UAVs for recce, surveillance and munitions delivery. It's a damn sight easier and more accurate than a close target recce by night, though an alert sentry may well be able to spot such a device fairly easily.

If we are using them then we must expect them to be used against us.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 11:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can buy your own for £350 or build one to your own spec.

DJI PHANTOM QUADCOPTER in Stock with GPS Ready to Fly RTF by DJI Innovations - Quadcopters Uk official DJI Dealers for the Uk


Multi Rotor UK - Index

Last edited by defizr; 28th Oct 2013 at 11:57.
defizr is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 11:59
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This one's even got Tom Cruise providing the backing music

defizr is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 12:35
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don't worry ... effective countermeasure technology is available



Hat, coat ... door
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 12:36
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Am I correct then in thinking anyone can simply buy and fly one of these machines as they wish?
Are you required to register them with say, CAA?
I mean do the UK authorities do that? Keep a track?

The stately home I mention above is regularly overflown at fairly low level by UK Mil and Civilian aircraft (on approach to their respective aerodromes and bases).
The UAV was up to a height of (I'm estimating) 300 feet.


Granted we are not Israel, but their methods pretty straightforward (and perhaps practiced) in dealing with them.(Video shows an F16 (I think) shooting one down with an AAM a year or two ago).

I wonder if we could realistically do this today in the UK, but I doubt if it is ever really been actually practiced by the RAF. I think perhaps it should be, and I stand to be corrected?
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 12:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne
Age: 54
Posts: 1,511
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Small ROVs are already extensively used in several industries, notably broadcasting and film making as a cheap means of getting overhead shots. You'll occasionally see the shadow of one crop up in programmes like Top Gear for example.
I've no idea what their payload is and I'm not about to Google it but I'd imagine if they were going to be used to carry explosives it'd need to be done by someone with access to proper stuff rather than some radicalised buffoon with a pile of hairdressing products and fertilizer?
Tashengurt is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 13:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of the Animal Lib orgs used one of these but unfortunately flew it over private property in the US during a shoot with predictable results.
500N is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 14:07
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The payload must be several kilo then if they carry cameras used in industry. When they use it they will probably obtain a small amount of plastic explosive, a small live camera for relay via net streaming, mobile phone and detonator or such. A flying IED. Terrorist emphasis will be upon surprise, accuracy and proximity to a target upon detonation and a defenders initial inability to counter.
It will come. In fact it has probably already been used somewhere.
I've no doubt our counter-lot have already thought this all through (a la Olympics and the air defence installations).
Is it a police job to defend against though, or RAF? I'm just interested, and I'm sort of surprised the RAF in an age of constant cutbacks, don't try and plug themselves a bit more here (turf protection for jobs and careers etc).
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 14:09
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: UK East Anglia
Age: 66
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ANO

check out the ANO here.

http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP393.pdf

Even get kids helicopters with video recorder for less than £60.
dragartist is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 14:17
  #11 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: England
Posts: 924
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These things are amazing - I actually thought they were thousands of pounds to buy.
I'm going to get one - for purely peaceful purposes if your reading this, spooks.
Hangarshuffle is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 14:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"and I'm sort of surprised the RAF in an age of constant cutbacks, don't try and plug themselves a bit more here (turf protection for jobs and careers etc)."

New stream available for RAF Regiment Recruits

"Shotgun shooting specialist"
500N is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 14:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Under a recently defunct flight path.
Age: 77
Posts: 1,375
Received 21 Likes on 13 Posts
That six-rotor job with gimbal-mounted camera is impressive. Wonder what the control handset/transmitter range is and whether or not line-of-sight is required?
Lyneham Lad is online now  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 14:59
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,150
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
Waterborne threat

Wasn't there a similar topic to this on here, a few years back but as a part of a UAV debate? Or was it on E-Goat or ARRSE, where someone pointed out with a quote on 'further down the food chain' stuff gets passed down. The nightmarish scenario of a container ship / pleasure boat / sailing up the Thames (or any other waterway for that matter) and the bad guys letting loose a fair amount of MAVs with IED.
chopper2004 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 15:11
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chopper

Are you saying the bad guys use MAV's with IED's to sink the ships ?

Why not just use another high speed boat and ram it ? A lot easier and far more controllable both in terms of accuracy and detonation / effect.
500N is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 15:36
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: The Alps
Posts: 3,150
Received 101 Likes on 54 Posts
The author of that topic / thread stated he thought that the ships used as a launch platform against cities and towns akin to a poor man's Tomahawk. As in couple of dozen of hundred or so MAVs / RC a/c lifting off and causing havoc and damage to people and property.

Speedboats can be sunk by GPMG or cannon fire from a helo, if caught as seen during Operation Prime Chance / Praying Mantis by certain units in North Carolina and Kentucky and by the Flying Leathernecks finest.

Cheers
chopper2004 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 16:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They use 2.4GHz spread spectrum. On a good day the range can be up to a mile or a little more.
defizr is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 16:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You can get what they call 'first person view' where the camera on the quad transmits pictures back to a screen in your transmitter or goggles.

defizr is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 17:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Fear not; the town of Deer Trail CO USA are considering issuing gun licences to shoot down any government drones which fly over the town - (25$ ea for $100 bounty per kill).
This begs the question of how to distinguish government drones from the others.
Deer Trail, Co., sees applications for nonexistent drone-hunting license.
PEI_3721 is online now  
Old 28th Oct 2013, 17:55
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: England
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bit of a monster

defizr is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.