Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Secrecy...outdated concept?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Secrecy...outdated concept?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Oct 2013, 15:42
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: East sussex
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me slip this teaser in........ Tell me all about Roswell and in later years Rendlesham forest/Colonel Charles Holt? Happy for any info. I thank you.

Daz

Last edited by dazdaz1; 20th Oct 2013 at 15:49.
dazdaz1 is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2013, 15:54
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: South East of Penge
Age: 74
Posts: 1,792
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
BTW it's the Official Secrets Acts that we are all subject to ( whether we have "signed" them or not. )



Pedant exits left, pursued by a bear.
Haraka is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2013, 16:46
  #23 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Haraka, quite, which is why I have my original signed copy but neglected to sign any further copies on retiring. Having returned the pensions paperwork but not the OSA paper no one said a thing.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 20th Oct 2013, 17:12
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mold
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Secrecy...outdated concept?
Hmmmm I could tell you but then I'd have to............. you know the rest.
xenolith is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2013, 07:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I once inadvertantly took away from work a Face to Face book (if you need to ask, etc..) which wasn't even classified Restricted. Yet before going on my Jungle Warfare Instructors Course, I was sent a document describing Brunei in terms which could have been lifted from a Thomas Cook travel guide.. which was. You have to ask where the consistency is.
Al R is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2013, 08:00
  #26 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Back in the '60s BMC discovered that the RAF had breached copyright on the Mini's workshop manual. They had taken the BMC product and turned it in to an AP marking it Restricted in the process.

What did the RAF do? They threatened BMC with a breach of the OSA!
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2013, 08:33
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: 59°09N 002°38W (IATA: SOY, ICAO: EGER)
Age: 80
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The American method of classifying each and every paragraph made life simpler, if a TS document had just 2 or 3 paragraphs marked TS and the rest were Unclassified then just removing the 2 or 3 TS paragraphs made the document Unclassified.
ricardian is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2013, 09:40
  #28 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Ricardian, while the US system (also applies to NATO) has some benefits and it was applied in UK for a while, it has disadvantages too. First, it highlights to someone without the need-to-know what is most sensitive, and secondly it relies upon the originator to identify accurately if a part of the whole can be safely accorded a lower classification.

I recall once being 'told' the content of a Secret caveated letter from a 2*. Later the letter was reassessed, and the inclusion of just one word meant the letter was upgraded as a whole to TS. As TS I was not only allowed to read it but was responsible for filing it too.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2013, 12:38
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: raf
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know what is the official criteria for deciding what classification to place a document in?
For example, what would make a document top secret rather than secret?

Last edited by gr4techie; 21st Oct 2013 at 12:42.
gr4techie is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2013, 16:07
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Often in Jersey, but mainly in the past.
Age: 79
Posts: 7,812
Received 137 Likes on 64 Posts
Originally Posted by Pontius Navigator
gr4, ah, but we know they know, but do they know we know they know?
A bit like ESM parameters. They know what their parameters are but do they know we know?
That's exactly the fog one hopes still gets generated. During an 'interesting' posting I was connected with <redacted> and the one thing that made it so <classification> was that we didn't want "Them" to know what we knew, and how we knew it, if indeed we did (or didn't, or couldn't on Thursdays).

In consequence, even the <codeword> had a codeword, and the name of, or codeword for, <redacted> was never used either in writing or in conversation, and even my desk diary was a registered <classification> document.

So, when I first heard <it> mentioned in the Media, I nearly sh*t myself!!

Capabilities (and deficiencies) are as precious for National security as hardware details and/or Op plans.

[/pompous old bloke]
MPN11 is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2013, 16:47
  #31 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
MPN, a bit like the group captain being filmed for a Panorama programme briefing a crew for a mission - like he did that every time. We NEVER mentioned what he said and the operation itself was usually programmed with a nickname.
Pontius Navigator is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.