Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Skylon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th July 2013 | 19:57
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Wiltshire
Some interesting input here chaps. Maybe, at the moment there is little or no direct military use for this beastie, however, that's not to say there never will be. Also spinoffs from development, could well find their way into future Mil. Projects. Did Concorde not benefit from reheat, surely a product of military research ? I also like the statement that basically, if no one gives it a go, no one will and we may miss a new phase of development. It all looks a bit Fireball XL5 to me, but then, as Danny42C says, "you'd never get me up in one of them things".


OK Venus ? OK Steve.

Smudge
smujsmith is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2013 | 20:01
  #22 (permalink)  

"Mildly" Eccentric Stardriver
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 4,330
Likes: 485
From: England
light things orbit slower than heavy things.....not!
er...mass?
Herod is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2013 | 20:16
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 2
From: East Sussex UK
Smudge ...

This is more like it



Best ...

Coff.

Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 15th July 2013 at 20:25.
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2013 | 20:19
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 3
From: UK
Herrod mate, read the blurb, they say "lighter". Still wrong with Mass anyway.

OAP
Onceapilot is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2013 | 20:30
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Originally Posted by t43562
SpaceX etc have done well but they haven't actually delivered reusability yet. In any case the RE claim, accept it or not, is that the market can't grow without cheaper access to space and that providing that access will fuel the demand.
The problem is that you end up spending billions of pounds up front to develop something whose projected cost to orbit, if it works, is about the same as a reusable SpaceX Falcon.

In the long term, to reduce cost much further than that requires a single stage to orbit launcher rather than a multi-stage launcher with reusable stages. But there's no sane business case to get from here to there, while SpaceX can be making money as an expendable launcher while they build up to reusability.
MG23 is offline  
Reply
Old 15th July 2013 | 23:16
  #26 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Aviation Qualifications: LAME
Posts: 36,137
Likes: 5,738
From: Falling off the end of the thread
Oddly enough, I looked at it and instantly thought Fireball XL5, but one didnt want to show ones age

The name strikes up a similarity too... Still a damn good Battlestar should see them off......... by your Command


Last edited by NutLoose; 15th July 2013 at 23:18.
NutLoose is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2013 | 06:00
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 2
From: East Sussex UK
Nutty then it would be a cylon
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2013 | 08:14
  #28 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 644
Likes: 6
From: Old Hampshire
Incidently, Alan Bond the chap behind HOTOL and Skylon has admitted in the past that he was inspired by the XL5.
Come on Alan, you know no one is going to biuld you a very long runway when we all know Gerry Anderson was right with the railway launch solution nad XL5 is a better name than Skyon.
OK maybe the 'kicker' at the end of the XL5 launch rail isn't exactly practical but it will allow the craft's undercarriage to be a lot lighter (landing mass only to support).
VX275 is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2013 | 08:39
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Wiltshire
Coff, #23

You're right, that's a mean looking ship, with Blue Steel too. Thanks for that.

Nutloose,

Age is of no consequence when you've watched the original series

Smudge

Last edited by smujsmith; 16th July 2013 at 08:42.
smujsmith is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2013 | 20:51
  #30 (permalink)  
Sir George Cayley
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Calling Capt Steve Zodiac, Capt Zodiac your new Fire Balls are ready!

SGC

Space Patrol was better btw.
 
Reply
Old 16th July 2013 | 21:07
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
From: UK
Isn't it a pathetic, tragic indictment on our self-destructive mentality that when such a potentially world-changing BRITISH invention is showcased all we can do is descend into sub-moronic comparisons with a puerile 40 year old children's cartoon TV show?

F*** me. No wonder this country is going to the dogs.
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Reply
Old 16th July 2013 | 21:08
  #32 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Wiltshire
Sir George,

Captain Larry Dart, Slim and Husky were indeed "proper" heroes of the puppet diaspora. I'm torn between the two. I do say that Stingray and Thunderbirds was not my thing. Good point well made Sir.

Smudge

Mushroom;

As for moronic puppet series. Is it a crime to enjoy a memory or two these days ? Perhaps I should queue up for my Liverpool Care Pathway now, before its cancelled. Get a life mate !

Last edited by smujsmith; 16th July 2013 at 22:51.
smujsmith is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2013 | 08:13
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,992
Likes: 2
From: East Sussex UK
Button old chap ... we're just having a bit of fun

Anyway ... you can't tell me that Scottish Aviation didn't get a bit of inspiration for the Bulldog T1, or Hunting with the JP, from uncle Jerry



Coff.
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Reply
Old 17th July 2013 | 18:50
  #34 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Wiltshire
Blimey Coff,

I knew a QFI at Cranwell who was the double of your pilot in the picture. Obviously, a self portrait.

Smudge
smujsmith is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2013 | 13:51
  #35 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 668
Likes: 127
From: London
Audio clip

The audio clip from Alan Bond is the interesting item in this page:

BBC News - UK government excited by 'disruptive' Sabre engine


The bit that was new to me was their intention to bring the manufacturing of their heat exchangers entirely in-house and use that as an opportunity to work out how to reduce the cost by a factor of about 10. It is of interest because it might enable the idea to be applied to all sorts of areas outside space including ordinary jet engines.
t43562 is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2013 | 15:34
  #36 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,394
Likes: 856
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
The Skylon project is so typically British - a brilliant piece of engineering and an idea that might never see the light of day. But at least it now has some funding.

Let's hope that it will succeed!

Coming from an era when Muffin the Mule was still legal, I personally consider those awful kids' puppet science fiction shows rather poor.

Whereas 'UFO' with ladies such as Wanda Ventham and Gabrielle Drake.....

Last edited by BEagle; 18th July 2013 at 15:40.
BEagle is online now  
Reply
Old 18th July 2013 | 16:13
  #37 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Wiltshire
Beags,

I've heard of Muffin the mule, and I understand it was very popular in your youth, its nice that in our more enlightened times people can feel free to out their little foibles

Re reading the Reaction Engines Limited web site blurb on the SKYLON, it does mention a payload bay mounted "Personnel and Cargo Compartment", at a stretch I could see a capability for very rapid deployment of say, an SAS team to a distant area in a hostage situation. Although I suspect we would need some seriously good economic news to justify it. Mind you, by the time it's developed the SAS will probably all fit in it. It's hard to see any real military options without knowing its true capabilities, but as a few have said maybe the engine technology could be adapted to military use.

Smudge
smujsmith is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2013 | 16:43
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis, IN, USA
Having heard all the same promises about paradigm shifting technology 30 years ago...and 20 years ago...and 10 years ago it sounds like an albino pachyderm to me, albeit a hypersonic one.
turboshaft is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2013 | 16:54
  #39 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 194
Likes: 46
From: Squalor
I really fancy that Lady Penelope.

Is this normal or am I in a splinter group?

wets
Wetstart Dryrun is offline  
Reply
Old 18th July 2013 | 17:40
  #40 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Wiltshire
I hope we are not creeping in to impropriety here, the mods will surely decide, and I accept my part in it, but giving ex , or existing, servicemen an outlet for their " deviances"? Would surely constitute a breach of the code of reasonable conduct, which is a credit to these forums.

My original post regarding Skylon was well and truly covered in a few, well thought out posts. I, like many, will wonder if, despite the latest inject of taxpayers money, this project will realise any major benefit to our country. Lets face it, we sold the jet engine for peanuts to our cousins over the water. I really hope this goes well, for no other reason than it would encourage British engineers to develop a new branch of aircraft propulsion. It's right as a country to invest in our scientific and industrial base, my concern would be funding a British invention for a "Foreign" advantage.

"Muffin the Mule" may turn out to be a very relevant phrase if we fail to back our own technology and "allies" take advantage of our weakness.

Smudge

Wets,

I suspect you have just opened a whole new "branch" of thinking.

Last edited by smujsmith; 18th July 2013 at 17:42.
smujsmith is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.