Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Are we crackers to be anxious over hackers?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Are we crackers to be anxious over hackers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th May 2013, 16:06
  #21 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
clicker, as far as I know, first use was in 1965 with the introduction of the WE177 series. I suspect some idiot having produced an OR for an unbreakable key then for got to patent it.

I saw the key advertised in Motor Sport as an ignition-key after market option around 1966 and on gaming machines not long after.

All our keys were in unique pairs and serial numbered. We discovered that two keys, with different serial numbers, both operated the same lock. So much for the chances of two identical sets in 1:10.000,000. Then again we may have got a match between one of the first 10 Mill and the next batch
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 16:54
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bristol
Age: 56
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Going back to the original question, then yes I think we should be very anxious about hacking, and not just Internet hacking.

Since the '60s the Western world has become more and more reliant on many forms of communication, and disrupting these would cause chaos to everyday life. Many of you will know which disruptions would lead to deaths and hardship very quickly, so I don't think its wise for me to elaborate further on a public forum.
barnstormer1968 is offline  
Old 13th May 2013, 17:35
  #23 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Hacking eh? I agree with Barnstormer... And so do the US Government.. BBC News - Huawei and ZTE pose security threat, warns US panel

They've vetoed Huawei takover of an number of us infrastructure/technology providers.
Closer to home a number of the UK operators have a vendor split whereby they use Huawei plus an-other depending where you are making your voice or data connection, you may well be on infrastructure that has concerns.
AR1 is offline  
Old 14th May 2013, 16:41
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 82
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't necessarily need to be connected to the Internet to be compromised.
We had a bit of a scare in the late 60's when it was discovered that those dastardly Russkies were parking up plain vans outside Foreign Embassies. The vans contained very sensitive electronic listening devices which were able to pick up electromagnetic fields & radio frequency emissions from electric typewriters.
At the time, I was responsible for maintaining two Scientific computers, one at the Home Office & one at HM Treasury, so the rush was on to cover the electronic components with a mylar barrier (like a Faraday cage), which did nothing to help the cooling!!!
Damn! Is that a black van coming up the driveway?
VIProds is offline  
Old 14th May 2013, 17:16
  #25 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Remember the intranet separation of internet is not necessarily absolute. There may be a wall between systems used by users by the bearers may well be common within the national and international infrastructures. The weakness may well be outside the military and within companies such as BT.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 14th May 2013, 18:09
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by PN
All our keys were in unique pairs and serial numbered
Sorry. If they were unique, there couldn't be a pair. Really sorry. I don't know why I did that.

Last edited by Courtney Mil; 14th May 2013 at 18:10.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 14th May 2013, 19:10
  #27 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
CM, oh dear. You are right that a one-off key is unique. Equally one key of a pair is not unique but a set, comprising one or more items may be unique.

In this case it was SEF Keys.

Equally, as we had two pairs those two pairs were not unique.

My A- and see you.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 14th May 2013, 20:10
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London
Age: 66
Posts: 345
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only secure network is one that has no connection to the outside world and hopefully severe searching and checking to make sure no muppet brings in a USB stick or worse. If the prison serveice can do it surley the MOD etc can do it.
Dysonsphere is offline  
Old 14th May 2013, 21:17
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
PN,

It just happened. I couldn't help it. I knew I was on thin ice when I wrote it, but, worse, I had to edit to correct two, even worse grammatical errors.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 14th May 2013, 21:21
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Dyson,

That was the solution I was suggesting earlier. It seems everyone that wants a global connection sees (or is talked into believing) the standard industry solution as the secure system the salesmen tell them it is.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 07:06
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I say bring back invisible ink, digestible paper and carrier pigeons
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 11:14
  #32 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
The only secure network is one that has no connection to the outside world
And isn't compromised from the inside by design.
AR1 is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 11:34
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Wilts
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dont ever think that this is one way traffic. Industrial espionage, ethical and unethical hacking is possibly something the west is equally as good at. Say no more
Bladdered is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 12:38
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and hopefully severe searching and checking to make sure no muppet brings in a USB stick or worse.
Once worked for a big Swedish multinational who also built ship borne missile systems. They gave us laptops with tracking and encrypted hard drives that were set to wipe clean on 3 wrong passwords. Policy was no USB sticks. Everyone used them including the manager who was espousing the no USB policy. Strangely, laptops regularly went missing too. Once when burning the midnight oil at 2 a.m. and all alone on one of the rarefied levels of a 42 story "smart" building, I heard someone trying to bash down the door, fortunately I was on the phone to a co-worker and kept the line open. The perpetrator got through the street level door (RFID card), manned security in the foyer, lift operation (same RFID card but has to be programmed for that floor) but didn't succeed getting through the last line of defense which was just a swipe card controlled door, so he/she tried to force it but didn't succeed. Had to be an inside job.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 14:03
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: London
Posts: 555
Received 21 Likes on 15 Posts
The whole issue of computer security is an area where the most obscene risks are taken in some areas whilst apparently strict security is applied in others. Systems are exceptionally complex and have many many holes.

As someone pointed out you need many layers of security - not merely at the perimeter and you have to design your system with the assumption that people will and even have already found ways in.

I think that the worst mistake of most computer systems is to centralise information such that there is someone, somewhere in the organisation (e.g. in the server room) who effectively has access to all of it. I'm not greatly experienced in how to achieve this so it's just my gut feeling: no person should be able to know it all.

The only other plan I can think of is to spend a great deal of effort in generating false information so that anybody who steals it has to doubt any individual piece.
t43562 is offline  
Old 15th May 2013, 18:06
  #36 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by t43562
I think that the worst mistake of most computer systems is to centralise information such that there is someone, somewhere in the organisation (e.g. in the server room) who effectively has access to all of it.
Quite. I had a tour around a very modern commercial computer facility in India. All the workers had zoned access passes so that one group, working for say GAP, could not access material form another such as Levi. We could pass through as our Admin escort had an all zones pass though he had no computer expertise (therefore safe).

We then went to the server room and I asked about backups as we were just introducing a new backup regime and I had instituted different levels - daily in different room, weekly in different building etc.

The IT man proudly showed me their backup tapes on a curtained shelf under the servers.

When we left their Admin wallah said "That was wrong, wasn't it?"

Computers would be fine without people.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2013, 18:34
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 1 Dunghill Mansions, Putney
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Israel suspects China in failed cyberattack vs. defense industry
The attempted attack took place several weeks ago in the form of an email sent to scores of industry executives and program officials from an unnamed German company “known to Israeli industry,” said Nir Dvori, senior defense reporter at Israel's Channel 2 News.

In his Oct. 27 report, Dvori said, “defensive measures” managed to detect and “close down” the threat before recipients had an opportunity to open the mail and release a Trojan horse embedded within the seemingly innocent correspondence.

“Defensive measures discovered the attack and thwarted it. The assessment here is that the attack came from the Chinese defense industry,” Channel 2 reported.
The Chengdu J-10 team must have mislaid their Lavi blueprints.

I/C
Ian Corrigible is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2013, 19:15
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,072
Received 2,940 Likes on 1,252 Posts
I say bring back invisible ink, digestible paper and carrier pigeons
One of the simplest forms of invisible ink on a PC is after your message write another message then change the text colour to that of the page, viola invisible ink and the message can be read by changing it back at the other end

Other simple one is hiding text in images

How to hide text inside an image - Trick

QuickCrypto - Steganography Software - Conceal Information in Folders, Images, Sounds


By the way, speaking of Keys, the Austin A40 ones could open the door of the Vulcans

Last edited by NutLoose; 29th Oct 2013 at 19:17.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2013, 06:36
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
I read a Lt Colonel has been put in charge of MoD's new "cyber warfare" department. Anyone who has seen the way Lt Colonels are routinely dismissed in MoD HQ as unnecessary annoyances will sympathize with the guy.
dervish is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2013, 07:10
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
By the way, speaking of Keys, the Austin A40 ones could open the door of the Vulcans
As a kid I was part of a group that visited RAF Wyton, included was a look round a Canberra. On arriving at the jet out on the line the chappie in charge realised he'd forgotten the key; luckily a 2p coin was just as effective at gaining entry.
Willard Whyte is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.