First photo of Indian Air Force C-17A
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: zoo
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Where did the Maharaja's get their wealth from ? From Indians ?
They still had the wealth when the British left.
Admit it - before the west arrived.................... India was a land of ragged starving beggars overseen by a regime of money grabbing avaricious feudal elites.
The Indian economy comprised a quarter of the world economic output at the time when the British came. In plain words, Indian economy was then what the US economy is today.
Economy of India under the British Raj - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
""An estimate by Cambridge University historian Angus Maddison reveals that India's share of the world income fell from 22.6% in 1700, comparable to Europe's share of 23.3%, to a low of 3.8% in 1952""
Its a wonder there was never a revolution in pre-British India, along the lines of France - but then I guess the population was so poorly fed they didn't have the strength to get out of bed, let alone fight
Those millions living literally the scraps from the waste bin, so despised that if one of you high caste prima donnas as much as stepped in the shadow of one (let alone touched one) you had to go off for god knows how many days of ritual purification
America as a Religious Refuge: The Seventeenth Century, Part 1 - Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions - Library of Congress
millions living literally the scraps from the waste bin
The reason why untouchability and caste-ism are now defunct is because the constituent assembly that drafted The Constitution of India after independence declared it illegal. In sharp contrast to the British rule, 50% of government jobs and places in colleges were reserved for people affected by caste-ism. And who were the members of this constituent assembly? Overwhelmingly upper caste people!!!
_________________________________________________________
Industrial Revolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
""The Industrial Revolution was a period from 1750 to 1850 where changes in agriculture, manufacturing, mining, transportation, and technology had a profound effect on the social, economic and cultural conditions of the times. It began in Great Britain, then subsequently spread throughout Western Europe, North America, Japan, and eventually the rest of the world.""
The Industrial Revolution that made Britain what it was until the World Wars co-incided with the establishment of their rule in India giving credence to the claim that the revolution was funded with Indian resources. On top of that, local Indian industry was discouraged to give support to imports from Britain.
__________________________________________________________
Well, when I read comments by pious naive fools who attempt to retcon history into a story in which the western imperial powers are responsible for all the third worlds self inflicted overpopulation ills, I get so annoyed that I want to vomit words.
__________________________________________________________
The question is not whether if, and how much, of the loses due to the British loot got compensated by the benefits perceived by some Britishers. The question is whether it is ethical to siphon off money from the people of another country by interfering in their internal affairs? Is it ethical for one country to force upon other nations, the supposed "benefits" perceived by the invading country?
Tabs please !
""An estimate by Cambridge University historian Angus Maddison reveals that India's share of the world income fell from 22.6% in 1700, comparable to Europe's share of 23.3%, to a low of 3.8% in 1952""
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: zoo
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To me that says that the rest of the world became more prosperous between 1700 and 1952.