Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Puma Upgrade Delay

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Puma Upgrade Delay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Jan 2013, 17:12
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
They'll have to. It would cost too much to change the cover of the F700.
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2013, 18:13
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
No reason why they should. We had instructors at Oakington on Meteor T7s who had flown them as Meteor F4s.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2013, 19:20
  #43 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,574
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
They'll have to. It would cost too much to change the cover of the F700.
Yes, I'm sure this was probably not included in the budget...
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2013, 23:07
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Can anyone say for certain if the HC2 airframes will retain their original military registration numbers when they go back into service?
Not "certain" certain, but there's strong circumstantial evidence that they will.

This photo shows the first HC2 to be handed over, carrying "F-ZWDD" test marks as well as its original HC1 "XW216" serial.



I can't see the aircraft being re-serialed again at this stage.

Last edited by BossEyed; 4th Jan 2013 at 23:09.
BossEyed is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2013, 21:18
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 463
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
All Chinooks retained their original reg during the Mid Life Update (MLU)in the 90's, I'm sure the Puma will retain their's during their ELU!
chinook240 is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2013, 23:33
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Anglia
Posts: 2,076
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
The only reason for the French registration is to allow civil pilots to complete flight checks after the mods have been embodied. (I have changed Dutch Mil Registrations for UK Flight testing for the same reason)

It is illegal to fly civil pilots on (foreign) military registered aircraft. So technically, someone in MOD knows all about this and someone at ECUK probably coordinates the required changes.
Rigga is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2013, 00:02
  #47 (permalink)  
MOA
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Here and there
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rigga - it is not illegal for foreign civilians to fly 'our' military equipment. The pilots just have to be approved by the MAA (this activity for test and evaluation used to be carried out by D Flying/Flight Test Div which is now subsumed into the faceless animal that is the MAA).

This aircraft is F-regd as the military EC(Fr) activities at Marignanne is regulated by the French mil regulator and requires all aircraft to have a F-reg. The first 2 aircraft as I recall we be constructed and tested at EC(Fr) with the rest at EC(Ro). EC(UK) will put the UK 'eyes only' equipment on board and test and provide RTS recs.

For EC(Fr) activities, the UK serials should be 'clearly obscured' as they eloquently put in their regulations however this does not appear to be the case here - ho hum.

When the aircraft are at EC(UK) they will be operated under the UK mil reg as this activity now comes under the auspices of the MAA.

Clear as mud eh?
MOA is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2013, 09:43
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although this photo was obviously taken in the UK so the French registration should have been removed, unless it was on the delivery flight from France perhaps.
Lynxman is offline  
Old 6th Jan 2013, 10:21
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Judging by the number of XW 216s spread around the aircraft it looks like they are all being dismantled and are making sure they connect the rights bits for each aircraft.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2013, 16:32
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: God's own county
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know the latest about this project? I have had a good trawl online but it seems to have gone very quiet! Are the trials for release to service complete? Anyone know if they have received the cabs on the fwd fleet?
Alexander.Yakovlev is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2013, 17:59
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The OCF followed by front line crews are due to start flying at Benson in July.
Door Slider is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2013, 18:36
  #52 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
And this was the aircraft that Swiss Des would have scrapped?
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 11:31
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
A noticeable lack of presence at the Queen's birthday fly past A noticeable absence from the Leuchers Air Day. What's happened? Fitting Makilas to Puma is nothing new and fitting glass cockpits and various other bits is not rocket science. Not only that Odious could not be bothered to send a Chinook up there either
Should tens of thousands of people make an effort to go to Leuchers to see the Royal Air Force then the Royal Air Force can make an effort too.

Last edited by Fareastdriver; 8th Sep 2013 at 13:41.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 11:41
  #54 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I live almost next door to the secret Oxonian rotary base and I have not seen a Puma in ages. What are all the squadron guys/gals doing all day?
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 12:12
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 833
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A noticeable lack of absence
Does that mean they were there?

P1
pohm1 is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 13:41
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Edited Damned wireless keyboards,
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 15:40
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It has nothing to do with the RAF sending Pumas/Chinooks to the Leuchars Air Show, the decision rests with JHC.

Airborne Artist, there have been Pumas flying in and out of Benson almost daily for at least the last month and on at least a weekly basis for the past few months.

The RWOETU have been flying since last year and the first bunch of QHI/QHCIs have recently qualified.
Door Slider is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 18:36
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 322
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not only that Odious could not be bothered to send a Chinook up there either
The phrase "operational not decorational" could not be more apt; I can assure you that the SH force has been very busy as of late and whilst you may not have seen them at Leuchars this weekend the people of Salisbury Plain would have been well and truly sick of the sound of Chinooks and Merlins last weekend and a number of people from both forces were also enjoying the delights of the Plain on the bank holiday. They've also been supporting exercises overseas (and flying the weekends when our FJ brethren refused to)!

The downside of being able to land on a football pitch is that we get called on to support a large number of smaller airshows, village fetes etc around the south of the UK where the rotary wing presence is felt more and they quite simply cant get bigger aircraft on the ground. It's good for the locals and the image of the RAF but is a drain on crews (more so engineers).

Yes, well and truly a bite but just because you don't see aircraft at Leuchars dont rudely assume that it was because they "could not be bothered" to send aircraft up.

Last edited by Aynayda Pizaqvick; 8th Sep 2013 at 18:38.
Aynayda Pizaqvick is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 19:21
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
It's wasn't rude, or an assumption. They couldn't be bothered.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 8th Sep 2013, 19:33
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Odiham
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry Ignorance of the highest order

Sorry Fareast driver, but I am going to bite.

The Chinook is currently going through an update of the aircraft whilst maintaining operational capability - what other force does that? And I am not talking about a pod here or there - an entire new cockpit with a complete overhaul of the SOPs.

So I apologise if a Chinook could not be "bothered" to turn up to the Leuchars air day. 10 are on ops in Herrick and the rest of the fleet are on Salisbury plain practicing for said op. Where was the Typhoon for Odiham Families day? Or are they that busy? Probably not.

If there is one force that is bothered, it is the Chinook force. I still cannot believe why you would make such a comment apart from wanting to make me bite - which you have succeeded very well.

Now go away from my screen little man.....
wokawoka is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.