Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

VC10 to retire on 28th August????

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

VC10 to retire on 28th August????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Aug 2012, 19:46
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Ahh thought the cmk1 was doing its last operational flights.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 20:36
  #62 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Leicestershire, England
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just for the record the aircraft in the flyby were, XV108 and XR808, both C.1Ks and ZA147, a K.3

-RP
Rhino power is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 21:07
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,932
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
I see the K4 didn't make it, will have to try again next week!

Last edited by N707ZS; 28th Aug 2012 at 21:07.
N707ZS is online now  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 23:18
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Lincs
Posts: 2,307
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flypast at RAF Leuchars.

TEEEJ is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 20:23
  #65 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm amazed at XV108 and XR808 lasting so long. They were 5 years old when I first worked on them and I was demobbed 35 years ago. 40 years is a lot more than the builders expected them to last. Hell, that's twice as long as ANYBODY expected them to last! I've never enjoyed working on anything so much since then, as the Vickers Knickers.
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 22:47
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The C1k is still in service: one of them is on a trail in a few weeks time.
lj101 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2012, 23:45
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,071
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
Name another airliner that hasn't lost one in a crash...... Says everything
NutLoose is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 01:54
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Canada
Posts: 359
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
As a Nimrod FE who has only been a pax on these ac (albeit on the flt deck on most occassions), I extend my best wishes (and gratitude) to all who flew them; always sad to see the old girls go.
Avtur is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 07:27
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Top floor, b@stards moved me. NO LONGER watchin the circuit
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Memories

Memory 1. Bruggen to Deci via Glasgow (I think) and Brize (nightstop) to visit friends mid 90's (route got a bit messy at the last minute - just had to go with it!). We were the only PAX Scotland to Brize leg, crew strapped both young sons into swing seat for the whole leg and went down the west coast in brilliant conditions talking to them the whole way.... my sons loved it !

Memory 2. Trailing F3OEU jets back from Tonapah, fantastic crew with an exceptional flight steward !! He got brilliant provisions and really looked after us ! Cruelly cut short when one of the F3s diverted into Bagottville in Canada with Low Oil P and us sooties were kicked off to wait for the sweep aircraft with the spare engine. Descended into farce and I eventually came over on an over crowded Herc with 2 very pissed off F3 crew !!

Memory 3. Several trips on the flight deck whilst down the Falklands ... a mate was the pilot when I was on 1435 .... exciting flying for a big jet !!

The VC10 is a great aircraft which in my opinion should have been a world beater .... more history.. I must be getting old !
Hammer Head Too is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 07:31
  #70 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm amazed at XV108 and XR808 lasting so long.
They just don't build them like they used to. Both aircraft mentioned have survived many, many of my landings
Exascot is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 08:08
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Home
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
NutLoose

Not quite, BOAC sold one to Nigeria Airways G-ARVA. Flown by expat crew BOAC/EAA/BUA, CFIT on approch to Lagos with all killed.
Altimeter miss read by 10000ft was most probable cause.

Last edited by cessnapete; 1st Sep 2012 at 11:20.
cessnapete is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 12:55
  #72 (permalink)  
Cunning Artificer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The spiritual home of DeHavilland
Age: 76
Posts: 3,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
808 was one of the first batch and 108 was in the final batch in '66
Blacksheep is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 18:18
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Parts Unknown
Posts: 249
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
I am not sure if this has been mentioned before - apologies if it has.

When Concorde was retired, it set a benchmark (as remarked by Jeremy Clarkson(!) amongst others) - it was the first time in history aviation had gone 'backwards' - there was no longer a supersonic airliner.

What many do not know is that the VC10 was the fastest airliner in the world before concorde arrived, and STILL the fastest when she left.

That is some achievement.

And once again, upon the demise of the Vickers beauty, history will repeat itself.

Sad, sad times. Wish there was something to shout about in the RAF. Well, there is, but it's all bad.
Baldeep Inminj is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 19:44
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Age: 79
Posts: 547
Received 45 Likes on 17 Posts
VC10 cruise speed

Not really sure that's true. In BOAC/BA we cruised them at .84 Mach, indicated, which was .825 true whereas the 747-400 was cruised at .86. I guess there is little or no difference between indicated and true Mach numbers with modern ADCs. I understand the 380 is cruised at .85. Still slower than a Victor !!

As for the Nigeria crash, was heard that a gun had been found in the cockpit wreckage raising suspicions of a possible hijack.

Sadly, East African lost a Super at Addis caused by a nosewheel tyre failure which led to a rejected take off at way above V1.

That said, an extremely fine aircraft with an incredible safety record. Proud and delighed to have flown her.

Last edited by RetiredBA/BY; 1st Sep 2012 at 19:52.
RetiredBA/BY is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 19:54
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: oxford
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old thread on it here with info ref max speed (including Beags)

VC10 Mach .94 [Archive] - PPRuNe Forums


The frames are limited speed wise nowadays due to wing fatigue. They are beautiful aircraft (in my option anyway), and when in formation with the Typhoon, make the prettiest formation.

Last edited by lj101; 1st Sep 2012 at 19:59.
lj101 is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2012, 23:47
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Midlands
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Memory 2. Trailing F3OEU jets back from Tonapah, fantastic crew with an exceptional flight steward !! He got brilliant provisions and really looked after us ! Cruelly cut short when one of the F3s diverted into Bagottville in Canada with Low Oil P and us sooties were kicked off to wait for the sweep aircraft with the spare engine. Descended into farce and I eventually came over on an over crowded Herc with 2 very pissed off F3 crew !!
I feel their pain.. The only time I've ever been 'very pissed off' on the way home from Tonapah was with a boring old Appo too....

...emphasis on "on the way HOME from Tonapah"



Flipflopman
flipflopman RB199 is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2012, 07:21
  #77 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may have posted this story before but relevant here. Running rather late LHR to Andrews AFB with the PM on board as soon as we left the NAT I asked, and was cleared, for direct destination .92 Mach. A voice from the aether said, 'gee what kind of aircraft cruises decimal 92'. My F/O as quick as a flash said, 'a very late VC10 old boy'

The fuel flow was horrendous above .86 which is why we always filled it half way up the windows for these type of trips to make doors time if delayed on departure. Very low ZFW so it was possible and the tax payer was paying

For the record we made it to the second - as usual
Exascot is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2012, 07:40
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,824
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Exascot, no doubt that was in the days of very shiny paint, polished to a high gloss for a VIP trip. No pods or pylons, no camera pod, probe or SDS either.

Which at high IMN would have reduced drag very considerably compared with the somewhat draggier VC10K.

When we first had the VC10K, BWoS recommended a cruise IMN of M0.82, whereas the VC10 C Mk 1 normally cruised at an indicated M0.84. Even then, the K's fuel burn was rather higher.

Exascot, good to see that your high speed cruise received ATC clearance! I recall a snottygram being sent to the station from London ATCC, reminding captains of the requirement to renegotiate clearance for a 5% TAS or 0.01M speed change. It seems that some VIP crews were causing problems in the Londin TMA by making unannounced speed changes to make good their 'doors times'.....
BEagle is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2012, 08:26
  #79 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Botswana & Greece
Age: 68
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exascot, no doubt that was in the days of very shiny paint, polished to a high gloss for a VIP trip.
Absolutly

No pods or pylons, no camera pod, probe or SDS either.
God forbid

VIP crews were causing problems in the London TMA by making unannounced speed changes
I was aware of this and always reminded my chaps to obtain clearance. ATC were usually very accommodating if they could be. Also arrivals into LHR were not often 'doors time critical' it was usually, 'just get me home as soon as possible'. The local controllers were superb always allowing us to take off and land on the southerly runway for the Royal Pavilion regardless of runway usage at the time. Really appreciated guys, thank you.
Exascot is offline  
Old 2nd Sep 2012, 09:25
  #80 (permalink)  

Pilot Officer PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here you go lj101...


VC10 and Typhoon Formation on Flickr

Tonks
Tonkenna is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.