In, Out, In, Out, Shake It All About - MTP PCS
How hard can it be to sort out a standard uniform instruction for your natty combat jim-jams?
This reminds me of the nonsense when the wretched wooly-pully first appeared in about 1973. Was the shirt to be worn with or without tie? Was the stable belt to be worn over or under the pullover?
That stupid, cheap and nasty badge must surely be a pi$$-take?
This reminds me of the nonsense when the wretched wooly-pully first appeared in about 1973. Was the shirt to be worn with or without tie? Was the stable belt to be worn over or under the pullover?
That stupid, cheap and nasty badge must surely be a pi$$-take?
Last edited by BEagle; 24th Jul 2012 at 21:05.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MG
In the 1920s, when we were having fun 'Air Policing', there was a toned-down two-tone brown and sand version of officers' rank. It seems that we've missed a trick by not looking at history agin.
That bloody awful "logo" says it all really.
Have a care; why risk creating a tradition when you can seize the opportunity of creating a fashion.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Going deeper underground
Age: 55
Posts: 332
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My understanding is that the RAF logo badge is just for the Olympics to identify RAF personnel to Joe Public. If 'corporate identity' is so important, they should be wearing blues.
I am also led to believe the that TRF is to be replaced by (wait for it!) a roundel! 10 out of 10 for a waste of effort and money The TRF works just fine now that we have been wearing them for the best part of a decade.
(Source - A4 mate at Halton)
I am completely dumb-founded by the decision to wear PCS in a manner which is neither in concert with the other two Services nor with the designers' intent. Utterly pointless, especially when the advice from the Project Team and the intial guidance from the RAF was 'the lightweight jacket is designed to be worn outside the waistband of the trousers'. Again, a pointless waste of staff effort. The only sensible decision is the wearing of blue rank slides in camp.
What is even more pointless is the lack of rigour with which any of this will be applied. Northwood is a fancy dress party at the moment; even the Army cannot agree how to wear the new CU and they have had very clear direction from CGS.
I am also led to believe the that TRF is to be replaced by (wait for it!) a roundel! 10 out of 10 for a waste of effort and money The TRF works just fine now that we have been wearing them for the best part of a decade.
(Source - A4 mate at Halton)
I am completely dumb-founded by the decision to wear PCS in a manner which is neither in concert with the other two Services nor with the designers' intent. Utterly pointless, especially when the advice from the Project Team and the intial guidance from the RAF was 'the lightweight jacket is designed to be worn outside the waistband of the trousers'. Again, a pointless waste of staff effort. The only sensible decision is the wearing of blue rank slides in camp.
What is even more pointless is the lack of rigour with which any of this will be applied. Northwood is a fancy dress party at the moment; even the Army cannot agree how to wear the new CU and they have had very clear direction from CGS.
Last edited by orgASMic; 25th Jul 2012 at 08:46.
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Army territory
Age: 58
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only just issued my new spangly 'toned down' rank slide prior to my all inclusive MOD holiday. On my recent IPDT I was asked by one of the boys if I was in the Navy!!!
At least I wasn't mistaken for a brown job.
At least I wasn't mistaken for a brown job.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 868
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's really not difficult.
All participants of the RAF not on VSF duties at the Olympics ARE TO wear No2 HD except for ceremonial duties where No1 HD with medals is to be worn. So says the admin order (that includes travelling)
Makes sense really, searching vehicles and patrolling in blues is not really practical.
Makes sense really, searching vehicles and patrolling in blues is not really practical.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 272
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it's a great way of identifying the service as they never wear their hats today anyway
Just remind me how many times did the RAF Kinloss CO have to tell the Pongo's that were starting to arrive over the past few months to put their hats on? Oh yes, LOTS!!
[Edited to add]
Also reminding them of the need to salute his car when it went by whilst it was flying his pennant - oh that caused lots of confusion for the poor lads, who were then often seen saluting his car when it was parked up outside his office
Last edited by MFC_Fly; 25th Jul 2012 at 14:54.
(Source - A4 mate at Halton
I believe the roundel is for PCS "blues" about to be trialled by Supply and Movements Trg Wg (SMTW - or A4 at RAF Halton). There is no other A4 at RAF Halton as the rest are Serco! The blue PCS is supposed to be similar to that worn by the D-Boats (DARING, DIAMOND, DUNCAN, etc...) who wear the Ship's crest on their right arm - I would expect this is what the roundel will replace?
LJ
I note that the RN are "tucking in" then...
...also the 2011 DIB states quite clearly
That's that then, no more bollox about "it wasn't designed to be tucked in" - get it tucked in you scruffy herberts. Next you'll be wanting to grow mullets and beards to look like the SF
The B Word
...also the 2011 DIB states quite clearly
Lightweight Jacket. A shirt that can be worn over a thermal or sweat-wicking layer. It can be worn either tucked in to trousers or loose depending on environmental conditions
The B Word
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Leon Jabachjabicz. I was about to say; "please let this not to have taken over from AWD when I thought; Google. I wish I hadn't as it gets bloody worse:
No wonder that Subbie looks like she's just had her iPod stolen.
Seriously; I hope that those involved have given sufficient consideration to fire retardancy, colour fastness and dimensional stability. In the '90s we had problems contracting for soft furnishing fabrics for Aunty Betty's war canoes. We thought we would ask the, then, Defence Clothing and Textile Agency for help. The closest experience they had was furnishing underground accommodation and proved a complete waste of effort.
No wonder that Subbie looks like she's just had her iPod stolen.
Seriously; I hope that those involved have given sufficient consideration to fire retardancy, colour fastness and dimensional stability. In the '90s we had problems contracting for soft furnishing fabrics for Aunty Betty's war canoes. We thought we would ask the, then, Defence Clothing and Textile Agency for help. The closest experience they had was furnishing underground accommodation and proved a complete waste of effort.
Last edited by GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU; 26th Jul 2012 at 00:51.
I'm wearing Dark Blue MTP now - it's much, much better than 4s, especially in hot weather. DARING's **** badges need to go - we have a dark blue version of the ship's crest and it makes a coherent statement about who we are. In effect everyone is wearing their cap tally, all of the time.
Tucking it in is uncomfy and pointless, if only because there is a huge wodge of velcro where most people's waist is. Remove that and then you wouldn't get the ridge formed midriff which just looks horrendous. I've also cut all the velcro out of my sleeves to make the sleeves roll up properly.
Tucking it in is uncomfy and pointless, if only because there is a huge wodge of velcro where most people's waist is. Remove that and then you wouldn't get the ridge formed midriff which just looks horrendous. I've also cut all the velcro out of my sleeves to make the sleeves roll up properly.
Not to be a party pooper GBZ, but the fire standards for underground facilties are very, very close to SOLAS regulations; indeed for those who served at Rudloe Manor (yes, THAT site) and other, ahem, underground facilites would remember that much of the fire safety equipment (and the 'civilian' fire officers) were drawn from the Navy. Indeed, one site I helped to clsoe down in the late 1990s still had 'Admiralty Instruction on the Event of a Fire' posters lining the companionways.
But I agree. Baseball caps should be consigned to the sartorial dustbin of history. The TRF (spookily similar to the Gds Div patch) has sort of grown on me over the years. Roundels look a little silly on uniform - some of you will recall that they were worn on hi-viz tunics issued to the Special Safety Teams in c1995 and they looked rubbish then.
But I agree. Baseball caps should be consigned to the sartorial dustbin of history. The TRF (spookily similar to the Gds Div patch) has sort of grown on me over the years. Roundels look a little silly on uniform - some of you will recall that they were worn on hi-viz tunics issued to the Special Safety Teams in c1995 and they looked rubbish then.
Yep, cannot wait for the roundel.
Someone is having a laugh at our expense.
Artists impression of the roundel design on MTP - sorry I only had my ribcage, paintball gun and several minutes of bruising to achieve the effect
Someone is having a laugh at our expense.
Artists impression of the roundel design on MTP - sorry I only had my ribcage, paintball gun and several minutes of bruising to achieve the effect
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Going deeper underground
Age: 55
Posts: 332
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LJ, thanks for the input re the roundel. My contact (A4 as in the staff branch ie Air Cmd at Halton) seemed to think it would replace the TRF in toto, but we shall see.
The blue PCS might work out ok for lineys, workshops and such but it will be far more expensive than coveralls. The PCS instruction specifically says that CU should not be worn in place of coveralls for dirty work which can only be due to the expense of replacement (and lead time during rollout).
The blue PCS might work out ok for lineys, workshops and such but it will be far more expensive than coveralls. The PCS instruction specifically says that CU should not be worn in place of coveralls for dirty work which can only be due to the expense of replacement (and lead time during rollout).
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have just checked AP 1358, following the link from the RAF homepage on DII, and it appears that it is back to Amendment 14, which says that the PCS lightwieght jacket is designed to be worn outside of the waistband of the trousers. Does this mean that their Airships have withdrawn the riduculous tuck it in rule or more likely, our information management is so bad that we can't even get the correct edition of APs on our main website
Bear
Bear