Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Pilot - Physical Requirements?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Pilot - Physical Requirements?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jul 2012, 22:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So... The consensus seems to be that, apart from one aberration, the physical requirement for fast jet is a small penis. That truckies can't see their's no matter how big it might be and Loadmasters have extremely long and powerful appendages...

It seems that "fast jet" syndrome can be "fixed" by wearing a big watch. Can you imagine how freaking awesome you'd be if you were a Loadmaster wearing a big watch....

It'll never happen I'm afraid... Evolution stepped in and you young types just don't have, or need, the colossal appendages that Loadmasters required so the RAF, in it's wisdom, disbanded the trade. Now they have some amorphous blob trade with merely average penii...

[Awaiting the spelling police on that last word]
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2012, 23:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Disagree.

Small penis = won't stick out past the g-suit/bunny suit/immersion suit/etc for an in-flight pee.
Large penis = same problem, won't bend enough to get past 3 zips.

So, fast jets = stunningly average penis.

The really big dicks were only sent to aircraft that didn't require g-suits,which was choppers (ha!), but not SAR (frequent immersion suit wearers)

The really small dicks had to go to aircraft with toilets, which was shiny 10's.




Dr Austin Powers promoting his "Re-role to Fast Jet" device to VC10 co-pilots.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2012, 23:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Foxy.... Baby...

Small penis = won't stick out past the g-suit/bunny suit/immersion suit/etc for an in-flight pee.
Large penis = same problem, won't bend enough to get past 3 zips.
Real men pee in their immersion suit.... Us "chopper" chaps wore them more often than you think - lots of transits over to the (in)continent. A quick rinse with a couple of bottles of Grolsch and they smelled good again...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2012, 23:24
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Real men have such a huge bladder that they never need to pee.

Longest trip 11:15

Mind you, when God was handing out body parts, I ended up in the bladder, liver and balls queues twice, and seemed to have missed the brains, nerves and neck retraction muscles departments entirely.

I sold my soul to win my first solo ACT 5-0, and it was worth it.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2012, 23:46
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"RAF Pilot - Physical Requirements?
This is my first post here, I appologise if it is in the wrong topic.
I have been reading up about RAF Pilotting jobs for some time now, I have read that the type of aircraft that successful applicants will be trained to fly is dependant on many factors including physical dimensions?
Does anyone know what physical dimensions would categorise a person for which type of aircraft?
I.E for multi engined how tall/wide or type of build?

Im hoping to apply as soon as my college course is complete, just waiting on lecturers to mark the bleading work!!"

With the greatest respect, I believe academic ability and performance has something to do with selection. Being able to correctly spell your desired career would be a strong start along with basic grammar and punctuation.

I may strike you as unnecessarily pedantic, but contrary to the general trend in public, how you present yourself is actually important.
dermedicus is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 00:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warning:

Utter pedant alert...

Humour failure...

Panic, panic, panic...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 00:55
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AA
My prediction was correct although I was surprised it took
2 pages for it to occur.

The regular SP's must be on holidays
500N is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 01:04
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
500:

You were correct but, like you, it seemed to take forever before there was a real condemnation of the poor lad... CM excepted... of course...

I'm sure the others will pile on soon and inform him that they are all perfect physical specimens and flew fat jets despite their inability to see their willys...









No... it isn't a typo ladies...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 02:03
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,668
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
AA, don`t the `fat` jet guys have `vanity` mirrors above the windscreen,so they can see their `appendages`...(C-17 and Voyager crews)?
sycamore is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 02:17
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 32,975
Received 2,882 Likes on 1,231 Posts
I always thought they just wanted people keen to be fast jet... The rest were just the dross that couldn't.





Standby for incoming from those that bite

Last edited by NutLoose; 20th Jul 2012 at 02:47.
NutLoose is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 02:28
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,817
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
I always thought they wanted people keen to be fast jet... The rest were just the dross that couldn't.
Cruel.....but fair!


The standard equation is Σ (CQ + WS + PS) = Constant

Where CQ = Quality of car, WS = Size of watch and PS = Size of one's gentleman's parts.

Thus if one drives a Porsche and wears a Rolex, one is likely to be poorly endowed.

Whereas if one drives a Peugeot diesel, wears a Swatch........ (Although clearly this only works for blokes, as some might confirm )

Oh and before you ask, an AMG and a Breitling......
BEagle is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 05:13
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"I always thought they just wanted people keen to be fast jet... The rest were just the dross that couldn't."

So the recommendation for the OP when he dresses and drives to the interview is
to drive some swanky, fast sports car, wear a big expensive watch so that at least they think he wants to fly fast jets ?

.

Last edited by 500N; 20th Jul 2012 at 05:14.
500N is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 05:43
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Overlooking the beach, NZ
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We had a wee lass on our course who was too light for the hawk ejection seat limits. So after many many beers the night before we feed her up on a full lard breaky and made her drink pints and pints of water before her official weigh in and measurement... she ended up:
a) about half a kg over the limit and
b) flying multis
bakseetblatherer is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 07:50
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy RAF pilot requirements

Don't know the RAF's physical dimension criteria for pilots. Do know they at least like their pilots to be able to spell! Only one 'p' in apologise, only one 't' in piloting, and no 'a' in bleeding!
peter allison is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 08:19
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Does anyone know what physical dimensions would categorise a person for which type of aircraft?
Ejection seats have certain parameters, back length, leg length to the knee and from the knee to the bottom of your feet. If excessive will prevent correct operation and may even prevent you operating handles. If you are two short, there are issues with what is known as functional reach. i.e, you are strapped to the seat and cannot reach normal controls. If you are over 6ft 2 you could have issues but there have been aircrew up to 6ft 4, above that you will have issues and if you are under 5ft 5 you may have issues.

Some years ago I was involved in an anthropometric study at Farnborough, the range of different bodily dimensions that they can fit in is quite considerable however; aircraft are designed around a normal curve. If you have any dimensions outside the normal you may be restricted, too many dimensions outside the box and you will be excluded altogether.
Whopity is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 08:36
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alba
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anthropometric eh, damn, that's went metric as well
Dunky is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 14:27
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: N. Spain
Age: 79
Posts: 1,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know the RAF's physical dimension criteria for pilots. Do know they at least like their pilots to be able to spell! Only one 'p' in apologise, only one 't' in piloting, and no 'a' in bleeding!
Think you should use inverted commas " rather than apostrophes ' in this comment.
Shack37 is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 15:13
  #38 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The standard equation is Σ (CQ + WS + PS) = Constant

Where CQ = Quality of car, WS = Size of watch and PS = Size of one's gentleman's parts.

Thus if one drives a Porsche and wears a Rolex, one is likely to be poorly endowed.
1/P

I prefer CQ+WS=1/Ps
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 15:23
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: gashbag
Age: 52
Posts: 558
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What happened to the requirement to be able to ride a horse?
PURPLE PITOT is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2012, 16:12
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Still there. I think that's why I got in.

Although free stabling for your own horse has been replaced by free hangarage for your own aircraft (really).
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.