Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

What a waste

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd March 2012 | 19:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 126
Likes: 2
From: UK
What a waste

With the stories of not enough indoor space for our larger aircraft to get maintained. I was at a south Wales base today.

Answers if known please.

Why is that massive white complex completly barren. What a waste of a fantastic facility.
Nomorefreetime is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2012 | 21:05
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 232
From: In the State of Denial
It's simple - if we use facilities at bases that have been deemed redundant then that proves the original case to make them redundant was wrong. Instead we soldier on with inadequate resources because no one at the higher levels is willing to admit that a mistake has been made.
Ken Scott is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2012 | 21:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 304
Likes: 1
From: Former Home of the Hercules, Wilts
Or waste even greater sums of money renting space from private companies to service our aircraft in.
WE992 is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2012 | 21:31
  #4 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,722
Likes: 91
From: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Left hand of MoD not knowing what right hand was doing. Wonderful engineering facility built, with enough built in bells and whistles to give spontaneous orgasms to engineers, each of three hangars reconfigurable to take 2 x VC-10 or 12 x Hawks and lots of combinations (Tonkas and Jags and Harriers then) in between. Massive deal with WAG (Welsh Assembly Government) who take on ownership of base for vast amounts (cos they're responsible for reparations - see missing kit thread - lots of glow-in-the-dark stuff buried there!)

Then other bit of MoD "rolls forward" deep servicing to MOBs, which hadn't the facilities or the people to do the job so contractors were brought in. So no work for wonderful engineer-trouser-wetting facility.

No - come to think of it the same bit of MoD. I guess that makes it a case of the left hand not knowing what the left hand is doing.

You couldn't make it up ........
teeteringhead is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2012 | 21:34
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 253
From: London/Oxford/New York
When is the RAF going to learn that fast jet aircrew are good at flying fast jets, and piss poor at absolutely anything else?
pr00ne is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd March 2012 | 21:39
  #6 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
40 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,722
Likes: 91
From: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
pr00ne I would agree with you for once, but I think in this case it was actually engineers who made the decision....

Cr@p decision whoever made it .......
teeteringhead is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd March 2012 | 00:20
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Aviation Qualifications: Military (Retired)
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 1,523
From: Near the coast
If only the RAF had enough Fast Jets to allow the pilots to keep flying then maybe there'd be less of a problem!!
BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Reply
Old 25th March 2012 | 15:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: South Wales
And I have to look at the f*****g thing every day safe in the knowledge that my job may cease to exist around 2015. (Not forgetting the 100's whose jobs have already gone).

John
John M is offline  
Reply
Old 25th March 2012 | 17:41
  #9 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 402
Likes: 33
From: UK
Also something rather large to do with location.

Nobody actually wanted to work there who could not be posted there and the local community didn't have the infrastructure to attract families.

So great facility, built in a place that doesn't attract all the people to make it viable.

There was a plan to use its fully, create the infrastructure, bring in the people, but there was a small matter of the MOD getting the sums rather wrong as to the levels of training required by HMG and it was found to be not economically viable, and so the programme never got started
GrahamO is offline  
Reply
Old 25th March 2012 | 18:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: S England
and the local community didn't have the infrastructure to attract families.
What Cardiff??!!

Nobody actually wanted to work there who could not be posted there
Is that still the case in today's depressed job market?
Chicken Leg is offline  
Reply
Old 25th March 2012 | 18:58
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 691
Likes: 86
From: W. Scotland
IIRC, the civvy in charge of this depressing balls up got a gong a few years ago.
dervish is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.