Fixed Protection Pension
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fixed Protection Pension
A DIN has been published to inform members of the AFPS who are considering applying or who have applied for Fixed Protection that they must inform SPVA in writing of this decision by 31st March 2012.
Now I can see my pension in the near distance but not so close as to be in touch yet, and a fastball demand to fix it now or never when I have no idea what that means is a worry. Is anyone able to put in laymans language the consquence of letting this go by un-noticed?
Intranet guys may find that:
DIN 2012DIN01-080: Pension Tax Relief – Lifetime Allowance – Notification Date to SPVA.
..works. It is applicable to all in the military regardless of colour of uniform.
Now I can see my pension in the near distance but not so close as to be in touch yet, and a fastball demand to fix it now or never when I have no idea what that means is a worry. Is anyone able to put in laymans language the consquence of letting this go by un-noticed?
Intranet guys may find that:
DIN 2012DIN01-080: Pension Tax Relief – Lifetime Allowance – Notification Date to SPVA.
..works. It is applicable to all in the military regardless of colour of uniform.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tiger mate,
If you expect your pension savings to be more than £1.5 millions when you come to take your benefits on or after 6 April this year, you can ring-fence your 'pot' to reduce your taxation liability (from April, the lifetime allowance (LTA) for pensions will be reduced from £1.8 milions to £1.5 millions). The lifetime allowance is the total value of pensions which you can accumulate without incurring additional tax charges. If you are going to exceed this amount, you can however, apply for Fixed Protection (FP), meaning that your LTA would be fixed at £1.8 millions (and not the revised, lower amount).
People who could benefit from applying for FP are those relatively close to retirement, or anyone who believes the HMRC's value of their existing pension provision might exceed £1.5 millions at retirement. In real-life terms, primarily, but not exclusively, this is of interest to people at 2/3* level - especially those who might be about to start a second career in civvy street. Options? Negotiate a second career pay and remuneration package that considers alternatives and isn't so pension based?
You do not need to already have built up pension rights of more than £1.5 millions to apply but you should expect your pension pot contributions to cease if you do elect to apply for FP. The impact of failing to apply for FP? It could cost up to £75,000 in tax-free cash (especially if you have a second, larger Defined Contribution scheme) while a tax charge would also apply on any monies that exceed £1.5 millions.
HM Revenue & Customs: Fixed Protection for Pension Savings
That is all information - as ever, take personal advice that applies to you.
If you expect your pension savings to be more than £1.5 millions when you come to take your benefits on or after 6 April this year, you can ring-fence your 'pot' to reduce your taxation liability (from April, the lifetime allowance (LTA) for pensions will be reduced from £1.8 milions to £1.5 millions). The lifetime allowance is the total value of pensions which you can accumulate without incurring additional tax charges. If you are going to exceed this amount, you can however, apply for Fixed Protection (FP), meaning that your LTA would be fixed at £1.8 millions (and not the revised, lower amount).
People who could benefit from applying for FP are those relatively close to retirement, or anyone who believes the HMRC's value of their existing pension provision might exceed £1.5 millions at retirement. In real-life terms, primarily, but not exclusively, this is of interest to people at 2/3* level - especially those who might be about to start a second career in civvy street. Options? Negotiate a second career pay and remuneration package that considers alternatives and isn't so pension based?
You do not need to already have built up pension rights of more than £1.5 millions to apply but you should expect your pension pot contributions to cease if you do elect to apply for FP. The impact of failing to apply for FP? It could cost up to £75,000 in tax-free cash (especially if you have a second, larger Defined Contribution scheme) while a tax charge would also apply on any monies that exceed £1.5 millions.
HM Revenue & Customs: Fixed Protection for Pension Savings
That is all information - as ever, take personal advice that applies to you.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Al, that clears the waters a llittle.
Not being at *starry* heights I am assuming it to be irrelevent. By "pension savings"; is this the perceived total value assuming longevity of life?
ie I my pension is 35k pa and I live for retirement plus 10 years are my 'pension savings' 350k (35x10) or am I looking in the wrong direction?
I am yet to do the resettlement finance brief which may cover such things, and thus far have lived in blissfull ignorance based upon the fact that a PAS pension is better than Joe Average is ever going to get.
Not being at *starry* heights I am assuming it to be irrelevent. By "pension savings"; is this the perceived total value assuming longevity of life?
ie I my pension is 35k pa and I live for retirement plus 10 years are my 'pension savings' 350k (35x10) or am I looking in the wrong direction?
I am yet to do the resettlement finance brief which may cover such things, and thus far have lived in blissfull ignorance based upon the fact that a PAS pension is better than Joe Average is ever going to get.
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Deepest Lincolnshire
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Al R
Very interesting comments as always Al. However, I'm a bit confused about your statement:
"I hope you've considered using your other half's allowance too, for your retirement income! Capitalising on £9,205 of tax free income from a (usually - without stereotyping!) non working wife is often overlooked."
I was of the opinion that you can no longer transfer a spouse/partner's unused personal allowance to yourself. Or are you just recommending that investments such savings accounts are in your non-working spouse's name to make use of her (or his!) personal allowance?
Cheers, YB.
Very interesting comments as always Al. However, I'm a bit confused about your statement:
"I hope you've considered using your other half's allowance too, for your retirement income! Capitalising on £9,205 of tax free income from a (usually - without stereotyping!) non working wife is often overlooked."
I was of the opinion that you can no longer transfer a spouse/partner's unused personal allowance to yourself. Or are you just recommending that investments such savings accounts are in your non-working spouse's name to make use of her (or his!) personal allowance?
Cheers, YB.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Certainly a non working partner should have savings in her name, and if appropriate, a Form R85 should be signed and given to the bank.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/forms/r85.pdf
A non working partner should consider having their own ISA of course, and personal pension to make best use of up to tax relief. For a non tax paying partner, £2,880 per annum may be contributed into a pension, made up by HMRC to £3,600 gross. A partner who works and makes, say, £10,000 per annum can save (with spousal help possibly) up to £10,000 gross (£8000 net).
One elegant solution would see someone getting max tax relief on the way 'in' to a pension plan and saving enough to be able to draw just under, or as close to the personal tax allowance on the way 'back'. So - as much tax uplift as you can from the state and £9200+ each year (in your partner's name) free of tax coming back at you both the other way.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/forms/r85.pdf
A non working partner should consider having their own ISA of course, and personal pension to make best use of up to tax relief. For a non tax paying partner, £2,880 per annum may be contributed into a pension, made up by HMRC to £3,600 gross. A partner who works and makes, say, £10,000 per annum can save (with spousal help possibly) up to £10,000 gross (£8000 net).
One elegant solution would see someone getting max tax relief on the way 'in' to a pension plan and saving enough to be able to draw just under, or as close to the personal tax allowance on the way 'back'. So - as much tax uplift as you can from the state and £9200+ each year (in your partner's name) free of tax coming back at you both the other way.
The personal allowance increase to £9,205 is a massive leap too.
If so, then I'm not sure exactly how much we will save. I would dearly love to know what this government considers the definition of weathy or rich actually is. Because the middle are yet again going to get hammered if this is the case. Oh to be a tycoon and have to be forced to pay a whole 20% rate of tax.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are more and more higher rate tax payers being created each year - Labour started dropping the threshold to bring more and more people into it. On the plus side, that means more tax relief available to an increasing number of lower earners who want to make use it.
Soon, we'll all be affluent middle/upper class Higher Rate tax payers..
Soon, we'll all be affluent middle/upper class Higher Rate tax payers..
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To calculate the capital value of your pension (in order to compare it to the Life Time Allowance) you multiply the pension by 20 and add the lump sum. Rule of thumb: if your pension is over £60K the LTA ceiling could affect you.
To calculate the capital value of your pension (in order to compare it to the Life Time Allowance) you multiply the pension by 20 and add the lump sum.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its the pension that you will get each year and will be in the tables - also, tried www.mod.abc.co.uk? . Bear in mind that even if you did declare Fixed Protection, you wouldn't be immediately financially advantaged because you wouldn't be paid anymore even if you did cap your AFPS 'pot'. Right now, its not so much of a problem, but once the pay freeze is lifted it'll be too late of course.
Doctors and Consultants are leaving the NHS final salary scheme in noticable numbers - something which has historically been financial planning heresy. If projected high earners/achievers did place the issue of retirement income above anything else, leaving prematurely at an AFPS 'sweet spot' and negotiating a non pensions biased contract with a civilian employer might be a modern possibility.
Doctors and Consultants are leaving the NHS final salary scheme in noticable numbers - something which has historically been financial planning heresy. If projected high earners/achievers did place the issue of retirement income above anything else, leaving prematurely at an AFPS 'sweet spot' and negotiating a non pensions biased contract with a civilian employer might be a modern possibility.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: bath/bristol
Age: 68
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Benefits crystallisation event
I retired in 2009 aged 54 on Afps05 with 36 years service. Currently being paid an EDP. Trying to get my head around LTA which when I retired was not a consideration (at £1.75m) but now with a post retirement SIPP and LTA reduction most definitely is.
My question is whether a benefits crystallisation event took place when EDP started being paid which somehow used up part of the LTA, or is the calculation done afresh at age 65 when mil pension comes into payment and second lump sum received?
Although I might need paid for advice, there might be a general point here the specialists can answer?
My question is whether a benefits crystallisation event took place when EDP started being paid which somehow used up part of the LTA, or is the calculation done afresh at age 65 when mil pension comes into payment and second lump sum received?
Although I might need paid for advice, there might be a general point here the specialists can answer?
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last three '700' refers.
RPSM11104000 - Technical Pages: Lifetime allowance: Valuing benefits on BCEs: contents
Follow the link through to 'Payment of a relevant lump sum (BCE 6)', then: RPSM11104710 'Lump sums covered (a relevant lump sum)'.
The Lib Dems want to reduce the Lifetime Allowance even further to £1,000,000.. at which point Wing Commanders need to be worried. Without restricting it exclusively to those with suitable seniority, but anyone currently at Group Captain level should be taking a view on this, to the extent of considering negotiating a post mil civilian contract without the superficially attractive pension contributions and something else instead.
Even if the Lifetime Allowance wasn't reduced, it's still easy for the government to revalue a public sector pension, as it did a few years back.
RPSM11104000 - Technical Pages: Lifetime allowance: Valuing benefits on BCEs: contents
Follow the link through to 'Payment of a relevant lump sum (BCE 6)', then: RPSM11104710 'Lump sums covered (a relevant lump sum)'.
The Lib Dems want to reduce the Lifetime Allowance even further to £1,000,000.. at which point Wing Commanders need to be worried. Without restricting it exclusively to those with suitable seniority, but anyone currently at Group Captain level should be taking a view on this, to the extent of considering negotiating a post mil civilian contract without the superficially attractive pension contributions and something else instead.
Even if the Lifetime Allowance wasn't reduced, it's still easy for the government to revalue a public sector pension, as it did a few years back.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: bath/bristol
Age: 68
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the reply. I thought I was able to read and understand most financial/taxation stuff, but that quickly lost me. Too many words with I suspect specific meanings I do not know.
A forecast I got before the final letter awarding the EDP says I have used 57% of my (1.75m) LTA. So I guess I have triggered and used it, which is probably good, because I was concerned that I might have to apply 11 years of inflation increases before working out how the second lump sum features in the calculation.
A forecast I got before the final letter awarding the EDP says I have used 57% of my (1.75m) LTA. So I guess I have triggered and used it, which is probably good, because I was concerned that I might have to apply 11 years of inflation increases before working out how the second lump sum features in the calculation.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LTA
The pension is valued against the LTA at the time it is drawn, so CPI increases between the date you left with a preserved pension and the date it comes into payment will be taken into account.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LJ,
It is mind numbing; you mentioned a SIPP. After its third thematic review, the regulator is issuing fresh guidance this week about restrictions on what may and may not be invested in those, and capital adequacy requirements of providers. Plus ca change.
It is mind numbing; you mentioned a SIPP. After its third thematic review, the regulator is issuing fresh guidance this week about restrictions on what may and may not be invested in those, and capital adequacy requirements of providers. Plus ca change.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: bath/bristol
Age: 68
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am sorry if I am being thick, but I am not clear. Which of the four numbers below gets counted in calculating how much of LTA has been used?
1 - annual EDP
2 - first lump sum paid at start of EDP
3 - pension at age 65 (presumably at inflated value?)
4 - second lump sum (presumably at inflated value?)
There must be hundreds in my sort of situation, so I think my question is still generic rather than personal.
1 - annual EDP
2 - first lump sum paid at start of EDP
3 - pension at age 65 (presumably at inflated value?)
4 - second lump sum (presumably at inflated value?)
There must be hundreds in my sort of situation, so I think my question is still generic rather than personal.
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: @exRAF_Al
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
None of those dictate the LTA. The LTA is what it is, the amount of wealth that is attributed or earmarked to you if in an unfunded scheme like AFPS, or however much you have within your SIPP (and that will change daily).
Then (and everyone's will be different), and however you draw that wealth whether EDP, PCLS from your SIPP, annual income etc.. all will be benchmarked against your LTA.
So, none of the 4 in your list get used to determine your LTA. Rather, what your LTA is (voxpop posted a summary of that) determines how much money (from those 4) that you are entitled to, or can draw.
Then (and everyone's will be different), and however you draw that wealth whether EDP, PCLS from your SIPP, annual income etc.. all will be benchmarked against your LTA.
So, none of the 4 in your list get used to determine your LTA. Rather, what your LTA is (voxpop posted a summary of that) determines how much money (from those 4) that you are entitled to, or can draw.
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: bath/bristol
Age: 68
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I appreciate that those 4 number do not determine the LTA, what I was asking was that given those four numbers, as they all form part of the same afps05 package, how much of the LTA would they have used up, say at age 65?
I think from the answers you have both given and what I have read that the answer is:
(20 x [3])+ [4]
ie, 20 times pension at 65 plus lump sum at 65, both at inflated values
or is it more than that?
I think from the answers you have both given and what I have read that the answer is:
(20 x [3])+ [4]
ie, 20 times pension at 65 plus lump sum at 65, both at inflated values
or is it more than that?
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 95
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another Q for Al R
Sorry for thread hijack/drift!
Currently drawing my mil pension: ~£13K jumping to ~£18K (+ 9 years worth of CPI inflation) in a few years when I hit 55 (commuted full amount when I left).
I'm Working for a company that currently provides a final salary pension, also topping up this fs pension with voluntary payments.
From HM R&C do I simply add my (predicted) RAF pension (in say 15 yrs time when I intend retiring) to my expected pension from my current employment, again in 15 years time, to get a final combined annual pension which should, if it doesn't exceed the figures at the link (£62,500 pa if you don't take a lump sum, £46,875 pa if you take the 25 per cent maximum tax free lump sum), and all other things being equal, not exceed the LTA?
Is there a formula for how much a mil pension is worth in terms of LTA, and if applicable does this amount reduce as the mil pension is drawn? Does the lump sum I took when I left the mil have to be factored in?
Finally will the state pension, assuming it isn't means tested by then, affect the LTA too?
I'm rather concerned that at today's rates the total of my two pensions will be very close to the ~47K, admittedly I nice position to be in, particularly if I continue to keep up my current level of voluntary pension contributions, and that a state pension will certainly take me over the threshold.
Currently drawing my mil pension: ~£13K jumping to ~£18K (+ 9 years worth of CPI inflation) in a few years when I hit 55 (commuted full amount when I left).
I'm Working for a company that currently provides a final salary pension, also topping up this fs pension with voluntary payments.
From HM R&C do I simply add my (predicted) RAF pension (in say 15 yrs time when I intend retiring) to my expected pension from my current employment, again in 15 years time, to get a final combined annual pension which should, if it doesn't exceed the figures at the link (£62,500 pa if you don't take a lump sum, £46,875 pa if you take the 25 per cent maximum tax free lump sum), and all other things being equal, not exceed the LTA?
Is there a formula for how much a mil pension is worth in terms of LTA, and if applicable does this amount reduce as the mil pension is drawn? Does the lump sum I took when I left the mil have to be factored in?
Finally will the state pension, assuming it isn't means tested by then, affect the LTA too?
I'm rather concerned that at today's rates the total of my two pensions will be very close to the ~47K, admittedly I nice position to be in, particularly if I continue to keep up my current level of voluntary pension contributions, and that a state pension will certainly take me over the threshold.
Last edited by Willard Whyte; 2nd Mar 2014 at 16:43.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for Willard Whyte
When you took your pension it was 'crystallised' and that is the point at which the test against the LTA is done. If you have any concerns about what I say, speak to Al.