Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

How to fly a Herc!

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

How to fly a Herc!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Jan 2012, 18:40
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Doncaster
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hear's another Fat Albert display from the Blue Angels

zero1 is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2012, 19:30
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
That Blue Angels clip is simply....well, I suppose charitably you could merely say, 'so American'...

What sort of utter wanquerre states "Let's go fly" in response to a call of 'Vmca?

As for that ar$e with his continuous hyped-up commentary.... Do they really need all that intercom yak ("I'm outside") to fly such a very simple display?

In any case, I suspect that most spectators were probably bored fartless after the first minute or so....

"Oo-rah...."
BEagle is online now  
Old 7th Jan 2012, 19:48
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm, in addition....

Chuck seems to be slightly lazy with his feet.

The runway centreline needs repainting - it doesn't appear to be coincident with where Chuck is taking-off or landing.

Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 7th Jan 2012, 20:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
I love air shows, I really do...but why do that with a transport a/c? I saw the twin-engined thingy at RIAT strutting its stuff, amazing, but why? FJ hooning around in burner, old-timer fighters look great in their natural environment....maybe I'm just getting old!
They're all just a warm up act for the Vulcan - or at least any air show where it's appearing
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 04:55
  #25 (permalink)  
A97
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: YSRI
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kreuger flap
I would loved to have known what the "Cautions" we could hear being annunciated were. They were just ignoring them. As for the stall warning on landing at least he didn't get the stick shaker and push.
Based on when they occurred (after bunting) I would say it would have been oil pressure low ACAWS. Flight manual says 7 seconds is the limit of an intentional negative or zero g manoeuvre.
A97 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 08:02
  #26 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 54
Posts: 1,420
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given that most of them didn't occur under sustained (or even any) negative G I'd suggest they weren't. I've certainly never seen a low oil pressure acaws whilst bunting. Could have been anything.

Originally Posted by Kreuger flap
I would loved to have known what the "Cautions" we could hear being annunciated were. They were just ignoring them.
Er, no they weren't. Each one was acknowledged with the co making a "continue" call. I can guarantee that the cautions were for something phenomenally dull though.
StopStart is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 10:26
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
I can guarantee that the cautions were for something phenomenally dull though.
Would 'pie oven over-temp' fall into that category or is that one of the more important cautions?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 12:45
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Beags....when you wuz doing the same in the Beverly....did you not do much the same?
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 14:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
SASless - Don't you mean when he was on the Vickers Valentia?
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 14:35
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Hanging off the end of a thread
Posts: 33,068
Received 2,939 Likes on 1,252 Posts
I bet you both, he found throwing the wheel about like that was punishing on the old Wing warping.......
NutLoose is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 15:15
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
Gee...I wuz trying to be polite and talk of the most modern aircraft he flew....not the one he flew the longest part of his career!
SASless is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 15:52
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK and where I'm sent!
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fat Albert display from the Blue Angels

Well, I have to fly slightly in the face of popular opinion here. Sorry about this, but I thought the crew coordination was pretty bloomin' good. Yes, they spoke American, but after all they are... ...American. I liked the way responsibility for various parameters was passed between pilot and co and the constant monitoring of everything that was going on. Can't argue with what it might have looked like from the ground, but the cockpit was lively place and guys so focussed on what they were doing. It looked mighty professional and I liked it muchly.

On the other hand, I do have to agree 100% with comments about the Vulcan display. Fast jet man all my life, but at airshows she was the only moster that made the earth shake. Utter power!!!

M2

Last edited by Mach Two; 8th Jan 2012 at 17:04. Reason: Removing typos before (rightly) getting strung up for them.
Mach Two is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 16:41
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: England
Posts: 651
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Beagle slagging off Americans (twice) simply because he can? Who'd have thunk it?!

Glad to see that there are at least a couple of fellow Brits who can offer credit where it's due.
Ewan Whosearmy is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 17:32
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
I think I might actually agree with M2 here (just once). An object lesson in crew coordination, as you put it. I've never flown anything with that many people watching me, but I have to say it all looked very slick.

BEags, really sorry here (and I know why you hate it), but I kind of liked the "let's fly". You'd have thrown me out of your jet for that, wouldn't you?
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 17:44
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Actually, just re-watched al the vids on this thread and Mrs C and I are totally in awe of the people that do that stuff in big aircraft. Hats off to the zebras!
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 19:23
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
The thing is Courtney, old horseman, that in an aircraft operating to Scheduled Performance criteria all intercom calls during the take-off roll must be standard and only essential calls should be used...

"Off the peg" is unnecessary - a silent cross check of ASIs reading is all that's required.

"My yoke....your yoke". Well, we'd just call "My controls" and no response was required.

"80 knots" - happy with that.

"Vmca"? Well, I don't know why he would need that. Or why he needed to say something as puerile as "Let's go fly" in response. In the VC10 the next call would be "V1", followed by "Rotate". Then "V2" followed by "Landing gear UP"...."Selected" - and nothing else until flap retract at 1500 ft agl apart from the odd radio call.

I didn't hear many checklist items called during the Blues' C-130 performance - and quite why so many height/speed calls were needed for such a simple display, I really don't know. All we would call would be deviations from pre-briefed criteria.

Standing by for incoming from the usual non-ME aircrew keyboard warriors....
BEagle is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 19:48
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,838
Received 75 Likes on 30 Posts
Well, I have to fly slightly in the face of popular opinion here. Sorry about this, but I thought the crew coordination was pretty bloomin' good. Yes, they spoke American, but after all they are... ...American. I liked the way responsibility for various parameters was passed between pilot and co and the constant monitoring of everything that was going on. Can't argue with what it might have looked like from the ground, but the cockpit was lively place and guys so focussed on what they were doing. It looked mighty professional and I liked it muchly.
Have to agree with that as well.

Well, we'd just call "My controls" and no response was required.
What, no positive handover BEagle?
MightyGem is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 20:10
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
What, no positive handover BEagle?
Nope, deemed unecessary The 'My Controls' call was only required if the LHS pilot was the handling pilot as at 80KIAS he/she would move his/her hand from the nosewheel steering to the control column, keeping his/her right hand on the thrust levers until the V1 call, whereupon he/she would release full control of engine thrust to the Air Engineer.

The SOP was developed to minimise intercom calls during take-off to only those which were essential.
BEagle is online now  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 20:11
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes on 16 Posts
What, no positive handover BEagle?
{Remembers back to a grainy Chipmunk pre-flight film.....}

Pilot - "You have control John."

John Andrews - "I have control Sir."

Is this not the way its actually done? Please tell me it ain't so, its my sole source of reference to what you Sky Gods get up to, non-ME and ME alike.


{Just seen Beags reply, world has come crashing down................}
The Helpful Stacker is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2012, 20:48
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 261
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
"I have control" / "you have control" only needed when the control of the aircraft changes from one pilot to another.

Hercules LHS pilot has control (of the aircraft) throughout the take off (unless it's a co-pilots take off of course which is somewhat different) it is just that for the first part he executes that control via the nosewheel steering and the copilot keeps the yoke pushed forwards to ensure the nosewheel does not leave the ground, when the LHS pilot moves his hand from the nosewheel to the yoke he states "my controls" to tell the co-pilot to let go (effectively if not actually), there is NO handover of control of the aircraft, so no response needed.

On a co-pilots take off the "I have /you have" calls ARE made as the co-pilot does not have a steering input initially, and when he states "I have" the LHS pilot will release the nose wheel steering and the co-pilot takes full control (of the aircraft)

seeemples .. and seemed to work for just under 10,000 hours and 35 years of watching a pair of two winged master race individuals get it right .. mostly ...
OmegaV6 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.