Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

JHC Diktat bans personal cameras?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

JHC Diktat bans personal cameras?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Dec 2011, 16:49
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: South of the M4
Posts: 1,639
Received 16 Likes on 7 Posts


First flying photo taken in 1951.



..and last in 1980.

As a keen and enthusiastic photographer I took hundreds in between, with no problems at all.

One knew what was allowed and what wasn't - it was just a matter of keeping one's nose clean.
Warmtoast is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2011, 21:04
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
One instictively knows when something is right...
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 20th Dec 2011, 21:38
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,665
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Ahaaa,you mean big round engines with propellers...!
sycamore is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 13:49
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Hmm, I walked into that! You won't believe me now, but I meant one instinctively knows what to photograph and what not in your own aircraft. But your line is better!!!!
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 13:54
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Hmm, I walked into that! "

Jesus Courtney, I though you were a bit more switched on than that


You better take some more meds or stand in the queue behind Mach Two, Jamesdevice and a few others.
500N is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 14:41
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Europe
Posts: 5,335
Received 17 Likes on 6 Posts
Yeah, caught me at an off moment. Will try harder! No, will have another glass of wine and get over it!!!

Interesting that I think the vast majority on this thread are in agreement. Looks like, "take the pictures, avoid classified stuff and be careful what you do with it".
Courtney Mil is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 14:53
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have another Glass of wine sounds good.
500N is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2011, 16:35
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North of the M4
Posts: 348
Received 10 Likes on 2 Posts
I have a large number of old photos of Soviet, UK and NATO ships, Nuclear Submarines and planes all stamped with Restricted and all handed out willingly to crews by the Int department. Those in charge clearly understood that they would be taken off base and shown to families and friends because why else would people need them and why would they be so happy to hand them out? Did they think we all had secure combination cabinets in out houses and locked them away for 30 years? At the same time, I think most people realised that they shouldn't send them to the press or display them on the local village hall notice board (1980's internet).

Common sense semed to be the order of the day but it doesn't seem to be enough these days.

I do remember a mission being delayed for several hours though when a Co-pilot was arested and questioned by the Norwegian Police for taking pictures on a very dull P3 base hundreds of miles from anywhere.

Last edited by biddedout; 21st Dec 2011 at 18:05.
biddedout is offline  
Old 22nd Dec 2011, 13:17
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Among these dark Satanic mills
Posts: 1,197
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
as an example, just found this document online. I'm sure it shouldn't be there
http://info.publicintelligence.net/JFIIT-Handbook.pdf

relatively innocuous, but one gets the idea...
Innocuous and also a tad out of date. It refers to something called a Nimrod and also a GR-7/9 Harrier...
TorqueOfTheDevil is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.