Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Will Puma Survive?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Will Puma Survive?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Feb 2012, 16:14
  #281 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Speaking of Pumas I was driving up the M40 yesterday at 11.00 ish and a Puma came over the carriageway lower than I've ever seen a helicoter in flight not at an airshow. It could not have been more than 60-70 feet high, possibly lower.
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 18:34
  #282 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Mold
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
And your point is?
xenolith is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 19:10
  #283 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just as well they were authorised to fly at 50ft then! All perfectly above board and legal.

Yes Puma front end crews still get to the cockpit through the cabin and between the broom cupboards.
Door Slider is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 19:26
  #284 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Southwater
Age: 73
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by xenolith
And your point is?
No point. I was just having a chat, friendly like. It's not every day that a bloody great helicopter flits across a motorway that low in front of you. That's all.
RedhillPhil is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 19:28
  #285 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: .
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they usually fly alongside the motorway. Must be easier to read maps that way....
Milo Minderbinder is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 20:38
  #286 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Yes Puma front end crews still get to the cockpit through the cabin and between the broom cupboards.
I thought that they had got over that. IIRC is was when a Puma was being guarded by a gunner at Woolwich who got bored and fiiddled with the pilot's door jettison lever. He put it back but the indicator wire went back to its original position. When the young Michael was flying it back the door jettisoned itself. That was in 1972. After that the doors were locked and we had to crawl in the back.
I cannot think of any other Puma/Super Puma/EC225 crews that do that worldwide.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 20:51
  #287 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Detroit MI
Age: 66
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The only dignified way to enter a Puma is through the starboard cargo door...
Airborne Aircrew is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 21:01
  #288 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or if you forgot the keys through the load hatch!!!
Door Slider is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2012, 22:46
  #289 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England formerly Great Britain
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why bother opening a door when you have a man (or maness) to do it for you. A door has been lost since the event mentioned when a 'visitor' fiddled and it was missed on pre-flight walk around. (NI IIRC) Besides which it is windy and wet far more often then nice weather and the cabin is usefull to doff ones kit (LCJ / helmet / armour / weapon ) whilst keeping warm and dry.
Admin_Guru is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 08:33
  #290 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
was missed on pre-flight walk around.
A suggestion, for what it is worth; nothing to do with getting in and out of the doors because if a door is inadvertantly jettisoned it doesn't matter if the door is locked or not.
In 1978 a Bristow 330J lost the pilots door through reasons unknown; probably somebody fiddling;or the pilots nav bag interfering with a jettison lever as the nav bag went with the door. To reduce the chances of it happening again the indicator wire was moved to the inside lever so it was part of the cockpit checks and a frangible plastic cover was placed over it. The wire was touchable around the cover and it was designed so that it fell away from the vertical if broken. There has not been a case of a door falling away since and the doors are frequently used by the pilots during offshore operations. On top of that offshore workers are notorious fiddlers.
At that time there was a fair amount of communication on the technical side between the RAF and Bristows, (it took a long time for Bristows to get their engine alignment tool back from Odiham) so this modification, approved by the CAA, would have been known to the RAF. Whether they followed it up I do not know so it may well have been done.
Just a thought, anyway.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 10:25
  #291 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Kammbronn
Posts: 2,122
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Fareastdriver
On top of that offshore workers are notorious fiddlers.
Really? Perhaps in your part of the World. Few of us venture that far forward as we prefer to stay in the cabin and get some zeds in en-route. "More kip, less trip."
diginagain is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 17:52
  #292 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
It could not have been more than 60-70 feet high, possibly lower.
What the hell was he doing up there, so high?

ShyTorque is offline  
Old 15th Feb 2012, 19:06
  #293 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will Puma Survive?

.................. No!
Lottery Winner is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2012, 17:40
  #294 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cosford
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whats the latest on P2? Is it still happening? Do we have the first one in the UK yet? The cockpit pics look quite impressive!
puma fixer is offline  
Old 4th Apr 2012, 21:55
  #295 (permalink)  
PTT
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's happening.
PTT is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2012, 02:29
  #296 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yep, £14 million per airframe for how many years return of service? Has someone in the RAF got compromising photos of MPs and thus blackmailing them in to squandering the budget on P2?
wg13_dummy is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2012, 08:22
  #297 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: in the mess
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One could easily say exactly the same about either Wildcat variant or Merlin 2, so steady there...

I heard £2m per airframe, not sure about the planned exit date of Pu2, but I heard Eurocopter are content the airframe is a simble box and really isn't subject to fatigue, so potentially, like most MOD aircraft, I expect it will have every last drop of life squeezed from it before they finally retire them.
nice castle is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2012, 08:37
  #298 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Not lost, just temporarily unaware of my position
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wg13 & lottery winner et al

Let it go, move on, Puma Mk2 lives and is moving forward. You must be FAA? Remind me how much for Wildcat HMA (around twice that). How much for the great (grey) elephant of the Merlin Mk2 to Mk4 CSP upgrade? Spreadsheet Phil, I imagine, knows a good deal when he sees one and he'd probably recognise Merlin CSP isn't one of them. Were he to acknowledge that, he may call a halt to the nonsensical Green Merlin Mk3 marinisation. Sense would prevail, transition to the RN canx and Merlin Mk3 would remain where it currently resides - with RAF SH providing Land Lift to the Army (apologies to CHF). Spreadsheet Phil (or his successor, or the next govt) actually might try (or be enforced) to balance the books. Following on from Harrier, they might cancel (or sell on completion) the carriers, canx Dave B/C and the boats and the landing craft. Just like MPA and the demise of Nimrod MRA4, we wouldn't be in the LitM game anymore....
P-M-G is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2012, 12:49
  #299 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The programme to extend the life of the Puma helicopter agreed by the previous Administration (Puma HC Mk2 project) remains within its approval level of £339 million and is progressing well. As with other battlefield support helicopters, we are also enhancing Puma's capabilities to match the threat environment. The Strategic Defence and Security Review has confirmed the ongoing need for Puma.
£339,000,000 ÷ 28 = £14,125,000. (reduced to 24)

Concur with cost/point of Wildcat
wg13_dummy is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2012, 19:28
  #300 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Zummerset
Posts: 1,042
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
WG,
Be careful with your numbers; that quoted figure for P2 probably includes several years worth of support costs - it's unlikely to be just for design, parts and manufacture. P2 will be a superb airframe, and will outperform the Merlin in most areas and give the CH47 a run for its money in others.

I think history won't be kind to the acquisition and running costs v capability arguement for Wildcat, Me 2 and, particularly, Me 4....

OSD 2025? Highly unlikely IMHO (unless AW are going bust again)....
Evalu8ter is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.