Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Vulcan - bone domes

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Vulcan - bone domes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Dec 2011, 04:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Vulcan - bone domes

I remember seeing a photo somewhere of what was purported to be a very early Vulcan crew, with what looked like WW2-era leather flying helmets on.
Am I mistaken? (I suspect so).
When were hard flying helmets introduced into the RAF - and does anyone know on what type?
tartare is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 05:26
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 1950s and into the 60s RAF hard hats were a two piece arrangement, with a soft (blue cloth) inner which contained the headset, (and looked not dissimilar to a WW2 Russian tankies' helmet), and an outer fibreglass(?) shell - which was just that, a shell with nothing else except a visor attached.

I'd be guessing that the photograph you saw might have been a crewman, probably a back seater, wearing only his 'inner'. I don't know whether there was much to be gained for the blokes down the back of V bomber wearing their hard hats most of the time, as they didn't have ejection seats, and if they were going to try (the operative word being 'try') to get out, they'd have lots of time to put the outer shell on over their cloth inners before 'egressing'.
Fubaar is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 06:56
  #3 (permalink)  
GGR
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cheshire
Age: 71
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Vulcan Bang/Bale outs

Pardon the thread drift but can anyone add to this interesting topic with personal experience of parting company with one's Vulcan for real?

GGR
GGR is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 07:36
  #4 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The inner helmet was known as a G-Helmet and was common on all types. On aircraft without pressure breathing it was worn with an H-mask. Pressure breathing masks were originally the M-mask but this could not hold high pressure to the P (large face - bridge of nose to chin) and Q (medium face) were introduced.

It was originally thought that rear crew did not need the sun visor as they didn't look out (economy measure?) but by the early '60s visors all new bone domes were fitted with a visor.

We used to wear the bone dome take-off and landing and discard it as soon as we could. Later there was more acceptance of wearing it while low level flying.

Fubaar has a point which was why there was early reluctance to wearing the bone dome all the time. I think attitudes changed as the bone dome did have its uses in low level turbulence and a planned low level abandonment was not necessarily a slow process.

I was fortunate in never having to abandon an aircraft but we did a test once, Irish Sea, 500 feet 250 kt, all engines throttled to flight idle and a climb commenced. We topped at 1500 feet so there was some useful time in the event of loss of all 4-engines - say an extra 500 feet.

Of the low level crashes though I don't think they were survivable. The Shiraz crash on landing was a good example for wearing a bone dome, although I don't know if it was a factor in the survival of the rear crew.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 07:49
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Down south
Posts: 670
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall a story that the pilots only wore the inner helmet as this allowed them an extra inch headroom which aided the restricted view when landing.
No doubt an ex Vulcan driver will put me right .

I also believe that the first Britannia crews had to wear the cloth helmets as the powers that be decided they did not require commercial headsets to operate the aircraft but should wear existing military issue earphones and intercom built into the cloth helmet.
bingofuel is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 08:47
  #6 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Bingo, correct a la Vulcan. Similarly the Nav Radar "needed" the cloth helemet so he could operate the sun guns.

Later I got a Mk 3 helment but used to carry a G-helmet as well in case I had to work in a confined space. In practice I found I could operate the sextant while wearing the Mk 3 and it was no impediment when moving around the cockpit either.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 09:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: St Ives, Cambs
Age: 80
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was a Vulcan AEO in the late 70s and I replaced my inner and outer helmets for a one-piece job - a Mk4a I think. The old inner helmet made my head itch and I was far from convinced that if a low level abandonment was called for I would have time to don the outer helmet before exiting the aircraft. The Mk 4a seemed to be a bit heavy at first but I soon got used to it and I definitely preferred it to the two-piece head gear that I had earlier.
Rallyepilot is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 09:44
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
A V force pilot would remove the outer helmet soon after take off so that he could get his sunglasses on. (and get his feet on top of the rudder bars)
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 09:58
  #9 (permalink)  
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think one of the reasons for G/Mk 1 combination was that removal of the outer shell gave a little more headroom for the pilots so they did not have to incline neck and head inboard due to the canopy curvature (remember the initial design was for a single pilot positioned centrally and two rear crew).

Mister B
HTB is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 13:41
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: East Sussex UK
Age: 66
Posts: 6,995
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hi all ...

I believe the original Mk1 "outer" bone dome was issued without a visor but allowed for the wearing of flying goggles (the two male popper-studs at the rear of the helmet were originally designed to take elasticated webbing to keep the goggles strap in place). The picture below of a Canberra crew from the early 50's shows the Observer wearing the Mk1 "outer" without goggles and the Pilot wearing the electric hat "inner" plus goggles.



I believe the Mk1a "outer" was then introduced with a moulded forehead arrangement on the bone dome that allowed for the fixing of a track and visor as required. The picture below (again from the 50's) shows a Victor Bomb-Aimer with what looks like a Mk1a but with no track/visor arrangement.



The final picture from the Mid 60's shows Nav students in the back of a Dominie resplendent in their Mk1a's plus visors.



I recall that a mod was introduced to file-down the central plastic visor actuator to make it less unicornesk given a spate of cracked perspex canopies on the Chipmunk TMk 10 encountered during aerobatics or turbulence

Sorry if a bit off thread ... but thought it might be of interest !

Best regards and Happy Christmas to everyone...

Coff.

Last edited by CoffmanStarter; 15th Dec 2011 at 13:56.
CoffmanStarter is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 15:00
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 80
Posts: 6,379
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
CS - looks like the front of a Canberra T4 - 2 DV panels and a swing seat for the guy in the RHS
Wander00 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 15:35
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
For all the development history of AEA (Flying Clothing) contact Dr Graham Rood at F.A.S.T (The Farnborough museum) Farnborough Airsciences Trust homepage

The Mk1a protective & G helmet combi was replaced by the 2 & 3 series (in certain aircraft) the Mk 2 had "g" sensitve visors which were a bugger to set up & the Mk 3 took forever to fit. Then came the Mk 4 (Funny old thing)

As an aside - I remember that the Mk4 `could not be used` in the Chipmunk because it had never been formally cleared!(according to MoD PE)
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 17:20
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rubber boat shed
Age: 84
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello oldman

My first job at my first unit RAF Cranwell was modifing Mk 1 helmets to Mk 1a standard fitting the track and visor mechanism which involved drilling 4 holes and securing the track with self-tapping screws coated with a very sticky varnish to help prevent the screws from working loose.
Later helmets had metal nuts moulded into the helmet shell.The Mk 1 helmet did not have an adjustable harness. It came in 14 different sizes and fitting was by trial and error. The helmet being a snug fit over the cloth 'G' helmet if it was too tight the wearer could end with an excruciating headache.
Well thats what aircrew useally told me. Perhaps that was the main reason rear crew members prefered not to wear them after take off.
When tall aircrew flew in Chipmunk aircraft wearing the Mk 1a helmet the visor operating knob could touch the canopy!! there was then a modification to saw 1/2 inch off.
Ancient Squipper is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 19:05
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" I remember that the Mk4 `could not be used` in the Chipmunk "

Oh dear ! I did, no one told me !!
India69 is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 20:10
  #15 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Ancient Squipper
The Mk 1 helmet did not have an adjustable harness. It came in 14 different sizes and fitting was by trial and error. The helmet being a snug fit over the cloth 'G' helmet if it was too tight the wearer could end with an excruciating headache.
Well thats what aircrew useally told me.
However the medics told us it had to be tight if it was to work .

It was not unknown for the new recruit to wear the helmet in bed to break it in

In 1965 there was a trial of a new lightweight and ventilated helmet to try and overcome V-force resistance. It was like a pudding basin or the old style motorbike helmets. It was painted white, had ventilation holes and IIRC a leather edging for the chin strap. It was very popular and assessed as useless.

One AEO selected for the trial refused to hand his back.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 21:27
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A better place.
Posts: 2,319
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Guys - can I thank you all for contributing.
That's what I love about this site.
As an avid consumer of aviation facts and history - it's fascinating to be able to read all of this - and a privilege to be able to talk with those of you who served and flew the kit for real.
Coffman starter - thanks for those photos - it was indeed the inner cloth helmet that I mistook for a leather one.
I've often thought there'd be a fantastic feature film in the story of the V-Force.
Having visited Hendon, stood under the bomb bay of the Vulcan there and watched the old footage of the streaming take off of multiple Vulcans, it's very sobering to think what it must have like...
tartare is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 21:33
  #17 (permalink)  
HTB
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Over the hill (and far away)
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dim memory - was it a G/Mk 1 combo that Harold Wilson was fitted with on one occasion, with the shell on back to front?

Mister B
HTB is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 21:48
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SW England
Age: 77
Posts: 3,896
Received 16 Likes on 4 Posts
As well as for take-off/landing, bone domes were required down the back of Victor tankers during refuelling. I never had an "all in one" helmet, and was quite happy with my 2-part Mk 1a, as several hours in a cloth helmet were a lot more comfortable than in a Mk 2 or 3.

tartare - have a look at the V-Force Reunion website - you should find a lot to interest you there and some very good pictures on the gallery.
Tankertrashnav is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 22:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Further to the G helmet `comfort` issue, I recall an OC of the RAFs premier recce squadron saying (Jags in Germany) that `in case of war` he would revert to the G helmet from his Mk 4 as it would be easier to check 6. I don`t think IAM would have approved.

As for the Mk 4 not in a Chippy - Well, I guess PE were keen to fire a 9lb Chicken at it, but never got tasked......Ho Hum.
oldmansquipper is offline  
Old 15th Dec 2011, 22:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Threshold 06
Posts: 576
Received 25 Likes on 16 Posts
Hi Ancient - I recall all those mods - the threads were suposedly locked in with a stinking gasket sealant - The days before locktite

As a young airman on V bombers I remember the joy of before flights and laying out 10 Vulcan crews worth of kit (60 plus helmets, Life jackets etc) at 2 in the morning, making sure the SARAH (remember them?) frequencies did not conflict etc etc... all to be ready for the next days flyng starting at 6.

Also, being responsible for holding every aircrew members locker keys so we could put their flying clothing away after flight servicing, only to discover that the canned soup hoard within many of them was so large you couldn`t get the effin kit in!...

Oh, what fun we had?

Last edited by oldmansquipper; 15th Dec 2011 at 22:40. Reason: missing word
oldmansquipper is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.