Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Retirement at 55.....or later?

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Retirement at 55.....or later?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th Nov 2011, 18:22
  #21 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 429 Likes on 226 Posts
Not quite correct ST my old china, you can continue to fly for hire or reward over the age of 60 in a 2 crew aircraft provided the other crewmember is below age 60 to a maximum of age 65. It therefore follows that you are correct with regards to solo pilot ops.
Yes correct, I should have expanded that. But a lot of corporate work is single pilot.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 7th Nov 2011, 19:18
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...respect your opinion on this matter but I would disagree. When the regulations for WRAF to leave on pregnancy were in force, it wasn't discrimination, it was the rules. It is very easy to judge yesterday's rules by today's standards. My sister was one of those who had to leave.
Sorry to say you are wrong on both counts (or perhaps misinformed would be a better choice of words). The MOD/Armed Forces were subject to the Sex Discimination Act from 1975. Prior 1975 to QR's were primary; following 1975 QR's were redundant and their enforcement where pregnancy was concerned was illegal. That is why so many WRAFs gained so much compensation...because it was proved in a court of law (or equivalent) that the MOD was operating illegally for all compulsory dismissals (that's what it was) on the grounds of pregnancy after 1975.

And yes it was clearly discrimination. You are right a couple having a baby is a lifestyle choice...and so is who stays at home and raises it. It can be both parents, neither parent (hire a nanny) or either mum or dad. That is the modern world we live in and trashing a women's career because a couple have decided to have a baby is nonsense and wrong every which way you look at it....as wrong as it has been illegal ever since 1975.

Last edited by The Old Fat One; 8th Nov 2011 at 11:06.
The Old Fat One is offline  
Old 8th Nov 2011, 07:22
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: preston
Age: 76
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Survival

In 2002 when I left the service at 55, I was offered, and seriously considered taking a one year extension.
The major drawback was that my gratuity would not be paid until completion of the extension. I could live without that, but I was also told that should I not survive for the year, my wife would receive a significantly lower gratuity based on the widows pension.
dalek is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.