Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Old Large Bombers: Dive Bombing

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Old Large Bombers: Dive Bombing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 11:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: France 46
Age: 77
Posts: 1,743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the known unreliability of the Vulture engines fitted to the Manchester I doubt that any sane Pilot would even have considered initiating a dive bombing attack in that Aircraft. The first operational sortie by Manchesters was on 24-25 February 1941 and its final Bomber Command operation was 25-26 June 1942.
cazatou is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 15:18
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Warrington, UK
Posts: 3,839
Received 76 Likes on 31 Posts
"much to the embarrassment of the bomb aimer"
More like "much to the consternation of the bomb aimer" I would have thought.
MightyGem is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 16:34
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: 2 m South of Radstock VRP
Posts: 2,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought that, too, about the bomb aimer's reaction. That's what the man wrote, though.
GOLF_BRAVO_ZULU is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 16:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Far West Wessex
Posts: 2,580
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
We are talking about the dive angle that these aircraft could attain twice, right?
LowObservable is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 17:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LowObservable

We are talking about the dive angle that these aircraft could attain twice, right?
And sometimes even a third time.
hval is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 18:12
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Didn't the Pathfinders sometimes dive steeply with Lancasters or was it that they were approaching the target accurately at low level? (Can't find the book just now.)
walter kennedy is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 18:45
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From Century of Flight

.... This created, by the time the Kammhuber Line was being approached, a mass of aircraft 112 km. (70 ml.) long and some 1,200 m. (4,000 ft.) deep, which, with any luck, completely overwhelmed the Kammhuber defensive box through which it flew. Air gunners had strict orders never to open fire unless attacked as a bomber was more likely to survive by evasion in the dark than by taking the offensive. If attacked, the corkscrew manoeuvre was the best tactic to employ; Martin Middlebrook relates how one German nigh fighter ace followed a corkscrewing Lancaster bomber for three quarters of an hour without once being able to get into a firing position.
hval is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 18:56
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lancaster Corkscrew

I have found an interesting article on corkscrewing in a Lancaster; it is on our very own PPRuNe, from February 2007.

Click Here.

An interesting read - as is the link in the thread.
hval is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 21:34
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Malkin Tower
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Off -topic, but were the remaining Manchesters scrapped completely or reworked as Lancasters?
jamesdevice is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2011, 22:52
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Darling - where are we?
Posts: 2,580
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
The German obsession with dive bombing after the success of the Ju87 in the Blitzkrieg era led the Luftwaffe to specify that the Heinkel 177 should be capable of dive bombing
The Germans were obsessed with dive bombing from quite an early time, certainly well before the start of WW2. Len Deighton's book - I can't remember if it was Fighter or Blitzkgreig covered the development of diver bomber TTPs in the 30s. But as well as the Ju-87 and He-177, the Ju-88 was also designated as a dive bomber as far back as 1937. Apparently, it took them until 1943 to realise that the airframe couldn't take the stresses of the pullout at the bottom of the dive, so restricted the dive angle to 45 degrees.

However, one source talks of one airframe being seen with dive angles marked up on the canopy in 10 degree increments from 40-70 degrees of dive

1940 | 3422 | Flight Archive
Melchett01 is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 08:51
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,571
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 32 Posts
Off -topic, but were the remaining Manchesters scrapped completely or reworked as Lancasters?
Those Mancasters still on the order books were delivered as Lancasters. Records of existing Manchesters mostly record "Struck -Off Charge". I assume that Lancasters converted from Manchesters would have kept the original registration number and this would have shown up in the records.

Of interest(?). When 9 Sqn personnel arrived at Waddington to convert to the Lancaster in mid 1942, they carried out the majority of their training in Manchesters until more Lancasters became available. The Manchesters were used for practice bombing and gunnery training with the automatic gun-sight. I have not discovered whether any of these went on operations, but no Manchester losses are recorded for 9 Sqn as far as I am aware.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 09:39
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eventually 200 to 209 Manchesters entered service, before production ended in November 1941. The aircraft was withdrawnm from service June 1942.

193 were operational. Of the 78 aircraft lost, 45 were non-operational losses of which 30 involved engine failure. Later on in its life the Manchester became a fairly effective aircraft once issues with the Vulture engines were resolved.

A good link to read: - Lancaster History
hval is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 10:01
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,571
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 32 Posts
Eventually 200 to 209 Manchesters entered service, before production ended in November 1941. The aircraft was withdrawnm from service June 1942.

I assume that this date is for operational service - 9 Sqn were using the Manchester for training at the end of August 1942: their first raid with Lancasters was on 10 Sep.
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 14:32
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wensleydale,

The last operational trip utilising the Manchester was a bombing raid over Bremen on the 25th June 1942.

Are you sure 9 Sqn flew the Manchester? I know they flew Vickers Wellingtons (Feb 1939-Aug 1942) and that these were replaced by Lancasters in 1942. I have found reference to 9 Sqn using manchesters for trials in 1942 on one web site so far ( Here ). IX Squadron certainly did not use the Manchester in anger.

Interesting if IX Squadron did carry out trials on the Manchester. Would like to know more.
hval is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 17:07
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere flat
Age: 68
Posts: 5,571
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 32 Posts
HVAL,

Sources are "For Faith and Freedom" by John Hamlin (History of Waddington) page 89:

" 9 Sqn moved on 7 August 1942 to Waddington..... Conversion on the new Lancaster began at once, though much training was carried out on the Manchester until enough Lancasters became available. By 20 Aug practice bombing details were being carried out in the Manchesters and air gunners being trained in the use of the automatic gunsight."


and "Bombers First and Last" by Gordon Thorburn (War history of 9 Sqn) Chapter 3 (page 94 in my copy)...

"Pilots began training by flying the Manchester, Bomb aiming had started to become a specialised trade and it was completely so by now with the new, and excellent, semi-automatic Mk 14 bombsight."

W
Wensleydale is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 17:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Devon UK
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Were the issues with Vultures resolved?

I imagine that merely changing the name might improve the things...

Cheers!
Vitesse is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 19:09
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 5,222
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
The Vulture was a pair of Kestrels welded together. The Germans had the similar problem with the Heinkel 177 which had a two pairs of DB 601s welded together.
Fareastdriver is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2011, 19:56
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Glasgow
Age: 61
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@ Wensleydale,

Thank you for that, appreciated.


@ Vitesse,

Were the issues with Vultures resolved?
Yes they were just about resolved. When the Vulture was cancelled there were no more losses than any other bomber for mechanical failures. The engine was still complex, but they worked. Rolls Royce, unfortunately, did not have the resources available to invest in the development of the Vulture engine when needed. Majority of work was being carried out on the Rolls Royce Merlin instead. Rolls Royce needed the Vulture team to assist in developing the Merlin, which was already a proven power source.
hval is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.