Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Iran agents 'planned US terror attacks'

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Iran agents 'planned US terror attacks'

Old 11th Oct 2011, 21:48
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: The North
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Iran agents 'planned US terror attacks'

Soon to be followed by the sound of Tomahawks over Tehran....

BBC News - Iran agents 'planned US terror attacks'

£10 says Ahmadinejad is sticking tape on his windows.
Fox Four is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 00:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: East of LGB
Age: 68
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....sticking tape on his windows.
Good. The laser reflects better off of tape than clear glass.
11Fan is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 01:42
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 62
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well since the demise of OBL, Obama has gotten a taste for it.
Captain Sand Dune is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 02:28
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmm Following the usual protocol - it was planned by Iran - allies persuaded to invade North Korea..
jwcook is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 02:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" Well since the demise of OBL, Obama has gotten a taste for it."

but he wouldn't have the balls for it.

He'll leave it to Israel to do it for him.

.
500N is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 04:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Victoria
Age: 62
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but he wouldn't have the balls for it.
He may not, but Hillary has!
He'll leave it to Israel to do it for him.
The smartest thing the US can do in that regard is to keep Israel out of it.
Captain Sand Dune is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 05:04
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
But Hillary doesn't have her finger on the button so doesn't have control of the situation.

And regarding Israel, stopping Israe from retaliating against Iraq's scud's is one thing, stopping them from doing over Iran is another, especially as some other "Arab" countries wouldn't mind it happening as well but can't be seen to be supporting Israel.

Just my HO.

.
500N is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 09:10
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cambridge
Age: 62
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Button

I was sure that it was Hillary's husband who had his finger on the button! Oh no, my mistake, it wasn't his finger it was a cigar.....

Hat, coat, sharp exit!
The Blue Parrot is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 11:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree.

If they wanted to bloody the nose of the Saudis, why pick to do it in the US when SA is across the water from them, a lot easier to move around etc.

.

Last edited by 500N; 12th Oct 2011 at 11:46.
500N is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 11:31
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Borderline England
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever it is, it's not Britain's problem and for the sake of our armed forces, we should stay the hell out of it.
Unchecked is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 11:51
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree, but is it that simple ?

As to why the Iranian's were going to do this, is it a case of getting two birds with one stone ? Payback for the Saudi's pissing off Iran for intervening in Bahrain and secondly, doing it in the US to get at the US.

Saudi Arabia would support Israel doing the dirty work / an Israel pre emptive on Iran because of Nuclear Weapons.

The question is, how far would it escalate and could the UK stay out of it ?
.
500N is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 13:36
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 611
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well the battle proven Typhoons are home - looks like David is pro-RAF and perhaps lining up their next diplomatic mission?

"Britain has promised to back US reprisals against Iran after an alleged plot to kill the Saudi ambassador in Washington was foiled"!!!!!!!

Britain Pledges To Back US As 'Iranian Govermment Plot To Kill Ambassador' Is Foiled | World News | Sky News
Grimweasel is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 14:55
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tonker is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 15:19
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,173
Received 374 Likes on 230 Posts
Grimweasel:

Try reading the indictment.

http://web.caller.com/2011/pdf/arbabsiar-shakuri-indictment.pdf

This guy was apparently in the US since late 70's or early 80's, attended Texas A & I university (Now part of the Texas A & M system) but did not graduate (got a degree somewhere else) was a small businessman of various successes and failures, and for one reason or another, ended up back in Iran in about 2010.

Why he'd be messing about with Mexican narco gang and cartels remains an interesting motivation, but the people who knew him in Corpus Christi, Texas, suggest one very simple motivation: money. You can read comments on him at the web site for the Corpus Christi Caller Times. (www.caller.com)

His connections in Iran?

Maybe some of those folks had other motivations.

I noticed that on the Skynews web page a bunch of idiots assert that this is a "false flag" by the CIA. Also see comments like "US has been itching to invade Iran."

Actually, no. It appears that stupidity in the UK is as common as pints in a pub.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 19:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Luberon
Age: 72
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Any Westerner in Iran should get the hell out, pronto. The Iranians will be looking to arrest anyone they can use as a bargaining chip in advance of any reprisals by the West.
sitigeltfel is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 19:40
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Wag the Dog (1997) - IMDb

Funny how US knew in June yet did nothing until their agents sorry "Hikers" were released by Iran for breaching Iranian border.
racedo is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 19:56
  #17 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Great opportunity to shoot the cr@p out of their off shore oil installations as a reprisal. 300 rounds of HE on Kharg Island would have the desired effect. It might even coax their mickey mouse airforce up for destruction. A T23 and a T45 should do the job very nicely.

Last edited by Navaleye; 12th Oct 2011 at 20:27.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 20:59
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,173
Received 374 Likes on 230 Posts
racedo: you might want to read the indictment as well.

This was an FBI case being developed.

The hiker issue wasn't an FBI case ... it is not beyond possible that the usual stove pipes were in action.

I suspect no small amount of interagency friction in this matter, having nothing to do with the idiots who went hiking one fine day ... but I can see how the State Department folks would want to clean that matter up ahead of any confrontation, if the interagency communication was any good.

I tend to bet the under, on that.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 21:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fife, Scotland
Age: 78
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course, this can't possibly have anything to do with the fact that Holder is under investigation.

Politicians and political appointees never, ever try to deflect criticism by drumming up a new scare ......
A A Gruntpuddock is offline  
Old 12th Oct 2011, 22:03
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia - South of where I'd like to be !
Age: 59
Posts: 4,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Navaleye

As much as it would be interesing, I think the US would need to have a few ducks lined up before opening up on them. Too many assets in the Gulf easily hit in retaliation.

.
500N is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.