Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Officer sacked from post

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Officer sacked from post

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th May 2012, 08:57
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: MBZ 124.2
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
blunties can take months to staff an Establishment Variation Form
So, unit X requires a new post. Is it justified? Is the amount of working hours there and presented in the case? OK, it looks justified. Are there any establishment surpluses elsewhere? If there are what are the effects on the losing unit (should be nil but you have to check)? If there are no surpluses then what is the effect on the training schedule? Are there any graduates from training available within the time scale required? What is the knock-on effect on the recruiting process? Right, that's that lot sorted.

Now let's have a look at the receiving unit.

Does the additional post cause an increase in the supervisory positions? What effect on accommodation? Messing? MT requirements and the host of other things that support manpower on any unit. If there are then return to start point and work out the effects.

And then.....Bingo.... your 6 months are up.

Your cunning plan mutty for getting that particular problem sorted out in double quick time would be warmly welcomed by those whose job it is to solve all those problems.

Still, I don't suppose they'll be waiting expectantly.
storl tern is offline  
Old 7th May 2012, 11:52
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: The Roman Empire
Posts: 2,452
Received 72 Likes on 33 Posts
Surely "accommodation? Messing? MT requirements and the host of other things that support manpower on any unit." are the responsibility of the receiving unit, not the person authorising the change in establishment? Also,in the case mutty quotes there was no change in numbers, and therefore presumably no such complications......



Just asking out of curiosity, not interested in participating in, or continuing, any aircrew vs bluntie "debate"!
Biggus is offline  
Old 7th May 2012, 15:26
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oxon
Age: 66
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by storl tern
And then.....Bingo.... your 6 months are up.
Sadly justification of this sort of thing is why we are so proper f@@ked
Seldomfitforpurpose is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.