Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Navtech TAPs etc.

Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Navtech TAPs etc.

Old 14th Jun 2011, 06:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Whyte House
Age: 91
Posts: 1,887
Navtech TAPs etc.

So, how do 'we' all feel about the ditching of reliable Jeppy plates and the move to Navtech TAPs?

Forgive the lead-in question, but I think they're a bag o' sh1te.
Willard Whyte is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 09:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 20
I think that ditching the Jepp TAPs and moving to Navtech is a huge step backwards in the provision of AI. Finally after getting worldwide access to a standard format of TAPS, it is taken away for what I would view as an inferior product, also with far less coverage. I remember when Navtech was briefly used a couple of years ago, there where loads of complaints and they stopped being provided. This seems to be a case of the provider not understanding what the user needs. Sadly its now back to using 5 different formats of TAPs again!
TMK1 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 13:03
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
So, we ditched our beloved Jeppy plates for NavTech which have since, and very quickly, been shown to be untrustworthy and lacking Jeppy's coverage.

For why? Rumours of all kinds of contract wrangling and individuals' tete-a-tetes have left the operators with a far worse service.

I'd love to meet the guy/girl who made that decision....to thank them in person, obviously!
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 13:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,201
Oh Dear !

Having worked for two companys recently who used NavTech I can say that I am now delighted to now be flying for a company that uses Jeppesen TAPs.

The NavTech plates try to put too much data on one plate, the east bound SID chart for LGW is cramed with so much data that the stop altitudes are confusing and very likeky to result in a level bust, it is only the fact that aircraft are usualy under radar vectors towards the end of the SID that has preventd this mistake being made.

On another STAR chart for a North African airfield the step down altitudes are unclear.

These are just two examples that spring quickly to mind.

All in all the data is badly depicted and the coverage is not the best but they are cheaper than Jeppesen..................I guess this policy is just SOP for the armed forces at the moment.
A and C is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 13:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: somewhere special
Age: 42
Posts: 149
Can i just clarify, you are being given Navtech plates as opposed to Jepp in the RAF? How does that tie in with the navigation database you are using? Unless you are changing databases too is that not a prime opportuntity for inconsistencies between the two?
Herc-u-lease is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 15:56
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,662
I'm sure somebody decided that the cheaper option suited aircrew the best
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 17:13
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: In the Ether
Posts: 437
Can i just clarify, you are being given Navtech plates as opposed to Jepp in the RAF?
Allegedly (and this is ppRuNe!) those making the decisions spurred on by our appetite for risk ownership post-Hadden-Cave asked Jeppesen to sign away their collective lives and sign to say something verging on "We hereby agree that any aircraft that ever crashes with a Jeppesen plate in the flight deck/cockpit did so because of the TAPs". Clearly, Jepp said "Screw that RAF" and we're left with NavTech and all their errors.....at least that's what i heard

The remainder of the Jeppesen service - JetPlans, Regulated Take-off Tables/Graphs etc - is still in place, thankfully.

Bring back Jeppesen TAPs not only are they correct but i can then use their iPad App too

As for VigilantPilot's "That verges on a flight safety risk....", that's the understatement of the century dear chap! Flying with incorrect plates and no backup IFR/IMC? How much of a fall do we want to set ourselves up for?
Uncle Ginsters is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 19:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,442
We use Navtech and they are universally loathed. All the important info can be crammed into a tiny corner of a plate. Useful info like check altitudes for non-precision approaches was removed. The glossy paper is hard to read at night. There are numerous errors. Taxi charts extend over several pages. They are a bag o' sh1te. It's bad enough in the airline environment where we go to the same places quite regularly and have time to interpret the plates. I don't envy anyone who has to use them in anger, under pressure and for the first time.
Megaton is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 19:49
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: A flat spot
Posts: 20
If you have any problems with the plates there is an easy way to have your concerns heard, submit a DFSOR.
Even the hazard/observations are taken very seriously and are an excellent way get your point across to the people who need to know.
ASIMS is one of the few recent innovations that actually seems to work as advertised so get typing
Critical_Al is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2011, 21:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Newcastle, Australia
Posts: 71
The company I work for is going the other way - Navtech to Jepps. Can't happen a minute too soon! Are you guys being forced to use Navtech performance charts and nav data too?
Darwinism is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 07:28
  #11 (permalink)  

Champagne anyone...?
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: EGDL
Age: 50
Posts: 1,414
I couldn't quite believe it myself when I heard we were doing this. Yet more muddled thinking and flawed decision making from the RAF - an outfit that is fast becoming a world leader in both fields. I would despair but there's really no point bothering any more.
StopStart is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 08:40
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: these mist covered mountains are a home now for me.
Posts: 1,662
I've seen AIDU facsimile us copies of plates before. Can you imagine how unreadable it becomes when coloured sheets are sent via fax? Then they were photocopied and handed to the crews. Yeah right - at least it was cheaper (that word came up alot during my discussions with them).
Runaway Gun is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 17:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Anywhere
Posts: 126
A serious suggestion

I know that I'm going to get shouted down for this but can i make a serious suggestion? Every time you uncover an inaccurate plate or a poorly depicted plate that leads to (or indeed could lead) an infringement, then right an incident report on ASIMS. With the MAA's new power and the onus on reporting all incidents, they will soon get a wealth of data of rubbish TAPS and someone will have to change it. Make all this new fangled risk-register and post-Haddon-Cave gayness work in our favour for once. These TAPS are crap and AIDU have lost the plot recently so the more this is brought to the attention of the high-paid help who sign of on our risks, the more inclined they will be to do something about it.
FJ2ME is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2011, 17:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 210
FJ2ME,


Completely agree. The only way to tackle this is DFSOR every single time there is any confusion or discrepancy. No good complaining without actually doing anything about this.
I'm Off! is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.