And now it's Yemen's turn to meet the fleet ...
Red On, Green On
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
And now it's Yemen's turn to meet the fleet ...
BBCi reporting that Royal Marines on board RFA Fort Victoria are standing by to rescue UK nationals from Yemen.
Just as well we're not reducing the size of the fleet at the moment ... - oh heck, we are
Just as well we're not reducing the size of the fleet at the moment ... - oh heck, we are
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
Last time we had a big warship off the now Yemenii coast I recall it was 5 flat tops including the 3 Commando carriers.
Of course in those days we had several fleet carriers and almost as many commando ones.
Of course in those days we had several fleet carriers and almost as many commando ones.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wiltshire
Age: 59
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reminds me of the incident in 2002 when Marines landed on the Spanish beach instead of the one in Gib. One of the Marines said something along the lines of "I know we are good but it would take a little more than 20 to capture Spain".
80 Marines on an RFA that is due to be scrapped...HMS Cumberland on it's way to be scrapped, rescuing British nationals from Libya.....you couldn't make this up
Edited to add - Misread the BBC report - added the 0 to 8 to make correct number of Marines.
80 Marines on an RFA that is due to be scrapped...HMS Cumberland on it's way to be scrapped, rescuing British nationals from Libya.....you couldn't make this up
Edited to add - Misread the BBC report - added the 0 to 8 to make correct number of Marines.
Last edited by November4; 7th Jun 2011 at 10:54.
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sussex
Age: 66
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last evacuation from Yemen
As I recall in 1986 the Royal Yacht was used to evacuate people from Aden, then part of South Yemen... So this is prospectively the third evacuation.
Red On, Green On
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Has anyone else spotted that it's not even a warship that the Marines will be using as their platform - RFAs are civilian-flagged and operated, albeit owned by MoD Navy.
Perhaps we don't have enough warships for the constantly-changing world we live in and trade with?
Perhaps we don't have enough warships for the constantly-changing world we live in and trade with?
Despite being short of frigates and destroyers, I suspect we have a frigate or two East of Suez. But, according to the Telegraph, RFA Argus is also in the area.
The noteworthy thing about both ships is their aviation facilities, Fort Victoria is operating three or four Merlins, and Argus even more Merlins/Sea Kings/Lynx/Chinooks.
Now who was it who said we wouldn't need shipborne aviation for ten years?
The noteworthy thing about both ships is their aviation facilities, Fort Victoria is operating three or four Merlins, and Argus even more Merlins/Sea Kings/Lynx/Chinooks.
Now who was it who said we wouldn't need shipborne aviation for ten years?
Red On, Green On
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Now who was it who said we wouldn't need shipborne aviation for ten years?
While I'm not saying that it applies in this case....
just because you use a capability that you currently have, it doesn't mean that its retention is essential...
just because you use a capability that you currently have, it doesn't mean that its retention is essential...
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temporarily missing from the Joe Louis Arena
Posts: 2,131
Received 27 Likes
on
16 Posts
Now who was it who said we wouldn't need shipborne aviation for ten years?
I believe it was specifically shipborne fixed-wing aviation (even more specifically, the need to retain Harrier GR9 in order to maintain carrier currency for the WAFU) that questions were raised over and that you have been banging, nay pummeling, your drum over.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: crewe
Age: 77
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One or Two Strike Carrier, would be the answer..... If we had any
Ships V/Victorious Hermes off Aden 1967
Ships V/Victorious Hermes off Aden 1967
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For what it is worth I am afraid I have to agree with a former poster on this thread. Why the hell are we as a country putting our troop's lives at risk to rescue ex-pats and tax dodgers? if you wish to go and work in Dubai/Algeria/ Middle East etc, taking the big dollars then good for you. But you should be prepared to accept that potentially you are standing into danger; and you should not expect HMG to come and get you(stand fast Brit Embassy staff etc). I was sickened to hear those whinning ungrateful gits standing on the jetty in Libya when the RN was unable to get them out. Make your beds and lay in them!! For too long these oil workers et al have been able to get away with their tax dodges, despite supposedly being proud Brits; yet when they are taken ill they rush home to get the good old NHS to look after them. Let them rot in bloody Yemen.
Rant over.
Rant over.
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: crewe
Age: 77
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Withdrawal Aden 1967 BRITISH TROOPS WITHDRAW (aka SIR HUMPHREY TREVELYAN LEAVES ADEN) - British Pathe
Government Responsibility to UK Nationals abroad
For all those complaining about the 'tax-free expats', would you prefer to have UK nationals slaughtered/taken hostage/attacked, resulting in direct, focussed (ie kinetic) intervention by HM Forces?
Not everyone who lives in the Middle East are money-grubbing individuals with outstanding CCJs, CSA etc after them. In Yemen (which is hardly the expat destination of choice) there are a large numbe rof NGO and IO staff, in addition to 'domestic' British Passport holders.
Not everyone who lives in the Middle East are money-grubbing individuals with outstanding CCJs, CSA etc after them. In Yemen (which is hardly the expat destination of choice) there are a large numbe rof NGO and IO staff, in addition to 'domestic' British Passport holders.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hades.
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why the hell are we as a country putting our troop's lives at risk to rescue ex-pats and tax dodgers? if you wish to go and work in Dubai/Algeria/ Middle East etc, taking the big dollars then good for you. But you should be prepared to accept that potentially you are standing into danger; and you should not expect HMG to come and get you(stand fast Brit Embassy staff etc). Make your beds and lay in them!! For too long these oil workers et al have been able to get away with their tax dodges, despite supposedly being proud Brits; yet when they are taken ill they rush home to get the good old NHS to look after them. Let them rot in bloody Yemen.
Some of us came to the middle east because some cowardly
drove several aircraft into buildings and we lost our jobs while others lost a lot more.Some of us have/still pay taxes so why shouldn't we use the NHS.
Some of us think that being in the ME is generally safer than certain parts of the UK.
Some of us are still "proud Brits".
Some of us have worked bloody hard to make the best of things and lay in our nice, soft fluffy beds.
If you're happy where you are, great. But don't have a go at "us" for making the most of what we have and have given to you.
